Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 593.21 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 593.21 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 593.21

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 593
AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY INSECT CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 593.21
593.21 Monitoring of health complaints by Department of Health; hotline; rulemaking authority.At any time when the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services is conducting an emergency response to a plant pest infestation which involves the aerial application of a pesticide to an urbanized area, the Department of Health shall monitor health problems that result from chemical exposure about which complaints are made to physicians and health care facilities. The Department of Health shall provide a toll-free hotline on which persons may register complaints and shall make a record of all calls received on that line. In consultation with the Department of Health, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services shall adopt by rule standards for determining when the use of a particular pesticide should be discontinued.
History.s. 2, ch. 98-108.

F.S. 593.21 on Google Scholar

F.S. 593.21 on Casetext

Amendments to 593.21


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 593.21
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 593.21.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

R. SMITH, v. E. SORENSEN, R. GETTEMY v. E. SORENSEN, L. BAUDLER, v. E. SORENSEN,, 748 F.2d 427 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Smith was awarded attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses of $29,-593.21. . . .

R. C. v., 64 T.C. 560 (T.C. 1975)

. . . Anderson spent $593.21 for additional improvements on the property, and rented it to others until it . . . reacquired it in 1967; after examining the evidence submitted by them, we have found that they spent $593.21 . . . their adjusted basis in the property at the time of its sale in 1969 was $10,496.80 ($11,053.59 + $593.21 . . .