Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 542.28 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 542.28 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 542.28

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 542
COMBINATIONS RESTRICTING TRADE OR COMMERCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 542.28
542.28 Civil investigative demand.
(1) Whenever the Attorney General, or a state attorney with appropriate jurisdiction and with the written consent of the Attorney General, has reason to believe that any person may be in possession, custody, or control of any documentary material, or may have any information, which documentary material or information is relevant to a civil antitrust investigation authorized by s. 542.27(3), the Attorney General or such state attorney may, prior to the institution of a civil or criminal proceeding thereon, issue in writing and cause to be served upon such person a civil investigative demand requiring such person to:
(a) Produce such documentary material for inspection and copying or reproduction;
(b) Answer, under oath and in writing, written interrogatories;
(c) Give sworn oral testimony concerning the documentary material or information; or
(d) Furnish any combination of such material, answers, or testimony.
(2) The demand shall:
(a) Be served upon the person in the manner required for service of process in this state or by certified mail showing receipt by the addressee or by the authorized agent of the addressee.
(b) State the nature of the conduct which constitutes the violation of this chapter or of the federal antitrust laws and which is alleged to have occurred or to be imminent.
(c) Describe the class or classes of documentary material to be produced thereunder with such definiteness and certainty as to permit such materials to be reasonably identified.
(d) Prescribe a date and time at which the person must appear to testify, under oath or affirmation, or by which the person must answer written interrogatories or produce the documentary material for inspection or copying; however, such date shall not be earlier than 30 days from the date of service of the investigative demand.
(e) Specify a place for the taking of testimony or for the submission of answers to interrogatories and identify the person who is to take custody of any documentary material. Inspection and copying of documentary material shall be carried out at the place where the documentary material is located or at such other place as may be thereafter agreed to by the person and such designated custodian. Upon written agreement between the person and the designated custodian, copies may be substituted for original documents.
(3) No such demand shall require the production of any documentary material, the submission of any answers to written interrogatories, or the giving of any oral testimony if such material, answers, or testimony would be protected from disclosure under:
(a) The standards applicable to subpoenas or subpoenas duces tecum issued by a court of this state in aid of a grand jury investigation; or
(b) The standards applicable to a discovery request under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, to the extent that the application of such standards to any such demand is appropriate and consistent with the provisions and purposes of this chapter.
(4) Nothing in this section, however, shall limit the power of the Attorney General or a state attorney to require the appearance of witnesses or production of documents or other tangible evidence located outside the state.
(5) Within 30 days after the service of an investigative demand upon any person or at any time before the return date specified therein, whichever period is longer, the person served may file in the circuit court in and for the county in which the person resides or transacts business, and serve upon the Attorney General or state attorney, a petition for an order of the court modifying or setting aside the demand. The time allowed for compliance in whole or in part with the demand as deemed proper and ordered by the court shall not run while the petition is pending before the court. The petition shall specify each ground upon which the petitioner relies in seeking relief and may be based upon the failure of the demand to comply with the provisions of this chapter or upon any constitutional or other legal right or privilege of such person.
(6) In case of the failure of any person to comply in whole or in part with a written investigative demand and when such person has not filed a petition under subsection (5), any circuit court of this state, upon application of the Attorney General or state attorney, may issue an order requiring compliance. The failure to obey the order of the court shall be punishable as a contempt of court.
(7) The examination of all witnesses under this section shall be conducted by the Attorney General, or a state attorney with appropriate jurisdiction, before an officer authorized to administer oaths in this state. The testimony shall be taken stenographically or by a sound-recording device. Any person compelled to appear under a demand for oral testimony pursuant to this section may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel. Counsel may advise such person, in confidence, either upon the request of such person or upon counsel’s own initiative, with respect to any question asked of such person. Such person or counsel may object on the record to any question, in whole or in part, and shall briefly state for the record the reason for any such objection. If such person refuses to answer any question, the person conducting the examination may petition the circuit court as provided by subsection (11).
(8) When the testimony is fully transcribed, the person conducting the deposition shall afford the witness, and counsel if any, a reasonable opportunity to examine the transcript, and the transcript shall be read to or by the witness, unless such examination and reading is waived by the witness. Any changes in form or substance which the witness desires to make shall be entered and identified upon the transcript by the officer, the Attorney General, or a state attorney, with a statement of the reasons given by the witness for making such changes. The transcript shall then be signed by the witness unless the witness waives the signing in writing, is ill, cannot be found, or refuses to sign. If the transcript is not signed by the witness within 30 days of his or her being afforded a reasonable opportunity to examine it, the person conducting the examination shall sign it and state on the record the fact of the waiver, illness, absence of the witness, or refusal to sign, together with the reason, if any, given therefor. Any person required to testify or to submit documentary evidence is entitled, on payment of reasonable costs, to procure a copy of any document produced by such person and of his or her own testimony as stenographically reported or, in the case of a deposition, as reduced to writing by or under the direction of the person taking the deposition.
(9) Notwithstanding s. 119.07(1), it is the duty of the Attorney General or a state attorney to maintain the secrecy of all evidence, testimony, documents, work product, or other results of such investigative demand. However, the Attorney General or state attorney may disclose such investigative evidence to:
(a) Any court or tribunal in this state; or
(b) Other law enforcement authorities of the Federal Government or other state governments that have restrictions governing confidentiality similar to those contained in this subsection.
(10) The Attorney General shall have the authority to stipulate to protective orders with respect to documents and information submitted in response to an investigative demand under this section.
(11) The Attorney General or a state attorney may request that any natural person who refuses to comply with any provisions of this section on the ground that the testimony or documents may incriminate him or her be ordered by the circuit court to provide the testimony or the documents. Except in a prosecution for perjury, a natural person who complies with a court order to provide testimony or documents after asserting a privilege against self-incrimination to which he or she is entitled by law may not be subject to a criminal proceeding or to the civil penalty of s. 542.21(1), with respect to the transaction to which he or she is required to testify or produce documents. Any natural person who fails to comply with such a court order to testify or produce documents may be adjudged in contempt and imprisoned until the time the person purges himself or herself of the contempt.
(12) While in the possession of the custodian, documentary material, answers to interrogatories, and transcripts of oral testimony shall be available, under such reasonable terms and conditions as the Attorney General or a state attorney shall prescribe, for examination by the person who produced such materials or answers, or that person’s duly authorized representative.
(13) Nothing contained in this section shall impair the authority of the Attorney General or state attorney to:
(a) Institute a civil proceeding under s. 542.22;
(b) Lay before a grand jury of this state evidence concerning a violation of this chapter;
(c) Invoke the power of a court to compel the production of evidence before a grand jury; or
(d) File a civil complaint or criminal indictment alleging a violation of this chapter.
(14)(a) No person, knowing or having reason to believe that a demand pursuant to this section is pending, shall:
1. Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or thing with the purpose of impairing its verity or availability in such proceeding or investigation; or
2. Make, present, or use any record, document, or thing, knowing it to be false.
(b) Any person who violates a provision of this subsection is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(15) When copies of documentary material made available pursuant to an investigative demand are no longer required for use in a pending proceeding or, absent any pending proceeding, are no longer required in connection with the investigation for which they were demanded, or at the end of 24 months following the date when the material was made available, whichever is sooner, all copies of the material shall be returned, unless a request to extend the period beyond 24 months has been filed in the court in which a request for an order compelling compliance pursuant to subsection (6) could be filed. This subsection does not require the return of any copies of the documentary material that have passed into the control of any court or grand jury.
History.s. 1, ch. 80-28; s. 2, ch. 84-146; s. 1, ch. 92-24; s. 342, ch. 96-406; s. 1173, ch. 97-103.

F.S. 542.28 on Google Scholar

F.S. 542.28 on Casetext

Amendments to 542.28


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 542.28
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S542.28 14a1 - EVIDENCE-DESTROYING - TAMPER W RECORDS DOC INVSTG OF TRADE COMMERCE - F: T
S542.28 14a2 - FRAUD - PRODUCE FALSE REC DOC FOR TRADE INVESTIGATION - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In A. WCISLAK L. s, 417 B.R. 24 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009)

. . . showing that to repair the vehicle’s shocks and brakes and replace the tires would cost respectively, $542.28 . . . Wcislak, are respectively $542.28 and $857.04. . . .

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, H. LLC, v. CRIST,, 331 F.3d 1177 (11th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 542.28. . . . Stat. § 542.28(3). . . . Stat. § 542.28(3). . . . Stat. § 542.28(3)(a). . . . Stat. § 542.28(3)(b). . . .

GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES, INC. v. A. BUTTERWORTH,, 685 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . petition to set aside a civil investigative demand, which the Attorney General issued pursuant to section 542.28 . . . See § 542.28(9), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . We conclude that the two standards limiting disclosure in section 542.28(3) do not protect these minutes . . . recognize that the scope of disclosure available under each of the two differing standards in section 542.28 . . .

A. BUTTERWORTH, v. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL CLUBS,, 644 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 1994)

. . . Florida Statute 542.28 does grant the Attorney General broad powers to investigate suspected violations . . . White (National League) pursuant to section 542.28, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992). . . . Section 542.28(1), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), authorizes the Attorney General to issue a civil investigative . . .

STATE A. BUTTERWORTH, v. JONES CHEMICALS, INC. FLORIDA, 148 F.R.D. 282 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 542.28(9), weigh against a finding of timeliness. See V.W. & R. Memorandum at 6-8. . . .

STATE A. BUTTERWORTH, v. LIQUID AIR CORPORATION, BOC, 147 F.R.D. 253 (M.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . The Defendants argue that the Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) provided for by Florida Statue § 542.28 . . . The Ezell holding noted that under Florida Statute § 542.28(1), CIDs may only be issued prior to the . . . By combining Section 542.28 with Rule 26(b)(3), the State seems to believe that it can conduct a broad-based . . . Judge Vinson’s reasoning identifies the potential for manipulation that § 542.28 presents. . . .

In DOMESTIC AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION. To ALL ACTIONS, 141 F.R.D. 556 (N.D. Ga. 1992)

. . . . § 542.28(9) (1988). . . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA, A. BUTTERWORTH, v. INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS, INC., 145 F.R.D. 585 (N.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . Section 542.28 gives the state Attorney General broad power, “prior to the institution” of civil or criminal . . . Under Section 542.28, the Attorney General, upon nothing more than mere “reason to believe” that a person . . . Thus, under Section 542.28, the State has extraordinary authority to bring to bear on an individual its . . . By combining Section 542.28 with Rule 26(b)(3), the State seems to believe that it can conduct a broad-based . . . aiding in anticipated litigation by attorneys for the Florida Attorney General’s office under section 542.28 . . .

In W. B. SIMONS, d b a S a k a C. a k a, 113 B.R. 942 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1990)

. . . Bank One’s Class 4.3 Claim of $327,-542.28 is secured by Note 2, the proceeds of which are its cash collateral . . .

HEWITT CONTRACTING CO. INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF FLORIDA, 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 265 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1986)

. . . Section 542.28, Florida Statutes (1983), establishes procedures for the antitrust division of the Attorney . . .

In EZELL EZELL, v. SMITH,, 446 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The issue presented on this appeal is whether section 542.28, Florida Statutes (1981), authorizing the . . . Subject to certain limitations and safeguards, section 542.28(1) authorizes the Attorney General to issue . . . where such person resides or transacts business for an order modifying or setting aside such demand. § 542.28 . . . Contending that section 542.28 was a legislatively promulgated rule of practice and procedure, appellant . . . Neither does section 542.28 purport to have anything to do with practice and procedure in the courts. . . .

H. HEWITT, v. STATE, 435 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Subsequent thereto, the Attorney General invoked the immunity provisions of Section 542.28(11) by applying . . . Appellant’s principal contention is that Section 542.28(11), which purports to grant to the Attorney . . . contravene the above constitutional provisions by providing the immunity mechanism embodied in Section 542.28 . . .

FORREST HOTEL CORP. v. FLY, 112 F. Supp. 782 (S.D. Miss. 1953)

. . . of the deficit, so that as of January 1, 1939, the books of Forrest showed a surplus deficit of $68,-542.28 . . .

MOREDOCK v. MOREDOCK, 179 F. 163 (C.C.W.D. Pa. 1910)

. . . The amount of money paid by Daniel Moredock for Samuel was $542.28, by William K. . . .