Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 560.309 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 560.309 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 560.309

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 560
MONEY SERVICES BUSINESSES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 560.309
560.309 Conduct of business.
(1) A licensee may transact business under this part only under the legal name under which the person is licensed. The use of a fictitious name is allowed if the fictitious name has been registered with the Department of State and disclosed to the office as part of an initial license application, or subsequent amendment to the application, prior to its use.
(2) At the time a licensee accepts a payment instrument that is cashed by the licensee, the payment instrument must be endorsed using the legal name under which the licensee is licensed.
(3) A licensee under this part must maintain and deposit payment instruments into its own commercial account at a federally insured financial institution. If a licensee ceases to maintain such a depository account, the licensee must not engage in check cashing until the licensee reestablishes such an account and notifies the office of the account as required by s. 560.126(4).
(4) A licensee may not accept or cash a payment instrument from a person who is not the original payee; however, this subsection does not prohibit a licensee from accepting or cashing a corporate payment instrument from a conductor who is an authorized officer of the corporate payee named on the instrument’s face.
(5) A licensee must report all suspicious activity to the office in accordance with the criteria in 31 C.F.R. s. 1022.320. In lieu of filing such reports, the commission may prescribe by rule that the licensee may file such reports with an appropriate regulator.
(6) Each location of a licensee where checks are cashed must be equipped with a security camera system that is capable of recording and retrieving an image in order to assist in identifying and apprehending an offender. The licensee does not have to install a security camera system if the licensee has installed a bulletproof or bullet-resistant partition or enclosure in the area where checks are cashed.
(7) The commission may by rule require a check casher to display its license and post a notice listing its charges for cashing payment instruments.
(8) Exclusive of the direct costs of verification, which shall be established by rule not to exceed $5, a check casher may not:
(a) Charge fees, except as otherwise provided by this part, in excess of 5 percent of the face amount of the payment instrument, or $5, whichever is greater;
(b) Charge fees in excess of 3 percent of the face amount of the payment instrument, or $5, whichever is greater, if such payment instrument is the payment of any kind of state public assistance or federal social security benefit payable to the bearer of the payment instrument; or
(c) Charge fees for personal checks or money orders in excess of 10 percent of the face amount of those payment instruments, or $5, whichever is greater.
(9) A licensee cashing payment instruments may not assess the cost of collections, other than fees for insufficient funds as provided by law, without a judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction.
(10) If a check is returned to a licensee from a payor financial institution due to lack of funds, a closed account, or a stop-payment order, the licensee may seek collection pursuant to s. 68.065. In seeking collection, the licensee must comply with the prohibitions against harassment or abuse, false or misleading representations, and unfair practices in the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. ss. 1692d, 1692e, and 1692f. A violation of this subsection is a deceptive and unfair trade practice and constitutes a violation of the Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act under part II of chapter 501. In addition, a licensee must comply with the applicable provisions of the Consumer Collection Practices Act under part VI of chapter 559, including s. 559.77.
(11) A licensee may not cash corporate checks where the aggregate face amount of all corporate checks cashed for each payee exceeds 200 percent of the payee’s workers’ compensation policy payroll amount during the same dates as the workers’ compensation policy coverage period.
History.s. 3, ch. 94-238; s. 3, ch. 94-354; s. 723, ch. 2003-261; s. 41, ch. 2008-177; s. 6, ch. 2012-85; s. 7, ch. 2014-81; s. 6, ch. 2023-130.

F.S. 560.309 on Google Scholar

F.S. 560.309 on Casetext

Amendments to 560.309


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 560.309
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 560.309.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

McKENZIE CHECK ADVANCE OF FLORIDA, LLC. v. BETTS,, 928 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 2006)

. . . provided, "A check casher may accept a postdated check, subject to the fees established in Section 560.309 . . . provided that “[a] check casher may accept a postdated check, subject to the fees established in Section 560.309 . . .

BETTS, v. McKENZIE CHECK ADVANCE OF FLORIDA, LLC, d b a A. G., 879 So. 2d 667 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See §§ 560.303, 560.309, 560.310, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). . . . provisions of Chapter 560, Florida Statutes, and specifically within the fee caps contained within section 560.309 . . .

BETTS v. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., 863 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . asserting that certain transactions involving Ace violated Florida’s usury laws as well as section 560.309 . . .

FASTFUNDING THE COMPANY, INC. v. BETTS,, 852 So. 2d 353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . deferred presentment transactions were legally permitted as a check cashing activity authorized by section 560.309 . . .

BETTS, v. ADVANCE AMERICA,, 213 F.R.D. 466 (M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 560.309(4) provides that: Exclusive of the direct costs of verification which shall be established . . . Stat. § 560.309(4). . . . states that “[a] cheek casher may accept a postdated check, subject to the fees established in Section 560.309 . . .

ANY KIND CHECKS CASHED, INC. a v. G. TALCOTT, Jr. GUARINO,, 830 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 560.309(4)(b) contemplates that such checks will be presented at check cashing outlets; it limits . . . contemplate that a check cashing business will engage in various types of “verification” of a check. § 560.309 . . .

BETTS v. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., 827 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . themselves and the Defendants were legally permitted as check cashing activity authorized by section 560.309 . . . Section 560.309(4)(a)-(c), Florida Statutes (2000) provides: (4) Exclusive of the direct costs of verification . . . Banking and Finance (Department) promulgated a rule capping the verification fee mentioned in section 560.309 . . . 3C-560.801(i), Florida Administrative Code, provides: In addition to the fees established in Section 560.309 . . . provisions of Chapter 560, Florida Statutes, and specifically within the fee caps contained within Section 560.309 . . .