Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES v. MENDEZ, 126 So. 3d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . The Department first adopted a rule, followed by the enactment of section 581.184, Florida Statutes ( . . . Section 581.184, Florida Statutes, provided methods of implementing the plan, and section 581.1845, Florida . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. LOPEZ- BRIGNONI,, 114 So. 3d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Patchen, 906 So.2d at 1006; see also § 581.184(2)(a), Fla. . . . .”); § 581.184(l)(b), Fla. . . .

D. VAUGHAN, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, a A., 920 So. 2d 650 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 581.184, Florida Statutes, further requires the sheriff to provide assistance and protection . . . See 581.184(7), Fla. Stat. (2000), subsequently amended and now found in subsection (9). . . .

P. PATCHEN, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES,, 906 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 2005)

. . . In 2002, section 581.184(l)(b), Florida Statutes, was amended to state in pertinent part: “Exposed to . . . Section 581.184(2)(a) was amended to state in pertinent part: The department shall remove and destroy . . . all infected citrus trees and all citrus trees exposed to infection. § 581.184, Fla. . . . eradicating, controlling, or preventing the dissemination of citrus canker disease in this state,” see § 581.184 . . . I cannot agree with the majority that this case is controlled by section 581.184, Florida Statutes (2002 . . . The decision in Haire addresses the constitutionality of section 581.184, Florida Statutes (2003) (Citrus . . .

M. HAIRE, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v., 870 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 2004)

. . . To resolve this issue, we must address the constitutionality of section 581.184, Florida Statutes (2003 . . . (codified at § 581.184(2), Fla. Stat. (2003)). . . . .” § 581.184(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . .” § 581.184(l)(b). . . . See § 581.184(2)(a). . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. M. A. HAIRE, B. M., 865 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . trial court found that the department’s existing methodology did not assure compliance with section 581.184 . . . Section 581.184 defines a citrus tree exposed to infection as one located within 1,900 feet of an infected . . . Before the legislature’s enactment of section 581.184, in 2002, the 1900 foot buffer zone was a “rule . . . Accepting section 581.184 in light of Haire, the trial judge, considering Appellees’ renewed request . . . See § 581.184(2) & (4), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

A. MESZAROS G. v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES,, 861 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 581.184, Florida Statutes (2002) mandates that the “Department shall remove and destroy all infected . . . The Meszaroses argue that the 1900 foot boundary established in section 581.184 is based upon scientific . . .

I. SPEARS, v. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES,, 858 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Spears challenges the constitutionality of section 581.184, Florida Statutes, governing citrus canker . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. M. A. HAIRE, B. M., 836 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The issues presented are: (1) whether section 581.184, Florida Statutes (2002), requiring the removal . . . We hold that section 581.184 does not violate due process and is therefore constitutional, but that section . . . In its order the court found that section 581.184 was unconstitutional because it constituted a taking . . . See § 581.184. Thus, the probable cause for an administrative search is satisfied. . . . In summary, we conclude and hold that section 581.184 is constitutional. . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES v. M. HAIRE, 824 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 2002)

. . . Section 581.184, Florida Statutes enacted by the Legislature in 2002, is a complex statutory scheme. . . . If we eventually are called upon to adjudicate the constitutionality of section 581.184 or any related . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. M. HAIRE A., 832 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . In the process the court held unconstitutional various aspects of the 2002 amendments to sections 581.184 . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES L. v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, a a, 790 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 581.184(7), Fla. . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CONSUMER SERVICES v. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, a a a R. N. a a a a a, 792 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . manner inconsistent with the legislature’s definition of “exposed to infection” as set forth in section 581.184 . . .

STATE v. SUN GARDENS CITRUS, LLP II, a a O. Jr., 780 So. 2d 922 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The Departmént fashioned this rule pursuant to the grant of legislative authority found in section 581.184 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. O. POLK,, 568 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1990)

. . . special session in December 1984, also responded to the threat of citrus canker by enacting section 581.184 . . .