Cases from cite.case.law:

ROMAY, v. CARIBEVISION HOLDINGS, INC., 147 So. 3d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 607.1505(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

In U. S. EAGLE CORPORATION, U. S. v. K. K. v. J. Jr., 484 B.R. 640 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2012)

. . . . § 607.1505(3) (providing that Florida is not authorized “to regulate the organization or internal affairs . . . Stat. § 607.1505(3)). . . .

Dr. ARNOLD, v. A. McFALL,, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 607.1505(3) (stating in pertinent part that “[t]his act does not authorize this state to regulate . . . Stat. § 607.1505(3). . . .

BANCO INDUSTRIAL DE VENEZUELA C. A. MIAMI AGENCY, v. DE SAAD,, 68 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2011)

. . . Specifically, section 607.1505(1), Florida Statutes, provides that “[a] certificate of authority authorizes . . . Further, section 607.1505(2), Florida Statutes, provides that a foreign corporation conducting business . . . Section 607.1505(3), Florida Statutes, then sets out the following important exception: “This act does . . . Accordingly, pursuant to section 607.1505(3), Banco is not subject to Florida’s indemnification provision . . .

E. MUKAMAL, v. BAKES, C. LLC,, 378 F. App'x 890 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 607.1505(3); Chatlos Found., Inc. v. . . . Stat. § 607.1505(3)). . . . Stat. § 607.1505(3). . . . Stat. § 607.1505(3); Chatlos, 882 So.2d at 1023. . . .

E. MUKAMAL, v. BAKES, C. LLC,, 378 F. App'x 890 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 607.1505(3); Chatlos Found., Inc. v. . . . Stat. § 607.1505(3)). . . . Stat. § 607.1505(3). . . . Stat. § 607.1505(3); Chatlos, 882 So.2d at 1023. . . .

E. MUKAMAL, v. BAKES, C. LLC, LLC, M. S. C. B. LLP., 383 B.R. 798 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 607.1505(3), which provides: "This act does not authorize this state to regulate the organization . . .

CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC. v. D ARATA,, 882 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . 607.0850 applied to a foreign corporation qualified to do business in Florida by virtue of section 607.1505 . . . Thus pursuant to section 607.1505(2), the corporation assumed the same liabilities imposed upon a domestic . . .

DE SAAD, f u b o P. A. v. BANCO INDUSTRIAL DE VENEZUELA, C. A., 843 So. 2d 953 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . is operating under a certificate of authority to transact business in Florida, pursuant to Section 607.1505 . . . BIV Miami given the fact that it is qualified to do business in Florida and thus, pursuant to Section 607.1505 . . . Section 607.1505(2), in pertinent part, states that a: [Fjoreign corporation with a valid certificate . . . The trial court’s ruling is in derogation of the plain language of Section 607.1505(2) which must be . . . The bank’s argument simply ignores the language of § 607.1505(2) quoted above. . . .

LEGAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 702 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Linotype Co., 591 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (concluding that under section 607.1505, a foreign corporation . . . The latter provision, now codified as section 607.1505, came verbatim from section 15.05 of the Model . . .

In SUNRISE ISLAND, LTD. SUNRISE ISLAND, LTD. v. GOLDMAN SACHS COMPANY, M. BALLARD, IRA No. In LIMITED GAMING OF AMERICA INC. LIMITED GAMING OF AMERICA INC. v. GOLDMAN SACHS COMPANY, M. BALLARD, IRA No., 203 B.R. 171 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1996)

. . . . § 607.1505. . . .

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, v. LINOTYPE COMPANY,, 591 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . fact that the defendant as a foreign corporation was qualified to do business in Florida under Section 607.1505 . . .