Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 627.733 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 627.733 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 627.733

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 627.733
627.733 Required security.
(1)(a) Every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle, other than a motor vehicle used as a school bus as defined in s. 1006.25 or limousine, required to be registered and licensed in this state shall maintain security as required by subsection (3) in effect continuously throughout the registration or licensing period.
(b) Every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle used as a taxicab shall not be governed by paragraph (1)(a) but shall maintain security as required under s. 324.032(1), and s. 627.737 shall not apply to any motor vehicle used as a taxicab.
(2) Every nonresident owner or registrant of a motor vehicle which, whether operated or not, has been physically present within this state for more than 90 days during the preceding 365 days shall thereafter maintain security as defined by subsection (3) in effect continuously throughout the period such motor vehicle remains within this state.
(3) Such security shall be provided:
(a) By an insurance policy delivered or issued for delivery in this state by an authorized or eligible motor vehicle liability insurer which provides the benefits and exemptions contained in ss. 627.730-627.7405. Any policy of insurance represented or sold as providing the security required hereunder shall be deemed to provide insurance for the payment of the required benefits; or
(b) By any other method authorized by s. 324.031(2) or (3) and approved by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles as affording security equivalent to that afforded by a policy of insurance or by self-insuring as authorized by s. 768.28(16). The person filing such security shall have all of the obligations and rights of an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405.
(4) An owner of a motor vehicle with respect to which security is required by this section who fails to have such security in effect at the time of an accident shall have no immunity from tort liability, but shall be personally liable for the payment of benefits under s. 627.736. With respect to such benefits, such an owner shall have all of the rights and obligations of an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405.
(5) In addition to other persons who are not required to provide required security as required under this section and s. 324.022, the owner or registrant of a motor vehicle is exempt from such requirements if she or he is a member of the United States Armed Forces and is called to or on active duty outside the United States in an emergency situation. The exemption provided by this subsection applies only as long as the member of the armed forces is on such active duty outside the United States and applies only while the vehicle covered by the security required by this section and s. 324.022 is not operated by any person. Upon receipt of a written request by the insured to whom the exemption provided in this subsection applies, the insurer shall cancel the coverages and return any unearned premium or suspend the security required by this section and s. 324.022. Notwithstanding s. 324.0221(2), the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles may not suspend the registration or operator’s license of any owner or registrant of a motor vehicle during the time she or he qualifies for an exemption under this subsection. Any owner or registrant of a motor vehicle who qualifies for an exemption under this subsection shall immediately notify the department prior to and at the end of the expiration of the exemption.
History.ss. 4, 6, ch. 71-252; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 8, ch. 77-118; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 31, 32, ch. 77-468; s. 11, ch. 78-374; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 552, 563, ch. 82-243; s. 69, ch. 82-386; ss. 4, 6, ch. 86-182; s. 18, ch. 88-370; s. 57, ch. 89-282; s. 5, ch. 91-106; s. 4, ch. 91-110; s. 1, ch. 91-128; s. 77, ch. 93-120; s. 7, ch. 95-202; s. 30, ch. 95-211; s. 2, ch. 97-84; s. 362, ch. 97-102; s. 14, ch. 98-223; s. 34, ch. 99-3; ss. 63, 317, ch. 99-248; s. 1031, ch. 2002-387; s. 19, ch. 2003-2; s. 19, ch. 2003-411; s. 123, ch. 2004-5; s. 47, ch. 2006-290; s. 4, ch. 2007-150; s. 11, ch. 2007-324; s. 90, ch. 2013-160.
Note.Consolidation of s. 627.733 and former s. 627.735.

F.S. 627.733 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.733 on Casetext

Amendments to 627.733


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 627.733
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 627.733.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WELFORD, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 713 F. App'x 969 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 627.733, 627.736(1) (requiring owners or registrants of motor vehicles to obtain personal injury . . .

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. EDUARDO J. GARRIDO D. C. P. A., 211 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

CLASSY CYCLES, INC. v. BAY COUNTY, a a, 201 So. 3d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 627.733 in turn references sections 627.730 through 627.7405. . . . . §§ 627.733 and 627.736, Fla. Stat. . . .

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, v. GABLES INSURANCE RECOVERY, INC. a a o M., 159 So. 3d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Every insurance policy issued in compliance with section 627.733, Florida Statutes (2008), “shall provide . . .

ROBBINS, v. GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 62 F. Supp. 3d 1349 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . — An insurance policy complying with- the security requirements of s. 627.733 must provide personal . . .

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. VIRTUAL IMAGING SERVICES, INC., 141 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2013)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s.627.733 shall provide personal . . .

JIMINEZ, v. FACCONE,, 98 So. 3d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 627.733(1) provides that every vehicle required to be registered in the state must have security . . .

CENTRAL MAGNETIC IMAGING OPEN MRI OF PLANTATION, LTD. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 789 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 627.733). Florida Statute section 627.736 contains the requirements for PIP benefits. . . .

KINGSWAY AMIGO INSURANCE COMPANY, v. OCEAN HEALTH, INC. a a o, 63 So. 3d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

R. MENENDEZ, Jr. v. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE CO. INC., 35 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2010)

. . . See § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, INC. v., 961 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2007)

. . . See § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

D. GARCIA, v. VANGUARD CAR RENTAL USA, INC. a a US a f k a L. P. a a, 510 F. Supp. 2d 821 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 627.733 (setting forth Florida’s Motor Vehicle No-Fault Personal Injury Protection insurance standards . . .

SCOTT, v. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY,, 932 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. NICHOLS, v., 932 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2006)

. . . This purpose is accomplished through the provisions of section 627.733, which require that every owner . . . of a motor vehicle “maintain security as required by subsection (3).... ” § 627.733(1), Fla. . . . insurance policy ... which provides the benefits and exemptions contained in ss. 627.730-627.7405.” § 627.733 . . . State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 352 So.2d 1172 (Fla.1977): The provision of Section 627.733, that every . . .

LEINHART v. JURKOVICH,, 882 So. 2d 456 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 627.733(2), Fla. Stat. (1994). . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CENTRAL FLORIDA PHYSIATRISTS, P. A., 851 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

NICHOLS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL,, 851 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . .” § 627.733(1), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . .” § 627.733(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 352 So.2d 1172 (Fla.1977): The provision of Section 627.733, that every . . . 627.736(1), which provides that "[e]very insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 842 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2003)

. . . Finally, section 14 amends section 627.733, Florida Statutes which deals with suspension of a motor vehicle . . .

G. HARRIS, v. COTTON STATES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 821 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . -Every insurance policy complying with the security'requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 805 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Finally, section 14 amends section 627.733, Florida Statutes which deals with suspension of a motor vehicle . . .

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. RODRIGUEZ, v., 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

LORING, Jr. v. K. WINTERS,, 802 So. 2d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . 627.7405, under any insurance policy or other method of security complying with the requirements of s. 627.733 . . . , or by an owner personally liable under s. 627.733 for the payment of such benefits, unless a person . . .

MALDONADO, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

STATE v. BRADFORD,, 787 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 2001)

. . . See § 627.733, Fla.Stat. (2000). . . .

BUDGET RENT- A- CAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. CASTELLANO, a, 764 So. 2d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . 627.7405, under any insurance policy or other method of security complying with the requirements of s. 627.733 . . .

YOUNG, v. PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 753 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 2000)

. . . See § 627.733(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

UTVICH, v. FELIZOLA,, 742 So. 2d 847 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 627.733(1), Fla. . . .

BUDGET RENT- A- CAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. CASTELLANO, a, 737 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . 627.7405, under any insurance policy or other method of security complying with the requirements of § 627.733 . . .

BLISH, v. ATLANTA CASUALTY COMPANY,, 736 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1999)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

MILGRAM, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 731 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

DELTA CASUALTY COMPANY, v. PINNACLE MEDICAL, INC. M M, 721 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 627.733, Fla. Stat. . . .

A. HOLT, v. KING,, 707 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Florida Statutes section 627.733, entitled Required Security, requires all motor vehicle owners to maintain . . . See §§ 627.733(1), (3)(a), 627.736(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . , or by an owner personally liable under s. 627.733 for the payment of such benefits, unless a person . . . would be payable by a vehicle owner personally liable for the payment of such benefits under section 627.733 . . . A vehicle owner is personally liable for PIP benefits under section 627.733 when he or she fails to obtain . . .

BOLDEN, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., 689 So. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEE, 678 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1996)

. . . 627.736(1), Florida Statutes (1981), in all policies complying with the security requirements of section 627.733 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 645 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

MANSFIELD v. RIVERO, 620 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 1993)

. . . 627.7405, under any insurance policy or other method of security complying with the requirements of s. 627.733 . . . , or by an owner personally liable under s. 627.733 for the payment of such benefits, unless a person . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GOMEZ,, 605 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . §§ 627.733, 627.-736. . . .

LIPOF, v. FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY,, 596 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 1992)

. . . uninsured motorist coverage because it is “not an insurer or insurance company as recognized by sections 627.733 . . .

ESKER, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 593 So. 2d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

LEVY, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 580 So. 2d 190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . 627.736(1), Florida Statutes (1981), in all policies complying with the security requirements of section 627.733 . . .

PEARSON, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 560 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Allstate contends that section 627.733(1), Florida Statutes (1987), requires Pearson, as a co-owner, . . . We interpret the requirement of section 627.733(1) that each owner must “maintain security” to mean that . . .

LIPOF, v. FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY,, 558 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . because it was appellant’s employer and not an insurer or insurance company as recognized by sections 627.733 . . .

STATE FARM FIRE CASUALTY CO. v. J. PALMA,, 555 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1990)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

DEALERS INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. JON HALL CHEVROLET COMPANY, INC., 547 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 627.733, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. JOHNSON,, 536 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . verdict on the issue raised concerning his failure to have his vehicle insured as required by section 627.733 . . . personal injury protection benefits because appellee did not have his truck insured as required by section 627.733 . . . verdict in favor of appellee on the question of compliance with the security requirements of section 627.733 . . .

INTERNATIONAL BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ARNONE,, 528 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . 627.736(1) requires that “every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of section 627.733 . . .

FARMER, v. PROTECTIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 530 So. 2d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Statutes (1983), provides that “every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of § 627.733 . . .

STATE FARM FIRE CASUALTY CO. v. J. PALMA,, 524 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . treatment authorized and required under the personal injury protection benefits provided by section 627.733 . . . that a thermographic examination was not a necessary medical service within the meaning of section 627.733 . . .

VEGA v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a, 520 So. 2d 73 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

ATLAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. WOLFORT,, 506 So. 2d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

L. QUANSTROM, v. STANDARD GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 504 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 627.733(1), Florida Statutes (1985) requires security (PIP) for every owner or registrant of . . .

JACKSON, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION,, 502 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

T. BOMAN, Sr. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., 505 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . §§ 627.733-627.736, Fla. Stat. (1983); Hepler v. Atlas Mutual Insurance Co., 501 So.2d 681. . . .

HEPLER, v. ATLAS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 501 So. 2d 681 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 627.733(5), Fla. Stat. (1983). . . .

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. E. RYAN,, 500 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

C. HUNTER, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 498 So. 2d 514 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

J. PALMA, v. STATE FARM FIRE CASUALTY CO. a, 489 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

L. SPENCE, v. O. HUGHES, 485 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Specifically, section 627.733 sets forth the type or kind of security required and includes PIP coverage . . .

WILLIAMS, v. UTAH HOME FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 481 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . entered summary judgment for Utah based upon the applicable statutory, provisions, as follows: Section 627.733 . . . appellee, since Williams herself was not an owner of a vehicle at the time of the accident, under section 627.733 . . .

W. SNIDER, v. C. WANAMAKER,, 466 So. 2d 372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . belonging to a non-resident owner, he was not required to maintain Florida no-fault insurance under section 627.733 . . .

EPPERSON, v. DIXIE INSURANCE CO. a, 461 So. 2d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The passenger is deemed to be self-insured and personally liable for PIP benefits. § 627.733(4), Fla.Stat . . . Section 627.733(2) reads as follows: Every nonresident owner or registrant of a motor vehicle which, . . . Appellant argues that section 627.733(2) should be construed to mean that the vehicle must be physically . . . (1) to obtain no-fault insurance, including PIP coverage, regardless of the application of section 627.733 . . . Section 627.733(1), Florida Statutes (1981), reads: Every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle required . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY E. v. HOWARD,, 458 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . trial court granted appellee’s motion for a directed verdict, ruling that the tort exemption of section 627.733 . . .

FORTUNE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. P. OEHME,, 453 So. 2d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . ejvery owner or registrant of a motor vehicle required to be registered and licensed in this state_” § 627.733 . . .

SCHERZER, v. BERON Co., 455 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1981), requires only the owner or registrant of a motor vehicle to . . . Priority.— (1) REQUIRED BENEFITS. — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 . . .

PROTECTIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. HERNANDEZ,, 450 So. 2d 864 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . .— Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

INDUSTRIAL FIRE CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. KWECHIN,, 447 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1983)

. . . amount without subjecting the insured to any showing of financial responsibility as required by section 627.733 . . . Section 627.733(3)(b), Fla.Slat. (1977) provides: (b) Security may be provided with respect to any motor . . .

J. JULIAN v. JOHNSON, Jr., 438 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 627.733(2), Florida Statutes (1981), requires that non-resident owners of motor vehicles which . . . Florida Statutes (1981), says: Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 . . . neither the subject vehicle nor the appellant driver were required to have the PIP coverage under section 627.733 . . .

LEWIS, Jr. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., 425 So. 2d 100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See § 627.733(3)(a), Florida Statutes; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. . . .

GOIN, a By A. GOIN P. A. P. v. AUTO- OWNERS INSURANCE CO., 423 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 627.733, Florida Statutes (1981). This argument is based on a misreading of Reid. . . .

REEVES, v. MILLER, 418 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See ch. 324, Fla.Stat. (1975); § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (1975) (effective January 1, 1972). . . . See also ch. 77 468, § 31, Laws of Florida (amending section 627.733(3)(a), effective September 1, 1977 . . .

L. LIPPINCOTT, v. EXOTICA IMPORTS, INC., 413 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . proof that personal injury protection (PIP) benefits have been purchased as required under section 627.733 . . . When Peck purchased his automobile, section 627.733 required PIP benefits to the extent of $5,000 as . . .

W. CHAPMAN v. P. DILLON, Jr. P. M., 415 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . . 627.741, under any insurance policy or other method of security complying with the requirements of s. 627.733 . . . , or by an owner personally liable under s. 627.733 for the payment of such benefits, unless a person . . .

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, v. M. GORMAN E. s FIREMAN S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, v. M. GORMAN E., 404 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s.627.733 shall provide personal . . .

ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BUSHY,, 394 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . failed to carry no fault insurance, and therefore was a self-insurer under Florida Statutes, section 627.733 . . .

DENMARK, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 384 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . in which a motor vehicle is inoperable, its owner need not maintain security as required by Section 627.733 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PIERCE,, 383 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . As stated in Farley, supra, section 627.733(4) does not make the uninsured owner an insurer, so there . . . Entitled to personal injury benefits from the insurer of the owner or owners of such a motor vehicle. . § 627.733 . . .

DEESE, Jr. v. STATE, 378 So. 2d 887 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . See Sections 320.01(1), 627.733, 520.-02(1) and 627.732(1). . . .

WARD, v. FLORIDA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 375 So. 2d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . The fact that it was “temporarily immobile and inoperable”, said the court, “has no effect on Section 627.733 . . . Section 627.733(3) Florida Statutes (1975) “Required Security” sets forth the requirement of liability . . . Section 627.733(1) Florida Statutes (1975) provides: “(1) Every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle . . .

B. FAULKNER v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., 367 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1979)

. . . 627.741, under any insurance policy or other method of security complying with the requirements of s. 627.733 . . . , or by an owner personally liable under s. 627.733 for the payment of such benefits, unless a person . . . part: (1) REQUIRED BENEFITS. — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 . . .

WARD, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, C. JOHNSTON, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION,, 364 So. 2d 73 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . an insurance policy affording those benefits, by reason of the following language found in Section 627.733 . . . Personal liability is imposed by Section 627.733 as well as the loss of no fault tort immunity. . . .

COMEAU, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 356 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 1978)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

REID, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,, 352 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 1977)

. . . Specifically, she relies upon the language of Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1975). . . . The provision of Section 627.733, that every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle required to be registered . . .

ANDRIAKOS v. CAVANAUGH, 350 So. 2d 561 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 627.733(3)(a) of the Automobile Reparations Reform Act incorporates the coverage requirements . . . See Section 627.733(3)(a), Florida Statutes. . . .

SHERMAN, v. RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 350 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1971), provides that every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle . . . Surely the legislature in drafting § 320.01, § 320.02 and § 627.733, Florida Statutes, did not intend . . . licensed in this state, and therefore does not fall within the purview of the security requirements of § 627.733 . . .

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a v. WOLFSON,, 348 So. 2d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of § 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

MAIN INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. E. WIGGINS,, 349 So. 2d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . See § 627.733, Florida Statutes (1975). Ap-pellee did not own any automobile. . . .

REID v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 344 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Specifically, she relies upon the language of Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1975). . . . The provision of Section 627.733, that every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle required to be registered . . .

DIXIE FARMS, INC. v. HERTZ CORPORATION,, 343 So. 2d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . We believe that in accordance with Section 627.733(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), a self-insurer who . . .

WILLIAMS, v. LEATHERBY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 338 So. 2d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . The pivotal question is whether, under these facts, Section 627.733, Florida Statutes, requires security . . . Section 627.733(1), entitled “Required Security,” states as follows: “Every owner or registrant of a . . . The fact that it was temporarily immobile and inoperable has no effect on Section 627.733(1), Florida . . .

M. RAMOS, v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY J., 336 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1976)

. . . persuasive argument that because of the modern trend of requiring that motorists carry insurance [§ 627.733 . . .

TAPSCOTT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO., 330 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Sec. 627.733(1), F.S.1975. . . . registration requirements, and its owner is correspondingly excused from the security requirements of § 627.733 . . .

GRIFFIN, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 328 So. 2d 207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . — Every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of § 627.733 shall provide personal . . .

STALEY, v. FLORIDA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 328 So. 2d 241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Florida under § 320.35, F.S., and is therefore a vehicle in respect to which security is required by § 627.733 . . . security required in respect to that automobile by the Florida Automobile Reparations Reform Act, § 627.733 . . .

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. A. SMITH, a By, 328 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . provisions of the Florida Automobile Reparations Reform (No-Fault Insurance) Act, specifically §§ 627.732, 627.733 . . .

GREYHOUND RENT- A- CAR, INC. a v. CARBON, 327 So. 2d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . injured as a result of the accident, sued Greyhound for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under § 627.733 . . .

M. RAMOS, v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, J., 325 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . persuasive argument that because of the modern trend of requiring that motorists carry insurance [§ 627.733 . . .

COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. WILLIAMS, a, 309 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . is the owner of a motor vehicle that is not covered by insurance as required by Florida Statutes § 627.733 . . . position of the defendant Commercial Union Insurance Company is that under Florida Statutes §§ 627.732(4), 627.733 . . .

FARLEY, a v. GATEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 302 So. 2d 177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . required to look to his stepfather as an “insurer” under the provisions of §§ 627.736(4) (d) 4. and 627.733 . . . But Farley’s stepfather did not have coverage, so § 627.733(4), F.S.1971, is relevant; and that, as applied . . . The significance of this here is that § 627.733(4), supra, does not declare that a motor vehicle owner . . .

O. JOHNSON, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 297 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . 627.741, under any insurance policy or other method of security complying with the requirements of § 627.733 . . . establishes that security had been provided by both drivers (Stockton and Christensen) as required by sec. 627.733 . . . provisions of sec. 627.736, F.S., every insurance policy complying with the security requirements of sec. 627.733 . . .

COOPER v. RESERVE INSURANCE CO., 41 Fla. Supp. 7 (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. 1974)

. . . therefore liable for such personal injuries under provisions of §627, Florida Statutes ..particularly §§627.733 . . . (1), 627.733(4), 627.735 and 627.736. . . . With respect to such benefits, the owner has all the rights and obligations of an insurer. §§627.733( . . . he does not. §627.737(1) specifically refers to such liability of “an owner personally liable under §627.733 . . . from liability in tort for vehicular accidents, to persons meeting the insurance requirements of FS, §627.733 . . .