Cases from cite.case.law:

CARNAHAN, v. W. NORVELL,, 270 So. 3d 414 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 588.15, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

MANFRE, v. SHINKLE,, 184 So. 3d 641 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . In order to fulfill that purpose, the Act included provisions in section 588.15 that made the livestock . . . Moreover, as evident by the provisions of sections 588.14 and 588.15, Florida Statutes (2008), the Legislature . . . Baker, 184 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966) (“Section 588.15 ... must be read in pari mate-ria with . . . provision, Section 588.14, which lays down the owner’s duty, the negligent breach of which, under Section 588.15 . . .

FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, v. MORRIS,, 944 So. 2d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 588.15, Fla. Stat. . . . Section 588.15 now provides ''[ejvery owner of livestock who intentionally, willfully, carelessly, or . . .

FLORIDA BOARD OF EDUCATION, v. ANDREWS,, 903 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . 588.01, Florida Statutes, could be considered as evidence of the defendant’s negligence under section 588.15 . . .

BOSWELL, v. RUSSELL,, 819 So. 2d 925 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . 735 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), but rather, liability arises only upon a showing of negligence: 588.15 . . . be liable in damages for all injury and property damage sustained by any person by reason thereof. § 588.15 . . .

DARIO v. D. ROTH,, 756 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 588.15 (1991). . . .

A. HANSON, v. H. SCHARBER, 749 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . bull which the Scharbers had negligently allowed to stray onto the roadway in violation of section 588.15 . . . — No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state. 588.15 . . .

TOOLE, v. J. DUPUIS,, 735 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . without supporting affidavits or other proof, but relying solely on the argument that sections 588.14 and 588.15 . . . Florida law is clear that sections 588.14 and 588.15 do not impose strict liability on the owner of livestock . . . Section 588.15, Florida Statutes (1997) provides: Liability of owner. — Every owner of livestock who . . .

FISEL, v. C. WYNNS R., 667 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 1996)

. . . least negligence is required to establish liability against a livestock owner under sections 588.14 and 588.15 . . . livestock owners strictly liable, the legislature opted instead for a showing of at least negligence: 588.15 . . . appealed to this Court, arguing that his equal protection rights had been violated because section 588.15 . . . The legislature has left section 588.15 intact following Selby and we are just as bound today as we were . . . to address: Presumably, the Legislature had all the alternatives before it when it enacted Section 588.15 . . .

FISEL, v. C. WYNNS R., 650 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . If the majority members of this court are interested in revising section 588.15, Florida Statutes, then . . . Section 588.15, Florida Statutes, provides that an owner who negligently permits their livestock to run . . . I find that the negligence required in section 588.15 may be established by finding that the Wynnses . . . — No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state. 588.15 . . .

S. STOCKE, v. O. MARSH, Jr., 912 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 588.15(a). . . .

ZUPPARDO, v. O HARE,, 487 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . appellant’s case was based on general allegations of negligence and violations of sections 588.14 and 588.15 . . .

JAMES, Jr. v. M. SKINNER, II,, 464 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 588.15, Fla.Stat. (1983); Visingardi v. Tirone, 193 So.2d 601 (Fla.1966). . . .

DAVIDSON W. D. a W. D. a W. E. R. C. D. G. D. T. J. E. P. v. HOWARD, DAVIDSON W. D. a W. D. a W. E. R. C. D. G. D. T. J. E. P. v. COLLIER COMPANY,, 438 So. 2d 899 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 588.15, Fla.Stat. . . .

SELBY M. v. BULLOCK, Jr., 287 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1973)

. . . entered after a pre-trial hearing and upon appellants’ “Motion As To Constitutionality of Florida Statute 588.15 . . . ”, passed upon the validity of Section 588.15, Florida Statutes, 1971, giving this Court jurisdiction . . . Florida Statute 588.15 provides as follows: “. . . . . . . The crux of this appeal is the constitutionality of Section 588.15, Florida Statutes F.S.A. . . . Presumably, the Legislature had all the alternatives before it when it enacted Section 588.15. . . . Section 588.15, F. . . . Section 588.15, F.S.A.) considered in the light of its history and purpose, should not be “watered” down . . .

BEAVER, v. HOWERTON,, 223 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . §§ 588.14 and 588.15, F.S.A. which are a compilation of §§ 3 and 4 of Ch. 25236, General Laws of 1949 . . . No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state.” “588.15 . . . Upon appeal the 3rd District Court, after quoting F.S. §§ 588.14 and 588.15, F.S.A., supra, and adverting . . . Baker was sued for violating F.S. § 588.15, F.S.A., and upon trial the Circuit Court directed verdict . . .

R. HUGHES, v. LANDERS,, 215 So. 2d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . appellee was negligent by not keeping the fence in proper condition under Florida Statutes §§ 588.14, 588.15 . . .

WELCH v. F. BAKER,, 184 So. 2d 188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . The first statutory provision (Section 588.15) thus cited and invoked in the complaint reads as follows . . . Section 588.15, quoted above, must be read in pari materia with the preceding provision, Section 588.14 . . . , which lays down the owner’s duty, the negligent breach of which, under Section 588.15, makes the owner . . . Sections 588.14 and 588.15 are, respectively, Sections 3 and 4 of Chapter 25236, Laws of Florida, Acts . . . We are aided in our construction of Section 588.15 by two decisions of our sister district courts of . . .

C. GORDON, v. A. SUTHERLAND, A. R. d b a T-, 131 So. 2d 520 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . Appellant urges that sections 588.14 and 588.15, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., were violated and evidence of this . . . No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state.” “588.15 . . .

LEE v. FLORITOR,, 18 Fla. Supp. 38 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1961)

. . . See specifically §§588.14 and 588.15, Florida Statutes; Bryant v. City of Tampa, Fla. . . .

BARBER v. TECHE GREYHOUND LINES, 115 F. Supp. 209 (N.D. Fla. 1953)

. . . Section 588.15 reads as follows: “Every owner of livestock who intentionally, wilfully, carelessly or . . . Section 588.15 does not, of course, exempt defendant from liability for its own negligence, even though . . .

SOUTHERN PAC. CO. v. HAIGHT, 126 F.2d 900 (9th Cir. 1942)

. . . hospital and medical services; and that the total of these expenses at the time of the trial was only $4,'588.15 . . . The evidence shows that while the ap-pellee had actually incurred only this $4,-588.15 at the time of . . .