Cases from cite.case.law:

DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT v. OSBORNE, 557 U.S. 52 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §590.01 (2008); Mo. Rev. Stat. §547.035 (2008 Cum. Supp.); Mont. . . .

HAMILTON, v. ROEHRICH,, 628 F. Supp. 2d 1033 (D. Minn. 2009)

. . . See, Minnesota Statutes Section 590.01, Subdivision 3 (“The court may summarily deny a second or successive . . .

E. MURRAY, v. HVASS,, 269 F.3d 896 (8th Cir. 2001)

. . . effectively raised on direct appeal and is properly raised in a post-conviction proceeding under Minn.Stat. 590.01 . . .

CHANCELLOR MEDIA WHITECO OUTDOOR, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 795 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . only to be later acquired by the State would unduly burden the taxpayers with an unwarranted cost. . 590.01 . . .

D. IRWIN, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA,, 829 F.2d 690 (8th Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 590.01-06. . . .

CHAMBERLAIN, v. ERICKSEN,, 744 F.2d 628 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 590.01(1) (West Supp.1984); see also State v. Myers, 273 N.W.2d 656 (Minn. 1978); State v. . . .

KELSEY, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA,, 622 F.2d 956 (8th Cir. 1980)

. . . The post-conviction relief statute, Minn.Stat. 590.01 et seq., with respect to which the State Public . . .

T. THOMPSON, v. McMANUS,, 377 F. Supp. 589 (D. Minn. 1974)

. . . Thereafter, proceedings for post-conviction relief were commenced in state court pursuant to Minn.Stat. 590.01 . . .

TAYLOR, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA,, 450 F.2d 1110 (8th Cir. 1971)

. . . . §§ 590.01, 590.05 (1969). We find, under the circumstances existing, this to be error. . . .

T. THOMPSON, v. TAHASH,, 286 F. Supp. 663 (D. Minn. 1968)

. . . . § 590.01 et seq. . . .

HENRY SPEN AND COMPANY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 139 Ct. Cl. 613 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . Jenny, Model #52222-39 incl. 52241-46 inch as per invoice #JV 69714, dated June 30, 1949, priced at $590.01 . . .