The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 552
MANUFACTURE, DISTRIBUTION, AND USE OF EXPLOSIVES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 552.101

552.101 Possession without license prohibited; exceptions.—It is unlawful for any person to possess an explosive unless he or she is the holder of a current, valid license or permit, as above provided, and possesses such explosive for the purpose covered by the license or permit held. However, there is excepted from this provision common, contract, and private carriers, as described in s. 552.12, possessed of an explosive in connection with transportation of the same in the ordinary course of their business.

History.—s. 3, ch. 29944, 1955; s. 4, ch. 59-83; s. 7, ch. 77-84; s. 794, ch. 97-103.

F.S. 552.101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 552.101 on Casetext

Amendments to 552.101

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 552.101

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 552.101.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

THOMAS, v. STATE, 294 F. Supp. 3d 576 (N.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . Gov't Code §§ 552.101 & 108(2). . . . Sections 552.101 and 552.108 provide permissive exceptions only. See Birnbaum v. All. of Am. . . . Section 552.101 provides that "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional . . . Gov't Code § 552.101. . . .

TINSLEY v. COVENANT CARE SERVICES, LLC,, 228 F. Supp. 3d 911 (E.D. Mo. 2017)

. . . Section 552.101 further provides that the physical form of the residence does not determine whether it . . . Id. at § 552.101(a)-(b). . . . Id. at § 552.101(b). The parties in this matter disagree on two important points. . . . is maintained primarily to facilitate the provisions of assistive services”); see also 29 C.F.R. § 552.101 . . .

FEZARD v. UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS,, 809 F.3d 1006 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . Section 552.101 further clarifies this definition, directing that the physical form of the residence . . . individual or a family in an apartment house, condominium or hotel may constitute a private home,” id. § 552.101 . . . Id. § 552.101(b). . . . unit is maintained primarily to facilitate the provision of assistive services”); see also 29 C.F.R. § 552.101 . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. JEWELL, U. S., 70 F. Supp. 3d 183 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . §§ 403.454, 552.101 (West 2011). . . .

TAMAYO, v. PERRY, M., 553 F. App'x 395 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . Gov’t Code §§ 508.313(a)(l)-(3) and 552.101, which together provide that information obtained and maintained . . .

UPADHYAY, v. SETHI,, 848 F. Supp. 2d 439 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . § 552.101(a) (internal quotation marks omitted). B. . . .

R. HERNANDEZ, v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI,, 820 F. Supp. 2d 781 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . The Comptroller, however, withheld dates of birth pursuant to Government Code Section 552.101. 354 S.W . . .

In COMBS,, 435 B.R. 467 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . . § 552.101(4)(a). Furthermore, “pensions may be distributed through ... . . . Reading §§ 38.1703 and 552.101(4) together, the court concluded that those statutes “required the trial . . .

W. FOWLER v. INCOR d b a, 279 F. App'x 590 (10th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 552.101(a). . Chevron deference refers to Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. . . .

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. D. FLUSTY A. Co- A. D. S. S., 545 F. Supp. 2d 624 (E.D. Mich. 2008)

. . . to be in divorce judgments pursuant to Michigan Court Rule 3.211(B)(1) and Michigan Compiled Laws § 552.101 . . . Section 552.101 simply requires that “[ejach judgment of divorce shall determine all rights of the wife . . . Laws § 552.101(2). . . .

RAWLS a v. AUGUSTINE HOME HEALTH CARE, INC., 244 F.R.D. 298 (D. Md. 2007)

. . . . § 552.101(a)-(b). . . .

LONG ISLAND CARE AT HOME, LTD. v. COKE, 551 U.S. 158 (U.S. 2007)

. . . See also § 552.101(a). . . .

ZACHARY, v. RESCARE OKLAHOMA, INC., 471 F. Supp. 2d 1183 (N.D. Okla. 2006)

. . . . § 552.101(a) (emphasis added). . . . The stipulation does not mention “domestic service employment” contained in 29 C.F.R. §§ 552.3 and 552.101 . . . See 29 C.F.R. §§ 552.3, 552.101(a). . . .

T. WELDING A. M. J. R. v. BIOS CORPORATION, a, 353 F.3d 1214 (10th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 552.101(a), (b). . . .

N. W. ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED FTU DAJO I. L. L. K. G. HFR AHD a d b a DNW Co. I- Hi- BJ s GNCD, II, AVW, CLMS, C- XTC TNT I XTC US III XTC XTC XTC DHL XTC X. DT WMF AKM, s DHR, Hi- R R SSD HHE, F R s A KMRC, La- MK TDC s R. Mt. A X St. Mt. A. Co. ANS, G. W. R. G. D. L. L. J. M. V. L. J. J. H. A. Y. A. N. B. R. S. K. N. V. D. K. R. S. N. C. K. C. J. W. J. L. M. H. T. E. K. K. C. J. A. A. N. T. R. L. B. N. A. D. J. A. N. K. C. M. D. M. T. J. D. A. T. K. A. L. T. A. G. N. T. S. L. P. A. C. T. L. S. Y. L. T. N. T. J. D. S. S. H. L. S. S. E. I. D. D. G. P. Z. J. M. Jr. B. R. J. J. C. W. Jr. s A D. a S. E. S. KQ Do DSSS a a s a D s a Le a EPZ a a a A X a v. CITY OF HOUSTON, N. W. FTU DAJO, I. AHD a d b a DNW Co. I- Hi- D a HFR L. L. K. BJ s KQ Do, S. DSSS a a s a D s a Le a EPZ a a a A X a v., 352 F.3d 162 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . Gov’t Code § 552.101. . . .

HANSMANN, v. FIDELITY INVESTMENTS INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES COMPANY, v., 326 F.3d 760 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . Laws Ann. § 552.101 was effective at that time, Pavan had every reason to believe that his parents, if . . . LAWS ANN. § 552.101 Mich. Comp. . . . Laws Ann. § 552.101 in that case. . . . Review of Michigan law indicates that annulments were intended to be included within § 552.101. . . . Further support that annulments are to be included within § 552.101 can be found in Mixon v. . . .

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. L. MULLIGAN, M. D., 210 F. Supp. 2d 894 (E.D. Mich. 2002)

. . . Laws § 552.101(2) (“Each judgment of divorce ... shall determine all rights of the wife in and to the . . .

O NEIL, M. O v. O NEIL,, 136 F. Supp. 2d 690 (E.D. Mich. 2001)

. . . . § 552.101, the Judgment of Divorce included the following: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that . . .

MADISON, v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC., 233 F.3d 175 (3d Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 552.101. . . . Neither party disputes the role 29 C.F.R. §§ 552.3 and 552.101 should play in our construction of 29 . . .

BARRIENTES, v. L. JOHNSON,, 221 F.3d 741 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . frustrated by State officers and the exception to the Texas Open Records Act, Texas Government Code § 552.101 . . . Id. § 552.101 (West 1994). . . .

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GIBBS,, 89 F. Supp. 2d 877 (E.D. Mich. 2000)

. . . . § 552.101(c) requires that "[e]ach judgment of divorce or judgment of separate maintenance shall determine . . .

TERWILLIGER v. HOME OF HOPE, INC., 21 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (N.D. Okla. 1998)

. . . . § 552.101(a). . . .

N. W. ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CITY OF HOUSTON,, 27 F. Supp. 2d 754 (S.D. Tex. 1998)

. . . Pursuant to § 552.101 of the Texas Government Code, information is not subject to public disclosure under . . . Gov’t Code § 552.101 that information may be exempt from disclosure under the TPIA because it is considered . . .

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. M. PRESSLEY, J. J., 82 F.3d 126 (6th Cir. 1996)

. . . Laws § 552.101, the Divorce Decree provides, in pertinent part, as follows: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND . . . Comp.Laws § 552.101(2); the divorce decree constituted a waiver by Barbara of the insurance benefits; . . . Laws § 552.101(2) and that under ERISA Alvin’s designation of beneficiary controls. . . . Pearson, 848 F.Supp. 1326 (E.D.Mich.1994) (holding that ERISA does not preempt section 552.101). . . . Laws § 552.101. (See J.A. at 52.) . . . .

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. J. BARLOW E., 884 F. Supp. 1118 (E.D. Mich. 1995)

. . . . § 552.101 control. . . . Wheeler relies on Michigan law, M.C.L. § 552.101, which provides that a judgment of divorce “shall determine . . .

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. PEARSON Jr., 848 F. Supp. 1326 (E.D. Mich. 1994)

. . . . § 552.101, which includes the following: (2) Each judgment of divorce or judgment of separate maintenance . . . M.C.L. § 552.101(2). . . .

STATE v. HOAG, 419 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Defendants were charged in Counts 2 and 3 with violation of Sections 552.101 and 552.22, Florida Statutes . . . (1979) which provide: 552.101. . . .

v. C. v., 77 T.C. 1275 (T.C. 1981)

. . . Laws sec. 552.101 (Mich. Stat. Ann. sec. 25.131 (Callaghan 1974)). . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. STATE ROSENBLATT, v. STATE CLAY, v. STATE, 397 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Count 10: unlawful possession of explosive in violation of Sections 552.101, 552.22, Fla.Stat., punishable . . .

ADAMS, v. STATE, 367 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Appellant bases his point on the statute defining the crime, which is Section 552.101, Florida Statutes . . . , argues that the absence of a permit to possess an explosive is an exception carved out by Section 552.101 . . .

STATE v. BOUTWELL,, 367 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . damage to tracks of the Louisville and Nashville Railroad, and also was charged with violating Sections 552.101 . . .

GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. J. KAYE, V. a k a V. v. M. KRZEWICKI,, 584 F.2d 738 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 25.131, Compiled Laws Michigan, 1948, § 552.101. . . .

DE LA COVA, v. STATE, 355 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . , to-wit: DYNAMITE, without having a license or permit thereof . . . ” in contravention of Sections 552.101 . . .

DEARING, Jr. v. STATE, 348 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . conviction entered upon a jury verdict for unlawful possession of explosives without a permit [Sections 552.101 . . .

HENRY, v. STATE, 344 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . explosives, to-wit: DYNAMITE AND PRIMER CORD, without having a license or permit therefor, in violation of 552.101 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DONALL, J., 466 F.2d 1246 (6th Cir. 1972)

. . . . § 552.101, upon which Mary Barbara Houdek relies, provides in pertinent part: “Hereafter every decree . . .

STATE v. ASTORE,, 258 So. 2d 33 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 552.101, F.S.A. . . .

NORRIS, v. STATE, 249 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . the jury having found only that appellant was guilty of unlawful possession contrary to F.S. section 552.101 . . .

STATE v. BABUN, 233 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . The State appeals an order dismissing an information charging the appellees with a violation of § 552.101 . . .

MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. McGUIRE, M., 298 F. Supp. 1261 (E.D. Mich. 1969)

. . . Laws Mich.1948, § 552.101, control and the proceeds of the policy are payable to the estate of the deceased . . .

NORTHEASTERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a v. CISNEROS, v. B. CIORBA, 392 F.2d 198 (6th Cir. 1968)

. . . dismissing her claim on the grounds that Section 25.131, Michigan Statutes Annotated, C.L.Mich.1948, § 552.101 . . .

ANDREWS, v. STATE, 201 So. 2d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . a jury verdict finding him guilty of knowingly having possession of an explosive, in violation of § 552.101 . . .

NORTHEASTERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a v. CISNEROS B., 260 F. Supp. 675 (E.D. Mich. 1966)

. . . . § 25.131, Comp.Laws 1948, § 552.101, the relevant portion of which reads as follows: “Hereafter every . . .

VICTER, v. STATE, 174 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1965)

. . . Fla.Stat, F.S.A., and in a second count with possession of explosives without a license in violation of § 552.101 . . . particular description of said explosive being to the State Attorney unknown, contrary to Florida Statutes 552.101 . . . We now direct our attention to the constitutional validity of F.S. section 552.101, F.S.A. condemning . . .

VICTER, v. STATE, 160 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and in a second count with possession of explosives without a license, condemned by § 552.101 . . .

MURRAY v. UNITED STATES, 107 F. Supp. 290 (E.D. Mich. 1950)

. . . which must be considered— ‘First, Sec. 25.131 of the Michigan Statutes Annotated, Comp.Laws 1948, § 552.101 . . .