The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Likewise, section 627.701(4)(a), Florida Statutes, required a bold warning on the “face” of the policy . . .
. . . . § 627.701(4)(a) render a noncompliant hurricane deductible provision in an insurance policy void and . . .
. . . .” § 627.701 l(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
. . . See, e.g., § 627.701 l(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . .
. . . . § 627.701(4)(a). The Florida Supreme Court has now answered these two questions in the negative. . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a). . . .
. . . The complaint also claimed that QBE had violated Section 627.701(4)(a) of the Florida Statutes. . . . The jury also found that the insurance policy did not comply with Section 627.701(4)(a) of the Florida . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a)? . . . The jury also concluded that the Policy did not comply with § 627.701(4)(a). . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a)? 4. . . .
. . . (Chalfonte) appealed the dismissal of claims under section 627.701(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), and . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a) (Count IV). . . . The jury also concluded that the Policy did not comply with § 627.701(4)(a). . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a)? 4. . . . Other subsections of section 627.701 also offer clues as to the context of subsection (4)(a). . . .
. . . judgment establishing that the hurricane deductible in the Policies is void pursuant to Florida Statutes § 627.701 . . .
. . . See Florida Stat. § 627.701 (2004). . . . As an initial matter, I agree with Enclave that § 627.701 applies to this policy. Though Fla. . . . Because Enclave filed suit on May 15, 2009, § 627.701 applies to the subject policy. . . . Accordingly, the deductible limitation expressed in § 627.701(3)(a) does not apply here. . . . See §§ 627.701(8), 627.4025(2)(a). . . .
. . . that the Insurance Contract’s co-insurance provision is void and unenforceable for violating Section 627.701 . . . Defendant argues that, while Section 627.701(4)(a) requires that a hurricane deductible provision be . . . QBE submits that there is no independent cause of action for violating Section 627.701(4)(a). . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a)); El-Ad Residences at Miramar Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Ins. . . . Sept. 28, 2010) (“Even assuming that the windstorm deductible violated § 627.701, the statute does not . . .
. . . . § 627.701(l)(a-b) and (4)(a), and therefore the coinsurance and separate hurricane deductible provisions . . . Stats. §§ 627.701(l)(a-b) and (4)(a), in that the coinsurance and a separate hurricane deductible provisions . . .
. . . It also seeks a declaration that the policy fails to comply with Florida Statute Section 627.701 and, . . . offer it a deductible in the amount of 3% of the insured value in violation of Florida Statute Section 627.701 . . .
. . . See, e.g., § 627.701, Fla. Stat., et seq. . . .
. . . It also seeks a declaration that the policy fails to comply with Florida Statute Section 627.701 and . . . offer it a deductible in the amount of 3% of the insured value in violation of Florida Statute Section 627.701 . . . Florida Statute § 627.701 was in effect from December 21, 2004 through May 31, 2005 and provided that . . . Stat. § 627.701(8). . . . Stat. § 627.701(6)(a) (2004 version). . . .
. . . . § 627.701(4) by not putting the language in the proper font size and by substituting the word “windstorm . . .
. . . . § 627.701(4)(a) and whether an insurer’s failure to comply with § 627.701(4)(a) renders a hurricane . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a) (Count IV). . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a). . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a). . . . Stat. § 627.701(4)(a)? . . .
. . . . § 627.701. . . . Stat. § 627.701, citing to Chalfonte Condo. Apt. Ass’n v. QBE, 2007 WL 1489817 (S.D.Fla. . . . Stat. § 627.701. . . .
. . . , RTG argues that the NSO Deductible is void because it does not comply with the, requirements of § 627.701 . . . the following language in boldface type, no smaller than 18 points, as dictated by Florida Statute § 627.701 . . . Stat. § 627.701(4); however, it contends that this does not void the NSO Deductible here because: (1) . . . Validity of NSO Deductible under § 627.701(4)(a) The court has carefully reviewed the parties’ respective . . . RTG’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of the asserted § 627.701(4)(a) violation is accordingly . . .
. . . (a-b) and 627.701(4)(a), Florida Statutes, which would make the provisions concerning co-insurance and . . . above, QBE argues that Dome has not pled a claim for declaratory relief under Florida Statutes, section 627.701 . . . Dome’s counterclaim asserts that the insurance policy does not comply with the requirements of section 627.701 . . . decision explicitly voided the deductible provision of a policy for failure to comply with section 627.701 . . . Thus, Florida courts are willing to void the deductible provision for a failure to comply with section 627.701 . . .
. . . Specifically, Chalfonte asserted that the deductible provision violated Section 627.701(4)(a) of the . . . The plain meaning of the statute indicates that Section 627.701(4)(a) is mandatory. . . . First, I will address whether or not QBE violated Section 627.701(4)(a). . . . There is nothing ambiguous about Section 627.701(4)(a). . . . Section 627.701(4)(a), the section addressing hurricane deductibles, unlike Section 627.701(l)(a) which . . .
. . . the co-insurance payments are void because the Policy fails to comply with Florida statutes section 627.701 . . . Count IV is a claim for violation of Florida statutes section 627.701, alleging that the Policy fails . . . Stat. 627.701 for failure to designate properly the coinsurance provision in the Policy. . . .
. . . data/session/ 2005/Senate/bills/ billtext/pdi/ sl486cl.pdf (discussing statutory changes to section 627.701 . . . only minor damage, the deductible-deductibles in "hurricane” policies are strictly regulated, see § 627.701 . . .
. . . We note that section 627.701, Florida Statutes (1997), which places certain restrictions upon deductible . . .
. . . provision, and thus it is not void because it lacks the coinsurance disclosure required by section 627.701 . . . Section 627.701, Florida Statutes provides: 627.701. . . . THOMPSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur. . § 627.701, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Section 627.701(2) of Florida’s Statutes Annotated explicitly allows a property insurer to issue an insurance . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 627.701(5)(a) (West 1998). . . . .
. . . (1), Florida Statutes (1983), which provides: 627.701 Coinsurance contracts. — A property insurer may . . . Prior to the hereinafter discussed legislative amendment in 1982, the 1981 version of Section 627.701 . . . provided as follows: 627.701 Coinsurance contracts. — No property insurer shall issue any policy or . . . When a statute is amended, as Section 627.701 was amended in 1982, one may assume, unless a contrary . . . Similarly, the industry analysis prepared in conjunction with the revision of Section 627.701 commented . . .
. . . Scandia, Inc., 353 So.2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Sec. 627.701, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .