Cases from cite.case.law:

PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. FRY ENTERPRISES, INC. d b a O, 264 So. 3d 1008 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . appraisal and whether the appraisal provision of the policy violated the zero deductible statute, section 627.7288 . . . and compel appraisal on a wholly different basis, i.e., that the appraisal provision violated section 627.7288 . . .

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. SHL ENTERPRISES, LLC, a a o LLC, a a o SHL LLC, a a o LLC, a a o LLC, a a o LLC, a a o LLC, a a o s LLC, a a o LLC, a a o SHL LLC, a a o LLC, a a o SHL LLC, a a o LLC, a a o, 264 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . court departed from the essential requirements of the law by failing to analyze and interpret section 627.7288 . . . Progressive filed a reply, arguing that the appraisal provisions did not violate section 627.7288 because . . . However, rather than conducting its own analysis of section 627.7288 to determine whether the county . . . But where an insured makes a windshield-damage claim, section 627.7288 clearly states that deductible . . . Because we have concluded that the statutory language of section 627.7288 is clear, we do not need to . . .

U. S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. FIGUEROA,, 917 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Security for the unearned premium, pursuant to the section 627.7288, Florida Statutes (2000). . . .