The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 520
RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 520.70

520.70 Employee of the seller.—

(1) No individual may concurrently represent more than one home improvement finance seller in the solicitation or negotiation of any home improvement contract from an owner. The use of a contract form which fails to disclose a named home improvement finance seller is prohibited. No employee of a seller may be authorized to select a home improvement finance seller on behalf of the owner.

(2) No employee of the seller shall accept or pay any compensation on or for a home improvement transaction other than from or for the home improvement finance seller represented with respect to the transaction.

History.—s. 1, ch. 69-44; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 21, ch. 80-256; s. 2, ch. 81-318; s. 21, ch. 87-91; ss. 21, 35, 36, ch. 90-103; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 520.70 on Google Scholar

F.S. 520.70 on Casetext

Amendments to 520.70

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 520.70

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 520.70.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ZINK, v. A. LOMBARDI, C., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1013 (W.D. Mo. 2015)

. . . . §§ 520.70, 530. . . .

J. ROBERTS, v. R. BOWEN,, 652 F. Supp. 276 (N.D. Iowa 1986)

. . . compensation for 121.4 hours of work at a rate of $125.00 per hour, or $15,175.00, in addition to $520.70 . . .

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. v. A. ZIARNO, T. Co., 273 F.2d 645 (2d Cir. 1960)

. . . been commenced in the New York State courts, except that the property damage claimed was reduced to $520.70 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN WEBSTER PARISH, LA., 61 F. Supp. 545 (W.D. La. 1945)

. . . West quarter, and lot Seventeen of Section Seven, containing Five hundred and twenty 70/100 acres (520.70 . . . The other imperfection detected is that the sum of the acreage is 520.70 and not 520.71 acres. . . . any other of the general public that a township and range are now shown, that the content is exactly 520.70 . . . acres, and that it is the East % plus the S.W. % that are there indicated to make the 520.70 acres. . . . This is the third proof that the total of 520.70 acres is reached by the addition of the “East half” . . .

CONNECTICUT MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. EATON,, 218 F. 206 (D. Conn. 1914)

. . . applied to payment of premiums, and the purchase of paid-up insurance and annuities amounting to $29,-520.70 . . .