Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 517.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 517.07 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 517.07

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 517
SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 517.07
517.07 Registration of securities.
(1) It is unlawful and a violation of this chapter for any person to sell or offer to sell a security within this state unless the security is exempt under s. 517.051, is sold in a transaction exempt under s. 517.061, is a federal covered security, or is registered pursuant to this chapter.
(2) No securities that are required to be registered under this chapter shall be sold or offered for sale within this state unless such securities have been registered pursuant to this chapter and unless prior to each sale the purchaser is furnished with a prospectus meeting the requirements of rules adopted by the commission.
(3) The office shall issue a permit when registration has been granted by the office. A permit to sell securities is effective for 1 year from the date it was granted. Registration of securities shall be deemed to include the registration of rights to subscribe to such securities if the application under s. 517.081 or s. 517.082 for registration of such securities includes a statement that such rights are to be issued.
(4) A record of the registration of securities shall be kept by the office, in which register of securities shall also be recorded any orders entered by the office with respect to such securities. Such register, and all information with respect to the securities registered therein, shall be open to public inspection.
(5) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, offers of securities required to be registered by this section may be made in this state before the registration of such securities if the offers are made in conformity with rules adopted by the commission.
History.s. 6, ch. 14899, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 6002(7); s. 3, ch. 24066, 1947; s. 11, ch. 25035, 1949; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 2, ch. 78-435; ss. 5, 15, ch. 79-381; ss. 4, 5, ch. 80-254; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; s. 1, ch. 83-201; s. 5, ch. 85-165; s. 6, ch. 86-85; ss. 14, 15, ch. 90-362; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 4, ch. 97-224; s. 587, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 517.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 517.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 517.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 517.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S517.07 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - F: T
S517.07 1 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - SELL UNREGISTERED NONEXEMPT SECURITY - F: T
S517.07 2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL REGIST PROV PROSPECTUS MEETNG REQUIREMENT - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HODGES, v. HARRISON,, 372 F. Supp. 3d 1342 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . (Count V) "Section 517.07 of the [Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act] provides that '[i]t . . . Stat. § 517.07(1). . . . Stat. § 517.07. . . . Stat. §§ 517.07, et seq. , And as a result of Harrison's sale of securities, Plaintiffs have suffered . . .

HONIG, a v. M. KORNFELD,, 339 F. Supp. 3d 1323 (S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 517.07 ). . . . Stat. § 517.07 requires every security sold in Florida to be registered with the ... . . . Stat. § 517.07 ("It is unlawful and a violation of this chapter for any person to sell or offer to sell . . .

COEXIST FOUNDATION, INC. v. FEHRENBACHER,, 865 F.3d 901 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . favor of Coexist on its claim for the sale of unregistered securities in violation of Florida Statute § 517.07 . . . Stat. § 517.07. . . .

P. McCLOSKEY, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES,, 172 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . §§ 517.07, 517.12, 626.611(16), (17), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

In A. BAVELIS, A. v., 773 F.3d 148 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . Section 517.07 lays out the registration requirements for the sale of securities, while § 517.061 exempts . . . Stat. § 517.07. Unlawful sales trigger the remedies set forth in § 517.211. . . . exemption in particular— § 517.061(11) — is relevant to the analysis here: The registration provisions of § 517.07 . . . the five conditions of § 517.061(ll)(a), that sale was exempt from the registration requirements of § 517.07 . . .

In A. BAVELIS, A. v., 773 F.3d 148 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . Section 517.07 lays out the registration requirements for the sale of securities, while § 517.061 exempts . . . Stat. § 517.07. Unlawful sales trigger the remedies set forth in § 517.211. . . . exemption in particular— § 517.061(11) — is relevant to the analysis here: The registration provisions of § 517.07 . . . the five conditions of § 517.061(ll)(a), that sale was exempt from the registration requirements of § 517.07 . . .

BRIVIK, v. LAW,, 545 F. App'x 804 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 517.07(1), which makes it unlawful “for any person to sell or offer to sell a security ... unless . . .

A. WOJNOWSKI, Jr. v. STATE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION,, 98 So. 3d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . FINRA”) arbitration award finding that Appellant sold unregistered securities in violation of section 517.07 . . . 517.301; (2) as to violation of [chapter] 517, Respondents sold unregulated securities in violation of § 517.07 . . . ... to have violated provisions of Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, specifically Section 517.301 and 517.07 . . . Finally, the arbitration award found that Appellant violated section 517.07, Florida Statutes, by selling . . .

VENEZIA v. SUNRISE VIEW, INC. a a, 93 So. 3d 1051 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 517.07(1), Fla. . . .

GLK, L. P. v. FOUR SEASONS HOTEL LIMITED II,, 22 So. 3d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . complaint alleging that the purchased units qualify as securities and that the sale violated sections 517.07 . . .

In A. WILLIAMS, A. v. A., 370 B.R. 397 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Section 517.07, Florida Statutes, further provides in pertinent part: (1) It is unlawful and a violation . . . ANN. § 517.07(1) and (2) (West 2005). . . . state of Florida, and therefore the Securities Transaction with Plaintiff was a direct violation of § 517.07 . . . on behalf of Debtor and Magnolia-LTC, Inc., was insufficient to conform with the requirements of § 517.07 . . . As a result, because Debtor violated § 517.07, Florida Statutes, a state securities law, and because . . .

DILLON, L. I. G. El A. A. D. D. S. P. A. v. AXXSYS INT L, INC. f. k. a. Co. M., 185 F. App'x 823 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . Securities and Investor Protection Act (“FSIPA”) §§ 517.07, 517.211; (III) misrepresentations in connection . . . Stat. § 517.07(1) (2005). . . . Securities and Investor Protection Act (“FSIPA”) §§ 517.07, 517.211. . . . Stat. § 517.07 (2005). . . . .

PINNACLE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. a v. AMERICAN FAMILY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a v., 417 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (D. Minn. 2006)

. . . . § 517.07(1); Minn.Stat. § 80A.08. . . . Stat. § 517.07 does not require registration of such securities”). Accord Lillard v. . . .

DILLON, v. AXXSYS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 385 F. Supp. 2d 1307 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . ), Florida Statutes, part of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act (“FSI-PA”), Section 517.07 . . . support a jury verdict in the plaintiffs’ favor on the elements of their claim of violation of [FSIPA] § 517.07 . . . former Section 517.211 into Sections 517.211(1) and (2), the former directed to violations of Section 517.07 . . . one, fraudulent inducement; claim two, the sale of unregistered securities in violation of Section 517.07 . . . 517.211 Remedies available in cases of unlawful sale.— (1) Every sale made in violation of either s. 517.07 . . .

MUSOLINO, v. YESHIVA MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ, a a N. C. a, 137 F. App'x 321 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . Stat. § 517.07 are barred by the statute of limitations; the stocks were exempt transactions under Fla . . . Stat. § 517.07; and the district court erred by not concluding that reliance is an element of a claim . . . Stat. § 517.07 requires every security sold in Florida to be registered with the Florida Department of . . . Stat. § 517.07, the district court concluded that Machzikei Hadas was liable under Fla. . . . Stat. § 517.07, and because the remedy for a violation of Fla. Stat. § 517.07 and Fla. . . .

In S. SIMON, D. P. J. v. S., 311 B.R. 641 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . . §§ 517.07, 517.211, and 517.303. . . .

GRIPPO, v. E. PERAZZO, T. S. C., 357 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . Stat. ch. 517.07; (9) violation of the broker registration provisions of the Florida Securities and Investor . . .

KAHAN NOVOA v. SAFRA NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK,, 313 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (S.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . §§ 517.301, 517.07, 517.211; Allen v. . . . Oil Corp., 232 So.2d 200, 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970) (sales or offers for sale are not actionable under 517.07 . . .

SHIELDS COMPANY, s v. G. BRIGHT, s, 254 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . Claimants William Bright and Jean Bright, and violated Florida Statutes sections 517.12(1), 517.12(11), 517.07 . . . Respondent violated Florida Statutes sections 517.12(1), 517.07(1), 517.12(5), 517.12(11), Rules 3E-600.002 . . . For ease of reference, the Court includes the following: Florida Statute 517.07(1) states: It is unlawful . . .

MOECKER, v. ANTOINE, M., 845 So. 2d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 517.07(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . Section 517.061 provides that the registration requirements of section 517.07 do not apply to, among . . .

TEMPLE, A. G. J. R. C. B. v. L. D. GORMAN, 201 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . . § 517.07 (Supp.2001). . . . As a result, Fla.Stat. § 517.07 does not require registration of such securities. . . .

In GOLDBRONN, B. v., 263 B.R. 347 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . of fact: that the defendant “violated the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act, Sections 517.07 . . . In this case, the arbitration panel found that the defendant violated Sections 517.07 and 517.301, Florida . . . The arbitration panel also determined that the securities were unregistered in violation of Section 517.07 . . .

HILLIARD v. H. BLACK,, 125 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (N.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . Finance and that Defendants did not provide a prospectus of these securities as required by section 517.07 . . .

J. BUEHLER, Jr. v. LTI INTERNATIONAL, INC. a n k a, 762 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . The section lays out the remedies for plaintiffs who purchased from sellers who violate section 517.07 . . .

BOOKHARDT, v. STATE, 710 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 517.07, Fla. Stat. . § 517.12, Fla. Stat. .§ 517.301, Fla. Stat. . . .

BUTTERWORTH, v. QUICK REILLY, INC., 998 F. Supp. 1404 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . Section 517.211 of the Florida Statutes states that: Every sale made in violation of either s. 517.07 . . .

GREATER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. d b a d b a D. L. v. STATE F., 689 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . §§ 517.07; 517.081, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. W. A. v. R. DAVIS, B. E. C. C. S. C. L. H., 897 F. Supp. 783 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . . § 517.07 (1994), which prohibits the sale of unregistered securities, and Fla.Stat. § 517.301 (1994 . . .

OSBORNE STERN AND COMPANY, INC. W. v. DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE, DIVISION OF SECURITIES AND INVESTOR PROTECTION,, 647 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . section 517.161, Florida Statutes (1989), based upon appellants’ having violated sections 517.12(1), 517.07 . . . introducing evidence of mitigating circumstances as to the alleged violations of sections 517.12(1), 517.07 . . . Section 517.07 (1989), Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: Registration of securities. — No . . .

P. SCHEURENBRAND L. E. S. Sr. R. A. v. WOOD GUNDY CORP., 8 F.3d 1547 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 517.07 and 517.081 (West 1988), and demand the concomitant right of rescission under section 517.211 . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 517.07. . . .

In SM LIMITED, a, 160 B.R. 202 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 517.07. See also 11 U.S.C. § 1145. . . .

K. BISSELL, v. STATE STATE v. F. DONOHUE,, 605 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . (4), one count of conspiracy to commit racketeering; § 817.034(4), two counts of organized fraud; § 517.07 . . .

FIREMAN S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, v. M. VENTO,, 586 So. 2d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . commissioner stating that the securities of the Crossings had not been registered pursuant to section 517.07 . . . Unless, it was a seller, it would not be subject to the provisions of section 517.07. . . . seller, or agent of the seller of the limited partnership for purposes of liability under sections 517.07 . . . Moreover, section 517.07 contains various exceptions and exclusions which may protect Fireman’s should . . .

SKURNICK, v. Al AINSWORTH,, 591 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1991)

. . . Statutes (1989), which provides, in pertinent part, that “[e]very sale made in violation of either s. 517.07 . . .

WILEY P. a v. HUGHES CAPITAL CORPORATION,, 746 F. Supp. 1264 (D.N.J. 1990)

. . . . § 517.07. The Plaintiffs concede the securities of Hughes Capital were registered in Florida. . . .

Al AINSWORTH, v. SKURNICK,, 909 F.2d 456 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . Florida Statute § 517.211 provides that “Every sale made in violation of either Section 517.07 or Section . . .

P. BIRNHOLZ, P. P. A. v. WALL STREET FUND, INC. a, 904 F.2d 567 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . AVOIDING LIABILITY TO INVESTORS UNDER § 517.211 FOR THE SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF § 517.07 . . . AVOIDING LIABILITY TO INVESTORS UNDER § 517.211 FOR THE SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF § 517.07 . . . according to § 517.061(19), Fla.Stat. (1978 Supp.), which provided that the registration provisions of § 517.07 . . . sold in any exempt transaction. 3- The original statute provided: "The registration provisions of s. 517.07 . . .

HALL DADELAND TOWERS ASSOCIATES v. W. HARDEMAN, Jr. M. v. HALL SECURITIES CORPORATION,, 736 F. Supp. 1422 (N.D. Tex. 1990)

. . . . § 517.07 (1987). . . . Ann. § 517.07. . . . Pursuant to § 517.211(1), sales in violation of § 517.07 “may be rescinded at the election of the purchaser . . .

P. BIRNHOLZ, v. WALL STREET FUND, INC., 559 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 1990)

. . . AVOIDING LIABILITY TO INVESTORS UNDER § 517.211 FOR THE SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF § 517.07 . . . between October, 1980, and March, 1985, were sold in violation of the registration requirements of § 517.07 . . . Stat. (1978 Supp.), which provided that the registration provisions of § 517.07 did not apply to the . . . of s. 517.07 do not apply to any of the following transactions: (19) The sale of securities pursuant . . .

R. FOX, v. STATE, 554 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . .-014, 517.07, 517.12 and 517.301, Fla.Stat. . . .

P. BIRNHOLZ, P. P. A. v. WALL STREET FUND, INC. a, 880 F.2d 335 (11th Cir. 1989)

. . . between October, 1980, and March, 1985, were sold in violation of the registration requirements of § 517.07 . . . according to § 517.061(19), Fla.Stat. (1978 Supp.), which provided that the registration provisions of § 517.07 . . . AVOIDING LIABILITY TO INVESTORS UNDER § 517.211 FOR THE SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES IN VIOLATION OF § 517.07 . . . The original statute provided: The registration provisions of s. 517.07 do not apply to any of the following . . .

BARNEBEY, v. E. F. HUTTON CO., 715 F. Supp. 1512 (M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . Miller’s motion for summary judgment on Count I (non-registration under Section 517.07, Florida Statutes . . . Plaintiffs subscribing, Florida law provided for exemption from the registration requirements of Section 517.07 . . . liability provision for unlawful sales of unregistered securities: “Every sale made in violation of ... s. 517.07 . . . Section 517.07 simply provides that it is unlawful to sell an unregistered security, unless the sale . . . Section 301 of the Oklahoma Securities Act (parallel to F.S.A. § 517.07) simply provides: It is unlawful . . .

M. SCHNEBERGER, v. W. WHEELER, a UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, A v. J. PLOTNER, v. WHEELER, A. Co., 859 F.2d 1477 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . Trust violated Fla.Stat. section 517.07 and Fla.Stat. section 517.301. . . .

PALM COURT, INC. v. DURHAM,, 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 14 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . Regulation “D”, 17 CFR section 230.506. (5) PCI sold unregistered securities in violation of section 517.07 . . .

O KILPATRICK, v. R. OLIFF,, 519 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . .-301, Fla.Stat., and 517.07, Fla.Stat. . . .

OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER v. FLORIDA SEAFOOD BROKERS, INC., 27 Fla. Supp. 2d 209 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . Richards violated Section 517.07, Florida Statutes (1986 Supp.) . . .

WHIGHAM, v. W. MUEHL, s, 500 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . .— (1) Every sale made in violation of either s.517.07 or s.517.12 may be rescinded at the election of . . .

M. WEINBERG, v. D. PENNINGTON, a k a V., 462 So. 2d 862 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Stat. (1981), and the sale of unregistered securities in violation of § 517.07, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . Reversed and remanded. .The registration provisions of s. 517.07 do not apply to any of the following . . .

YEOMANS v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE, DIVISION OF SECURITIES, RATTET d b a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE, DIVISION OF SECURITIES,, 452 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The plans were admittedly not registered as securities under Sec. 517.07 and the appellants were not . . .

STATE v. ROBARGE,, 450 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1984)

. . . Based on the legislature’s clear directive, we construed section 517.07 in conformity with section 517.17 . . . If we had followed the Baeumel rule in Buchman in interpreting section 517.07, we would have not only . . . weapon proviso in this statute constituted "an exception in a subsequent clause” under Beaumel. .§ 517.07 . . .

EATON, v. COAL PAR OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC., 580 F. Supp. 572 (S.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . . § 517.07, be and the same is hereby DENIED. C. . . .

D. NELSON, v. STATE A. LEWIS, FRANKLIN CAPITAL CORP. v. STATE A. LEWIS,, 441 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 517.07, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

STATE v. OXX,, 417 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Hough-taling, 181 So.2d 636 (Fla.1965) (section 517.07 prohibiting the sale of unregistered securities . . .

SPEIGHTS, v. STATE, 414 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Buchman, 361 So.2d 692 (Fla.1978) the court examined Section 517.07, Florida Statutes (Supp.1976), which . . . Section 517.07, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1976), states: Registration of securities. — No securities except . . .

KAUFMAN, v. STATE, 400 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . As to the latter alleged deficiency, we note that Sections 517.07 and 517.17, Florida Statutes (1973) . . .

MARY S. KRECH TRUST S. v. LAKES APARTMENTS, 642 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . Counts II, III, VII alleged violations of Florida Statutes §§ 517.07, 517.21 and 517.-301. . . .

H. CONARD v. STATE, 397 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . fraudulently selling securities, and one count of scheming to defraud each, in violations of sections 517.07 . . .

RUDD, v. STATE, 386 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . determinative of this appeal is whether there was a sale of a security within the contemplation of section 517.07 . . .

L. STOWELL, T. v. TED S. FINKEL INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. a S. H. a a H. BECK, v. S. MOFSKY,, 489 F. Supp. 1209 (S.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . units as securities in violation of Sections 12(1) and 12(5) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 517.07 . . . Section 517.07 of the State Act provides that no securities except those exempt from registration may . . . Every sale in violation of Section 517.07 is voidable at the election of the purchaser for the amount . . . Section 517.07 defines the standard of conduct and Section 517.021 provides the remedy for violations . . .

THOMPSON, v. STATE, 378 So. 2d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . They, too, argued that because Section 517.07 forbids sales of unregistered securities unless the securities . . . Section 517.07, however, makes only general reference to exemptions; specific exemptions are listed in . . .

LE CHATEAU ROYAL CORPORATION, v. PANTALEO,, 370 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 517.07, Florida Statutes (1973), prohibits the sale of any securities within the State (except . . .

BROWN, v. H. RAIRIGH C. W., 363 So. 2d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Undismayed, he then claimed that he was sold an unregistered security in violation of Section 517.07 . . .

STATE v. BUCHMAN, 361 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1978)

. . . Section 517.07, Florida Statutes, forbids the sale of unregistered securities in this State unless the . . . an exemption as an element of the offense of sale of an unregistered security, as defined in Section 517.07 . . .

KRUTEL, D. A J A v. STOLBERG,, 356 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Florida Statutes (1975), for alleged violation of provisions against sale of unregistered stock (§ 517.07 . . .

STATE v. FRIED,, 357 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . herein, had sold two Triex Corporation promissory notes to James Burleson, in violation of Section 517.07 . . .

G. THIELE G. v. DAVIDSON, a H., 440 F. Supp. 585 (M.D. Fla. 1977)

. . . Section 517.07 of the Florida Statutes in effect at the time the stock was transferred in 1974 to the . . . Reading Section 517.21 in pari materia with 517.07, it would appear that a claim for a sale in violation . . . of 517.07 would accrue when the security in question is “sold”. . . .

F. SPARKS, v. STATE, 256 So. 2d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . Section 517.07, F.S.A.; (2) sale of securities by an unregistered dealer, F.S. . . .

FLORIDA PEACH CORPORATION, Co- Op, a v. BARRON, a, 249 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . . §§ 517.07 and 517.12, F.S.A.) . . .

BOND v. KOSCOT INTERPLANETARY, INC. a W. a, 246 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . unless such security shall have been registered within the meaning of the law (Sections 517.02(1), 517.07 . . .

A. CAIN, v. J. SOLOMON a, 213 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . The complaint alleged that the sale was void because it was an illegal sale under § 517.07 Fla.Stat.: . . .

J. BARABAN, v. MANATEE NATIONAL BANK OF BRADENTON, a, 212 So. 2d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Sections 517.07 and 517.12 require the sellers of certain kinds of securities, including the ones involved . . .

STATE v. S. HOUGHTALING, M. E., 181 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 1965)

. . . Sec. 517.07, F.S.A., which forbids the sale of certain securities which have not been registered with . . . Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 889, which held that scienter was a necessary element in prosecutions under Sec. 517.07 . . . reversed as to Count Two, reasoning as follows: (1) that the Smith case specifically referred only to Sec. 517.07 . . . Section 517.07, F.S.A. . . .

STATE v. S. HOUGHTALING, M. E., 173 So. 2d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Appellees were informed against, charged with sale of unregistered securities, in violation of § 517.07 . . . order as it relates to the first count, charging sale of unregistered securities in violation of § 517.07 . . . contended scienter is not a needed element in a charge of selling unregistered securities in violation of § 517.07 . . . stated the order appealed from is affirmed in quashing the first count charging an offense under § 517.07 . . .

STATE v. W. SMITH,, 151 So. 2d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . Section 517.07, F.S.A. which provides: “No securities except of a class exempt under any of the provisions . . .

L. HAMMOND, v. STATE, 151 So. 2d 872 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . the securities of such security holders or claims of such creditors * * [Emphasis supplied] Section 517.07 . . .

DeBLASE v. WINTER GARDEN CO- OPERATIVE APARTMENTS, INC. a, 142 So. 2d 307 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . . § 517.07 provides: “No securities except of a class exempt under any of the provisions of § 517.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HILL, 123 U.S. 681 (U.S. 1887)

. . . .: $517.07, and possibly a small amount of interest ; and as the jurisdiction of this court in an action . . . naturalization fees to the other fees, the two together exceeded the clerk’s maximum allowance by the amount of $517.07 . . . not exceed $5000, because in no event could there have been a recovery in the action of more than $517.07 . . .