Cases from cite.case.law:

CABRERA, v. T. J. PAVEMENT CORP., 2 So. 3d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See §§ 553.60-64, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

A. PIPER, v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES, LTD. R. M., 396 F.3d 227 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . Piper made two payments to PLA, totaling $553.60. . . .

A. PIPER, v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES,, 274 F. Supp. 2d 681 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . Although the plaintiff has paid $553.60 towards the $252.75 delinquent water bill, the plaintiff would . . .

A. PIPER, v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES,, 215 F.R.D. 495 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . Although the plaintiff has paid $553.60 towards the $252.75 delinquent water bill, presently the plaintiff . . .

A. PIPER, v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES,, 262 F. Supp. 2d 520 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . Although the plaintiff has paid $553.60 towards the debt, she must now pay $2,806.92 in order to prevent . . .

FULL CIRCLE SERVICE, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BUREAU OF LICENSE AND BOND d b a, 556 So. 2d 757 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Full Circle, on the other hand, contends that such reduction of $553.60 resulted from disal-lowance of . . .

BOATMEN S FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF KANSAS CITY, M. v. UNITED STATES, 723 F. Supp. 163 (W.D. Mo. 1989)

. . . 125.10 hours (2) Promissory notes 105.65 hours (3) Gift valuation 176.95 hours (4) Stock valuation 553.60 . . .

In JONES, JONES, v. MID- PENN CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY,, 79 B.R. 233 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987)

. . . It appears to have been motivated by the Borrowers’ desire to obtain the $553.60 additional funds which . . . The parties stipulated that the Debtor received $4,105.00 in the first transaction and $553.60 in the . . .

In PACIFIC HOMES, a De La, 20 B.R. 729 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1982)

. . . totaling $4,682.21, of which the sum of $4,128.61 has been paid previously, leaving a balance due of $553.60 . . .

W. L. SCHAUTZ COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 215 Ct. Cl. 179 (Ct. Cl. 1977)

. . . In fiscal 1964, no rent was paid and in fiscal 1965, $553.60 was paid. . . .

W. L. SCHAUTZ COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 567 F.2d 373 (Ct. Cl. 1977)

. . . In fiscal 1964, no rent was paid and in fiscal 1965, $553.60 was paid. . . .

v., 10 Cust. Ct. 596 (Cust. Ct. 1943)

. . . At 20 per centum ad valorem the net purchase price would be $553.60, and the duty, $110.72. . . .

WALTHER v. WILLIAMS MERCANTILE CO. WILLIAMS MERCANTILE CO. v. WALTHER, 169 F. 270 (6th Cir. 1909)

. . . the excess of the last over the first in-, ventory, the Mercantile Company paid to Walker & Williams $553.60 . . .