Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 570.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 570.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SPEED, v. JMA ENERGY COMPANY, LLC,, 872 F.3d 1122 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . Stat. tit. 52, § 570.10(D) (2010). . . .

IN RE SEMCRUDE L. P. v. J. LLC d b a CMX Co, DC D. E. DK LLC GMX Ex, LLC Co L LLC H. I. J D LLC F. Co. LLC Co KLM Co L J LD LLC LLC RJ Co LLC LLC Co LP Ok TGT D LLC Co. LLC LLC V. J. I. W. D. LLC In L. P. BP v. L. P. LSC In L. P. J. v. L. P. IC- Co, In L. P. IC- CO, WEOC, v. J. IC- CO,, 864 F.3d 280 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . PRSA § 570.10(a) states: All proceeds from the sale of production shall be regarded as separate and distinct . . . Stat. tit. 52, § 570.10(a). . . . As the concluding sentence of PRSA § 570.10(a) states, “Nothing in this subsection shall create an express . . . The Lien Act includes buyer defenses for the liens it creates, which also apply to PRSA § 570.10(a): . . . However, our take is that to the extent an implied trust could be imposed under PRSA § 570.10(a), all . . .

. . . PRSA § 570.10(a) states: All proceeds from the sale of production shall be regarded as separate and distinct . . . Stat. tit. 52, § 570.10(a). . . . As the concluding sentence of PRSA § 570.10(a) states, “Nothing in this subsection shall create an express . . . implied trust, The Lien Act includes buyer defenses for the liens it creates, which also apply to PRSA § 570.10 . . .

R. WHISENANT, v. SHERIDAN PRODUCTION COMPANY, LLC,, 627 F. App'x 706 (10th Cir. 2015)

. . . Ann. tit. 52, § 570.10(D)(1). . . .

ANDERSON LIVING TRUST f k a H. W. L. v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, LLC, f k a H. W. v. WPX LLC f k a WPX LLC LLC WPX LLC, f k a RMT LLC,, 952 F. Supp. 2d 979 (D.N.M. 2013)

. . . . § 570.10(D)(1), an oil- and-gas producer may interest based on the “underpayment amount ... claimed . . . St. § 570.10(D)(l)(“Except as otherwise provided in ... this section,, where proceeds from the sale of . . .

HITCH ENTERPRISES, INC. D. v. CIMAREX ENERGY CO., 859 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (W.D. Okla. 2012)

. . . . § 570.10(A), and that the defendants have breached this duty “by failing to properly report, account . . . This claim is grounded on the plaintiffs’ allegation that pursuant to “[section] 570.10(A), the proceeds . . . The Court further finds that the plaintiffs’ reliance on section 570.10(A) is misplaced. . . . extent the Court hereby DISMISSES Counts I, IV, V, VI, VII (breach of fiduciary duty under section 570.10 . . . Section 570.10(A) provides in pertinent part that [a]ll proceeds from the sale of production shall be . . .

In SEMCRUDE, L. P. v. L. P., 407 B.R. 553 (D. Del. 2009)

. . . . § 570.10, but the Bankruptcy Court refused to hear Plaintiffs’ request for in-junctive relief. . . .

In SEMCRUDE, L. P. v. L. P., 407 B.R. 140 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009)

. . . While the Court is ruling herein on a discrete question of law — whether § 570.10(A) of the PRSA creates . . . The Parties’ Positions This dispute concerns the legal effect and scope of § 570.10(A) of the PRSA. . . . Ann. § 570.10(A) (emphasis added). . . . Application of Oklahoma Trust Law to § 570.10(A) Section 570.10(A) contains three sentences. . . . Thus, a review of the PRSA as a whole is central to a proper analysis of § 570.10(A). . . .

In LARISON,, 357 B.R. 624 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2006)

. . . the amount of $22,420.87, representing the amount set forth in the Court’s decision plus costs of $570.10 . . .

A. HENRIKSON, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, a TMS d b a, 120 F. App'x 949 (4th Cir. 2005)

. . . Plaintiff was to make monthly payments of $570.10 by the tenth day of that month beginning in October . . . agreement, which required double payments by the end of each month, the original note required the $570.10 . . .

OKLAND OIL COMPANY, v. CONOCO INC. a, 144 F.3d 1308 (10th Cir. 1998)

. . . Stat. tit. 23, §§ 5-7, 61, tit. 52, § 570.10; Sisney v. . . . Stat. tit. 52, § 570.10(D)(1) (1998 Supp.), provides that: Except as otherwise provided in paragraph . . . Stat. tit. 52, § 570.14(B) makes it clear that § 570.10 “shall neither preclude nor impair the right . . . Furthermore, a comparison of § 570.10 and Oklahoma’s punitive damage statute, Okla. . . . Prejudgment interest under § 570.10, on the other hand, may be awarded to a plaintiff even without a . . .

In TULSA ENERGY, INC. TULSA ENERGY, INC. v. KPL PRODUCTION COMPANY, NGL, In TULSA ENERGY, INC. TULSA ENERGY, INC. v. KPL PRODUCTION COMPANY, NGL,, 110 F.3d 88 (10th Cir. 1997)

. . . Okla.Stat. tit. 52, § 570.10 (1992) (formerly found at Okla. . . . Both the bankruptcy court and the district court found that the interest payment provisions of § 570.10 . . . Section 570.10(D)(2)(a) provides for six percent interest on unpaid proceeds, in the event that funds . . . Section 570.10(D)(1) provides for twelve percent interest, in the event that payments are withheld for . . . The six percent rate in § 570.10 is thus exactly the same as the “standard,” nonpunitive rate of interest . . .

In TULSA ENERGY, INC. TULSA ENERGY, INC. v. KPL PRODUCTION COMPANY, NGL, In TULSA ENERGY, INC. TULSA ENERGY, INC. v. KPL PRODUCTION COMPANY, NGL,, 111 F.3d 88 (10th Cir. 1997)

ROBERTS RANCH COMPANY, v. EXXON CORPORATION,, 43 F. Supp. 2d 1252 (W.D. Okla. 1997)

. . . . § 570.10 (formerly Section 540). . . . Title 52 Okla.Stat. § 570.10 D does not contain similar language. . . . Exxon correctly points out that the language “to be compounded annually” in Section 570.10 D, formerly . . . Thus, any prejudgment interest to which the Plaintiffs may be entitled under Section 570.10 D or its . . . Section 570.10 D reads as follows: 1. . . .

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPELINE COMPANY ANR KN a CNG a U. S. A. El v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE H. M. D. S. III, Jr., 83 F.3d 1219 (10th Cir. 1996)

. . . Stat. tit. 52, § 570.10, is not at issue in this appeal except insofar as it was amended by SB 160. . . .

In TULSA ENERGY, INC. TULSA ENERGY, INC. v. OKLAHOMA OIL GAS MANAGEMENT, INC. KPL NGL,, 181 B.R. 544 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1995)

. . . with the then current title examination standards of the Oklahoma Bar Association. 52 O.S.Supp.1993, § 570.10 . . .

F. QUINLAN, v. KOCH OIL COMPANY, A DIVISION OF KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC. GPM, 25 F.3d 936 (10th Cir. 1994)

. . . In 1992, Okla.Stat. tit. 52, § 540 was re-numbered and codified at Okla.Stat. tit. 52, § 570.10. . . . Because this action predated the recodification, we will cite to § 540 rather than § 570.10. . . . .

COOSEWOON v. MERIDIAN OIL COMPANY, a, 25 F.3d 920 (10th Cir. 1994)

. . . In these counts, Plaintiffs alleged Meridian’s violation of Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 52, §§ 570.10 (formerly . . . Section 570.10 provides for the recovery of twelve percent interest compounded annually, on the late . . . justifying the application of Oklahoma law, Plaintiffs’ state law cause of action for interest under § 570.10 . . .

In MICHIGAN LITHOGRAPHING COMPANY, OWEN- AMES- KIMBALL COMPANY, v. MICHIGAN LITHOGRAPHING COMPANY, U. S. v. N. RODGERS,, 140 B.R. 161 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1992)

. . . . § 570.10 stated: Proceedings to enforce such lien shall be by bill and chancery, under oath, and notice . . . Washtenaw Lumber comes closest to supporting the Trustee’s interpretation of Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 570.10 . . .

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF SAVINGS INSTITUTIONS, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 664 F. Supp. 572 (D.D.C. 1987)

. . . . §§ 545.74, 563.37(a), 570.10 (1986). . . .

SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD,, 588 F. Supp. 749 (D.D.C. 1984)

. . . . § 570.10. . . . .

CARPENTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DETROIT, WAYNE, OAKLAND AND MACOMB COUNTIES AND VICINITY, AFL- CIO, a a v. E. MORSE, d b a a a, 455 F. Supp. 535 (E.D. Mich. 1978)

. . . . § 570.10. . . .

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law: