Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, v. MORRIS,, 944 So. 2d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Confusion has prevailed in this case because the plaintiffs have proceeded upon the theory that Section 588.11 . . . We hold that is an improper construction of Section 588.11 and is a misunderstanding of the Warren Act . . . All Section 588.11 does (or rather did at the time it was passed) is to impose a conditional legal duty . . .

FLORIDA BOARD OF EDUCATION, v. ANDREWS,, 903 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . 487 So.2d 39, 40 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (stating that the fencing requirements in sections 588.01 through 588.11 . . .

GOTTLIEB, v. Q. T. WILES,, 150 F.R.D. 174 (D. Colo. 1993)

. . . The 50% reductions in photocopying and travel were warranted; $588.11 in computer research expenses are . . .

ZUPPARDO, v. O HARE,, 487 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . horse to stray upon Highway 41, appellee had “violated the requirements of Florida Statute 588.01, 588.11 . . . Howard, 438 So.2d 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) that sections 588.-01 through 588.11, pertaining to “legal . . . Sections 588.01 through 588.11 were enacted to protect landowners against trespassers, whereas the Warren . . .

DAVIDSON W. D. a W. D. a W. E. R. C. D. G. D. T. J. E. P. v. HOWARD, DAVIDSON W. D. a W. D. a W. E. R. C. D. G. D. T. J. E. P. v. COLLIER COMPANY,, 438 So. 2d 899 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Confusion has prevailed in this case because the plaintiffs have proceeded upon the theory that Section 588.11 . . . We hold that is an improper construction of Section 588.11 and a misunderstanding of the Warren Act. . . . Section 588.11, Florida Statutes, does two things. . . . We hold that Section 588.11, Florida Statutes, imposes no absolute legal duty upon an owner of land to . . . All Section 588.11 does (or rather did at the time it was passed) is to impose a conditional legal duty . . .

BEAVER, v. HOWERTON,, 223 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 588.11, F.S.A. or had violated “the common law”. . . .

WELCH v. F. BAKER,, 184 So. 2d 188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . in reasonably good condition a fence for the enclosure of his said cattle, in violation of Sections 588.11 . . . above said public road in Madison County, Florida, contrary to the provisions of Sections 588.15 and 588.11 . . . The second statute which the plaintiffs cite and rely upon in their complaint (Section 588.11) provides . . .

VOLENTINE AND LITTLETON, CONTRACTORS, A PARTNERSHIP, COMPOSED OF M. O. VOLENTINE AND EARL LITTLETON v. THE UNITED STATES, 144 Ct. Cl. 723 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . 474.23 Contributions to Texas Employment Commission at 2.7%_ 1,065.47 Utilities_ 352.50 Miscellaneous- 588.11 . . .