Cases from cite.case.law:

BAUER, d b a v. DILIB, INC. a d b a, 16 So. 3d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Second, the plaintiff argues that, according to section 542.16, Florida Statutes (2007), section 542.335 . . . However, this incomplete excerpt from section 542.16 distorts the Legislature’s stated purpose. . . . Section 542.16’s complete language states: The Legislature declares it to be the pui’pose of [the Florida . . . intent of the Legislature that this act be liberally construed to accomplish its beneficial purpose. § 542.16 . . .

n MONTA EZ A. v. BEARD,, 344 F. App'x 833 (3d Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 542.16(b) (requiring that prison wardens ensure that assistance is available for inmates who are . . .

KANE, v. ZUERCHER,, 344 F. App'x 267 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 542.10 to 542.16. . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. WHITE,, 309 F. App'x 38 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16; United States v. Engs, 884 F.2d 894, 897 (7th Cir.1989); Maynard v. . . .

OKPALA, v. D. B. DREW, M. M. C. FCI,, 248 F. App'x 72 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 542.10, 542.11-542.16, and the BOP Program Statement 1330.7, in order to exhaust administrative . . .

UNITED STATES v. FROSCH, f k a, 496 F. Supp. 2d 1018 (S.D. Iowa 2007)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16). . . .

A. BAEZ, v. KAHANOWICZ,, 469 F. Supp. 2d 171 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . . § 542.16, it does not amount to a special circumstance justifying departure from the exhaustion requirement . . .

COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES, A v. NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION,, 466 F.3d 134 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . . § 542.16, complimentary services, id. § 542.17, and many other aspects of gaming. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TINDALL,, 455 F.3d 885 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16, and after properly exhausting these administrative remedies, an inmate may seek judicial . . .

RAMOS, v. V. SMITH,, 187 F. App'x 152 (3d Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 542.16(b). . . . See 28 C.F.R. § 542.16(a). . . .

STEELE, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Pa, 100 F. App'x 773 (10th Cir. 2004)

. . . for which other administrative procedures have been established, including tort claims.” 28 C.F.R § 542.16 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PARDUE,, 363 F.3d 695 (8th Cir. 2004)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH, 318 F. Supp. 2d 875 (C.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16, prisoners may then seek judicial review of any pre-sentence custody credit determination . . .

DUCK TOURS SEAFARI, INC. v. THE CITY OF KEY WEST,, 875 So. 2d 650 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See §§ 542.16, 542.18, 542.19, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. FRANKLIN, Jr., 64 F. App'x 965 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16(1997), and is barred from raising the issue before this Court. . . .

UNITED STATES v. OLUSHINA,, 63 F. App'x 553 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1990)); see also Martinez v. . . .

RENDELMAN, v. UNITED STATES Lt., 32 F. App'x 804 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16. . . .

JIMENEZ, v. WARDEN, FDIC, FORT DEVENS, MASSACHUSETTS,, 147 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D. Mass. 2001)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16, judicial review may be obtained by the filing of a habeas corpus petition under 28 . . .

NYHUIS, v. RENO, BOP, 204 F.3d 65 (3d Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 542.16(a). . . . Id. § 542.16(b). . . .

N. ROGERS, v. UNITED STATES, 180 F.3d 349 (1st Cir. 1999)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16, prisoners may then seek judicial review of the request for designation by filing . . . Once administrative remedies are exhausted, see 28 C.F.R. §§ 542.10-542.16, prisoners may then seek judicial . . .

DELIMA, v. UNITED STATES, 41 F. Supp. 2d 359 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1993) before seeking relief in the district court.”) . . .

ALL CARE NURSING SERVICE, INC. v. HIGH TECH STAFFING SERVICES, INC. ALL CARE NURSING SERVICE, INC. A v. BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. NME, 135 F.3d 740 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . . §§ 542.16 (Florida antitrust laws complement federal antitrust laws), 542.18 (analogous to § 1 of the . . .

GARCIA v. V. PUGH, 948 F. Supp. 20 (E.D. Pa. 1996)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16. . . .

MACK, v. BRISTOL- MYERS SQUIBB CO. Co., 673 So. 2d 100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 542.16, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

UNITED STATES v. McGEE,, 60 F.3d 1266 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1990); and prisoners have been able to seek judicial review of these computations . . .

VON KAHL, v. J. BRENNAN,, 855 F. Supp. 1413 (M.D. Pa. 1994)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1987). . . .

A. MARTINEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 19 F.3d 97 (2d Cir. 1994)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1993) before seeking relief in the district court. See id. at 1355. . . .

J. GREENBERG, M. D. v. MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF GREATER MIAMI, INC., 629 So. 2d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . .” § 542.16, Fla.Stat. (1991); Hackett, 422 So.2d at 986. The complaint, in sum, alleges that Mt. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GENTRY A., 805 F. Supp. 1030 (S.D. Ga. 1992)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16. The provisions of §§ 542.10-542.16 were interpreted in United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESCOBAR a k a La a k a a k a, 803 F. Supp. 611 (E.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . . § 542.16 (West 1988); Mo.R.Civ.Proc. 51.05 (West 1976 & Supp.1992); Mont.Code Ann. § 3-1-804 (1991) . . .

UNITED STATES v. WESTMORELAND,, 974 F.2d 736 (6th Cir. 1992)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1990); Lucas, supra, at 1557, and prisoners have been able to seek judicial review . . .

D. VETETO, v. H. G. MILLER,, 829 F. Supp. 1486 (M.D. Pa. 1992)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 First, ''[ijnmates shall informally present their complaints to staff, and staff shall . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOWLING,, 962 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1992)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1990), and, once they have exhausted their administrative remedies; prisoners may . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILSON, 503 U.S. 329 (U.S. 1992)

. . . have afforded prisoners administrative review of the computation of their credits, see 28 CFR §§542.10-542.16 . . .

PEREZ- CARABALLO v. UNITED STATES, 784 F. Supp. 941 (D.P.R. 1991)

. . . .-10-542.16. . . . entitled to redress using the Administrative Remedy Procedure established under 28 C.F.R. §§ 542.10-542.16 . . .

TERRELL, v. R. D. BREWER, C., 935 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1991)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1990), he will be free to refile his suit against defendant Phillips, but not against . . .

WARNER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CITY OF NICEVILLE, a a, 581 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . and because Warner had failed to allege a violation of the Florida Anti-Trust Act of 1980, Section 542.16 . . .

UNITED STATES v. YOUNG, Jr., 739 F. Supp. 943 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1989). . . .

MEAGHER, v. DUGGER,, 737 F. Supp. 641 (S.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16, and that he has unsuccessfully appealed to the National Appeals Board pursuant to . . .

R. BAUER, v. G. L. HENMAN,, 731 F. Supp. 903 (S.D. Ill. 1990)

. . . These procedures are set out in 28 C.F.R. secs. 542.11-542.16, and in Bureau of Prisons Program Statement . . .

BROWN, v. H. RISON,, 895 F.2d 533 (9th Cir. 1990)

. . . . §§ 542.10— 542.16 (1987). Each step has time deadlines. . . .

PERRY, v. A. BEELER,, 725 F. Supp. 391 (N.D. Ill. 1989)

. . . . §§ 542.10 to 542.16 (1988). . . .

ALL CARE NURSING SERVICE, INC. v. BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. P. D. Q. NURSE, INC. v. SOUTH FLORIDA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., 887 F.2d 1535 (11th Cir. 1989)

. . . . §§ 542.16 (Florida antitrust laws complement federal antitrust laws), 542.18 (provision analogous to . . .

THORNBURGH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, v. ABBOTT, 490 U.S. 401 (U.S. 1989)

. . . See §§542.10 to 542.16. . . .

BOUNOS, v. A. F. BEELER, MCC, 695 F. Supp. 407 (N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 before he can bring a Section 2255 lawsuit; accord, such other cases as United States . . .

ADKINS, v. T. C. MARTIN,, 699 F. Supp. 1510 (W.D. Okla. 1988)

. . . Section 542.10-542.16 through the Regional Director, Bureau of Prisons to the General Counsel for the . . .

LYONS, v. U. S. MARSHALS, 840 F.2d 202 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . .-10-542.16 (1987). . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. HODGE,, 674 F. Supp. 585 (N.D. Ohio 1987)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16, “[t]he Bureau of Prisons has established an Administrative Eem-edy procedure through . . . R. §§ 542.10-542.16 and, thus, his claim is premature. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BERRY,, 814 F.2d 1406 (9th Cir. 1987)

. . . .-10-542.16 (1986), before seeking relief in federal court. Chua Han Mow, 730 F.2d at 1313-14. . . .

S. HESSBROOK, v. M. C. LENNON, Jr. D. A. J., 777 F.2d 999 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16. . . . .

ANDERSON v. G. MILLER,, 772 F.2d 375 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§ 542.11-542.16 and in BOP Program Statement (“PS”) 1330.7 (October 2, 1979). . . . inmate’s request for copies of dispositions requested under section 8 of this Program Statement (§ 542.16 . . .

CHUA HAN MOW, v. UNITED STATES, 730 F.2d 1308 (9th Cir. 1984)

. . . . §§ 542.10-542.16 (1981). . . .

I. SABATES, M. D. I. M. D. P. A. v. INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, INC. a a a d b a Jr., 450 So. 2d 514 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See § 542.16, Fla.Stat. (1981) (purpose of Florida Antitrust Act is to complement federal antitrust legislation . . .

E. HACKETT, M. D. E. M. D. P. A. v. METROPOLITAN GENERAL HOSPITAL, a, 422 So. 2d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . .” § 542.16, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

SECURITY TITLE ABSTRACT, INC. v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY H., 414 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . While we agree with the trial court that in the spirit of free enterprise (see Section 542.16, Florida . . .

In WALTRIP, Jr., 260 F. Supp. 448 (E.D. Va. 1966)

. . . National Bank as the holder of a lien upon the 1963 Volkswagen, with the amount of the debt being $542.16 . . .