Cases from cite.case.law:

LIDSKY, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,, 604 So. 2d 869 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . § 626.9702(1), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . Sentry’s decision not to renew thus violated sections 626.9541(l)(o )(3) and 626.9702(1). . . . was amply documented and was not based upon any factors prohibited by sections 626.9541(l)(o )(3), 626.9702 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY,, 449 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See Section 626.9702(1). . . . Section 626.9702(1), Florida Statutes (1983) provides: (1) No insurer shall impose or request an additional . . .

SENTRY INSURANCE, a v. R. BROWN, R. BROWN, v. SENTRY INSURANCE, a, 424 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . In 1977, the legislature enacted Section 626.9702, Florida Statutes (ch. 77-158, § 1, Laws of Florida . . . Applying Section 626.9702 to the situation before us, in which the insurer’s decision to nonrenew was . . . considered the first statutory prong to have been waived, Sentry would have been precluded by Section 626.9702 . . . relating to the traffic citation, may have determined there was inadequate proof, as required by Section 626.9702 . . . it would have been necessary in our judgment for the insurer, pursuant to the provisions of Section 626.9702 . . .