Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 564.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 564.09 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 564.09

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Chapter 564
WINE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 564.09
564.09 Restaurants; off-premises consumption of wine.Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a restaurant licensed to sell wine on the premises may permit a patron to remove one unsealed bottle of wine for consumption off the premises if the patron has purchased a meal and consumed a portion of the bottle of wine on the restaurant premises. A partially consumed bottle of wine that is to be removed from the premises must be securely resealed by the licensee or its employees before removal from the premises. The partially consumed bottle of wine shall be placed in a bag or other container that is secured in such a manner that it is visibly apparent if the container has been subsequently opened or tampered with, and a dated receipt for the bottle of wine and meal shall be provided by the licensee and attached to the container. If transported in a motor vehicle, the container with the resealed bottle of wine must be placed in a locked glove compartment, a locked trunk, or the area behind the last upright seat of a motor vehicle that is not equipped with a trunk.
History.s. 1, ch. 2005-250; s. 2, ch. 2021-30.

F.S. 564.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 564.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 564.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 564.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 564.09.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In PARKER, v., 328 B.R. 548 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2005)

. . . The net monthly expenses included a student loan payment of $564.09 and transportation costs of $195.00 . . . The court found that if the student loan payment of $564.09 were eliminated from her budget, she would . . .

In PARKER, v., 322 B.R. 856 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 2005)

. . . entertainment, periodicals 5.00 Automobile Insurance 113.00 Personal property taxes 12.00 Student loan payment 564.09 . . . Obviously, these figures demonstrate that the Debtor is unable to make the regular student loan payment of $564.09 . . . It is true that if the regular student loan payment of $564.09 is eliminated from the Debtor’s budget . . . payment that would be due each month under the original terms of the loan agreement, but she budgeted $564.09 . . .