The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 625
ACCOUNTING, INVESTMENTS, AND DEPOSITS BY INSURERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 625.50

625.50 Authorized deposits of insurers and agents.—The following deposits of insurers and agents when made through the department shall be accepted and held and shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter:

(1) Deposits required under this code for authority to transact insurance in this state.

(2) Deposits of domestic insurers when made pursuant to the laws of other states, provinces, and countries as requirement for authority to transact insurance in such state, province, or country.

(3) Deposits in such additional amounts as are permitted to be made under s. 625.58.

History.—s. 166, ch. 59-205; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 123, 134, 809(1st), ch. 82-243; s. 9, ch. 90-119; ss. 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 625.50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 625.50 on Casetext

Amendments to 625.50

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 625.50

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 625.50.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BANK OF AMERICA, v. E. JARCZYK,, 268 B.R. 17 (W.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . he charged an additional $694.62 in purchases that month, and took cash advances in the amount of $625.50 . . .

JA DAN, INC. a f u b o Ja- v. L- J, INC. v. B W CONSTRUCTION,, 898 F. Supp. 894 (S.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . an overcharge of $24,723.50 on Ja Dan’s truck charge and indicates that the correct charge is $31,-625.50 . . .

McBRIDE, v. H. McBRIDE,, 637 So. 2d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . thousand two hundred fifty-one and 00/100 Dollars ($1,251.00) per month, payable in the amount of $625.50 . . . on the 4th of each month and $625.50 on the 19th of each month, which will cover the following expenses . . .

In XEBEC, a L. PFEIFFER, v. G. COUCH,, 147 B.R. 518 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1992)

. . . The court disallowed word processing fees in the amount of $625.50 and expenses of $1,544.00 for a private . . . The court reduced Xebec’s expenses by $625.50 for word processing costs and $1,544 for a private investigator . . .

CONCOURSE BEAUTY SCHOOL, INC. v. P. POLAKOV, 685 F. Supp. 1311 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . arbitrators in the instant case were presented with a counterclaim requesting $135,000 and they awarded $106,-625.50 . . .

RAYMER, v. UNITED STATES GILL, R. v. UNITED STATES, 482 F. Supp. 432 (W.D. Ky. 1979)

. . . expectancy was 46.95 years. (10) Ronald Raymer’s gross income in 1970 was $13,970.10 and in 1971 was $15,-625.50 . . .

E. GOODENOW, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 238 F.2d 20 (8th Cir. 1956)

. . . This is a petition to review a decision of the Tax Court redetermining a deficiency of $625.50 in the . . .

E. v., 25 T.C. 1 (T.C. 1955)

. . . Rice, Judge: This proceeding involves a deficiency in income tax in the amount of $625.50 for the year . . .

Co. v. T., 123 Fla. 84 (Fla. 1936)

. . . were entitled to a verdict, they should recover twice the amount paid for the fertilizer, to-wit: $625.50 . . . This was not error because the declaration claimed $625.50 (of which amount $62.50 was a cash discount . . . Plaintiffs were warranted in recovering double the $625.50 paid or “demanded” for the fertilizer, as . . .

EGBERT v. BALTIMORE O. R. CO., 8 F. Cas. 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1868)

. . . The libel claims $625.50 as freight on 226 tons of coal, being a little over $2.76 per ton. . . .