Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE B. SPINKS,, 591 B.R. 113 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2018)

. . . language is duplicative of the language contained in the Suspension Paragraph. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.11 . . .

IN RE SERRANO,, 545 B.R. 447 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2016)

. . . Sommer, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[4] (16th ed.2015). . . . Sommer, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[4] (16th ed.2015). . . .

IN RE CARPENTER v., 540 B.R. 691 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2015)

. . . Dep’t of Revenue (In re Shank), 792 F.2d 829, 832 (9th Cir.1986); accord, 4 Collier on Bankcruptcy ¶ 507.11 . . . BAP 1989), aff'd mem., 905 F.2d 1540 (9th Cir.1990) (§ 507(a)(8)(E)); accord, 4 Collier ¶ 507.11[4]. . . . Ilko, 651 F.3d at 1056-57; Shank, 792 F.2d at 832; accord, 4 Collier ¶ 507.11[4]. . . .

In V. DONAHUE J., 520 B.R. 782 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2014)

. . . . § 502(i). . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[3], . . . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[3][c] ("There is no requirement, however, that the last date on . . . In re Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., 37 F.3d 982, 984 (3d Cir.1994). . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy V 507.11 . . . Mo.Rev.Stat. § 137.080. . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[3][b]. . . .

IN RE FUGITT v., 539 B.R. 289 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2014)

. . . , trust fund taxes do not lose their priority status no matter their age. 4 Collier on BanKRuptCY ¶ 507.11 . . .

In CARPENTER, 519 B.R. 811 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2014)

. . . See 4 CollieR, supra, ¶ 507.11[4] (identifying five elements that must be present for a claim to achieve . . . As explained in 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[6] (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . .

IN RE K LUNDE, LLC, In LLC, In LLC, In IPS LLC,, 513 B.R. 587 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2014)

. . . [incurred] prior to the petition date, it will be eligible for priority.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11 . . .

In J. TILEN- BERNABE, 499 B.R. 241 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2013)

. . . Sommer, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[l][b] (16th ed. 2013). . . .

In MOLINA, 487 B.R. 73 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2013)

. . . Sommer, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[2][b] (16th ed. 2012). . . .

In HANSEN v., 470 B.R. 535 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2012)

. . . See 4 Collier, supra, ¶ 507.11[4] (identifying five elements that must be present for a claim to achieve . . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[1] (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer eds., 16th ed.). . . . .

In INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO PARTNERS, LTD. v., 468 B.R. 582 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[6] (Alan N. Resnick and Henry J. Sommer eds. . . .

In C. MONTGOMERY M., 446 B.R. 475 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2011)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11 [9] ("The suspension of time periods established by either of these . . .

UNITED STATES v. HALL D., 617 F.3d 1161 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11[1] (15th ed. 2009) (“An eighth priority is granted under section 507(a . . . )(8) to ... certain kinds of prepetition taxes [including] trust fund taxes.”); id. ¶ 507.11 [4] ("[I . . .

UNITED STATES v. HALL D., 617 F.3d 1161 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.11 [1] (15th ed. 2009) ("An eighth priority is granted under section 507( . . . a)(8) to ... certain kinds of pre-petition taxes [including] trust fund taxes.”); id. ¶ 507.11 [4] (" . . .

In ALBERT LINDLEY LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL a k a A. L., 428 B.R. 276 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . Nov. 10, 1983); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.11[5] (15th ed.). . . .

In T. SZOSTEK, s s T. v. Of, 429 B.R. 552 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Act, the tax priority was one of only two that was not renumbered.” 4-507 Collier on Bankruptcy 11 507.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. V. Jr., 631 F. Supp. 269 (M.D.N.C. 1986)

. . . . §§ 1-507.1 to -507.11. . . .