The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 627.7405

627.7405 Insurers’ right of reimbursement.—

(1) Notwithstanding ss. 627.730-627.7405, an insurer providing personal injury protection benefits on a private passenger motor vehicle shall have, to the extent of any personal injury protection benefits paid to any person as a benefit arising out of such private passenger motor vehicle insurance, a right of reimbursement against the owner or the insurer of the owner of a commercial motor vehicle, if the benefits paid result from such person having been an occupant of the commercial motor vehicle or having been struck by the commercial motor vehicle while not an occupant of any self-propelled vehicle.

¹(2) The insurer’s right of reimbursement under this section does not apply to an owner or registrant as identified in s. 627.733(1)(b).

History.—s. 7, ch. 78-374; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 558, 563, ch. 82-243; s. 19, ch. 2003-411; s. 18, ch. 2007-324; s. 18, ch. 2012-151; s. 12, ch. 2012-197.

¹Note.—As created by s. 12, ch. 2012-197. For a description of multiple acts in the same session affecting a statutory provision, see preface to the Florida Statutes, “Statutory Construction.” Subsection (2) was also created by s. 18, ch. 2012-151, and that version reads:

(2) For purposes of this section, no owner or registrant identified in s. 627.733(1)(b) shall be liable for right of reimbursement.

F.S. 627.7405 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.7405 on Casetext

Amendments to 627.7405

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 627.7405

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 627.7405.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. v. QUALITY DIAGNOSTIC HEALTH CARE, INC., 369 F. Supp. 3d 1292 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . this part in order to receive reimbursement under the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . regulated generally under Florida's Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law ("PIP Statute"), Fla Stat. §§ 627.730 -627.7405 . . . Stat. § 627.731 ("The purpose of ss. 627.730-627.7405 is to provide for medical, surgical, funeral, and . . .

IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. MSPA CLAIMS LLC,, 263 So. 3d 122 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . §§ 627.730 -627.7405, Fla. Stat. (2016). We use M.A.' . . .

BAILEY, v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, LLC,, 889 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . provider based on a provision of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, Florida Statutes §§ 627.730 - 627.7405 . . .

PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, v. FLORIDA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER a a o, 236 So. 3d 1183 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 627.730, Florida Statutes (2014), provides that "[s]ections 627.730-627.7405 may be cited and . . .

JOYCE, v. FEDERATED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 228 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 2017)

. . . See generally §§ 627.730-627.7405, Fla. Stat. (2017) ("Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law”). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FIRST CARE SOLUTION, INC., 232 F. Supp. 3d 1257 (S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405. . . .

CATHERINE S. CADLE, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 838 F.3d 1113 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

CLASSY CYCLES, INC. v. BAY COUNTY, a a, 201 So. 3d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . responsibility for owners and operators of motor vehicles, and the.no fault law in sections 627.730 through 627.7405 . . . Section 627.733 in turn references sections 627.730 through 627.7405. . . .

CARPENTER, v. CHAVEZ,, 200 So. 3d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . provides that “[a]n injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

WELFORD, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 190 F. Supp. 3d 1085 (N.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405], and property damage coverage under Fla. Stat. § 324.022. . . . .

ROBBINS, v. GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. a, 809 F.3d 583 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405, places on an insured’s personal injury protection (PIP) benefits where no medical . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AND STATE FARM FIRE CASUALTY COMPANY, v. B A DIAGNOSTIC, INC. n k a M. D. M. D., 145 F. Supp. 3d 1154 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405. . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. WILLIAMS,, 824 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405, car-accident victims that have purchased the mandatory PIP coverage have $10,000 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. WILLIAMS,, 563 F. App'x 665 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405, car-accident victims that have purchased the mandatory PIP coverage have $10,000 . . .

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. VIRTUAL IMAGING SERVICES, INC., 141 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2013)

. . . medical expenses in accordance with the terms of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, §§ 627.730-627.7405 . . . The Florida PIP statute is part of the broader Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, sections 627.730-627.7405 . . .

JIMINEZ, v. FACCONE,, 98 So. 3d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. VIRTUAL IMAGING SERVICES, INC. a a o, 90 So. 3d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Stat. (2008) (“Sections 627.730-627.7405 may be cited and known as the ‘Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. SWINDOLL,, 89 So. 3d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . in relevant part: An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, v. VIRTUAL IMAGING SERVICES, INC., 79 So. 3d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Within Florida’s Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, sections 627.730 — 627.7405, Florida Statutes (2008), is . . . Stat. (2008) (“Sections 627.730-627.7405 may be cited and known as the ‘Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY a k a A v. AFO IMAGING, INC., 71 So. 3d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . "Sections 627.730-627.7405 may be cited and known as the 'Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law.' ” § 627.730 . . .

CENTRAL MAGNETIC IMAGING OPEN MRI OF PLANTATION, LTD. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 789 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . policies were sold in Florida, the policies were subject to Florida Statute sections 627.730 through 627.7405 . . .

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. SANTA FE MEDICAL CENTER, a a o, 21 So. 3d 60 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .— Benefits due from an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 shall be primary, ... and shall be due and . . . and the amount of expenses and loss incurred which are covered by the policy issued under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. SALGADO,, 22 So. 3d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, sections 627.730-627.7405, Florida . . .

TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY, a d b a v. WOLENTARSKI,, 2 So. 3d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . responsible for such persons' acts or omissions, where "security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

GRANADA INSURANCE COMPANY, v. MARK A. CERECEDA, D. C. P. A., 997 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . — Benefits due from an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 shall be primary, . . and shall be due and . . .

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. RURAL METRO CORPORATION OF FLORIDA,, 994 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . if a request is made by an insurer providing personal injury protection benefits under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . subsection 627.736(8), Florida Statutes: With respect to any dispute under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. STAND- UP MRI OF ORLANDO,, 990 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . PIP is part of the “Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law,” sections 627.730-627.7405, Florida Statutes, . . . ), which provides in part: (4) Benefits; when due. — Benefits due from an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, INC. v., 961 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Section 627.730, Florida Statutes (2006), states that ",[s]ections 627.730-627.7405 may be cited and . . .

SCOTT, v. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY,, 932 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See §§ 627.730-627.7405, Florida Statutes (2002). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. NICHOLS, v., 932 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2006)

. . . a) [b]y an insurance policy ... which provides the benefits and exemptions contained in ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. McDERMOTT, 929 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . provides that ''[a]n injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

PADILLA, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL,, 934 So. 2d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The purpose of the Florida PIP statute, sections 627.730-627.7405, is: [T]o provide for medical, surgical . . .

FISCHER, v. ALESSANDRINI,, 907 So. 2d 569 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . as defined in section 627.732(1) and Fischer had complied with the requirements of sections 627.730-627.7405 . . .

PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PHYSICIAN S INJURY CARE CENTER, INC., 906 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 897 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 2005)

. . . the reasons set forth below, we approve the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision that section 627.7405 . . . State Farm then requested reimbursement from Amerisure under the provisions of section 627.7405, requiring . . . State Farm then sued Amerisure, claiming a right to reimbursement under section 627.7405. . . . The Fifth District upheld the constitutionality of section 627.7405, in part because it concluded that . . . Where, as here, no suspect class or fundamental right is implicated, section 627.7405 "must be upheld . . .

MALU, v. SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v., 898 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2005)

. . . The purpose of the PIP statute is described as follows: The purpose of ss. 627.730-627.7405 is to provide . . .

TUCKER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 883 So. 2d 357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . protection (“PIP”) benefits from the Ap-pellee Tucker Transportation Company, Incorporated, under section 627.7405 . . . copy of the insurance policy to the complaint, (ii) Tucker was immune from the operations of section 627.7405 . . . to allege a statutory right to reimbursement, and (iv) without a required finding of fault, section 627.7405 . . . The Court then concluded that section 627.7405 did not require a finding of fault and did not violate . . . Is section 627.7405 unconstitutional to the extent it allows an insurer reimbursement from an employer . . .

FELGENHAUER, v. BONDS,, 891 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, or his or . . .

M. CARUSO, v. BAUMLE,, 880 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 2004)

. . . An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, or his or . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. BARNES FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC,, 875 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . — • * * * (8) With respect any dispute under the provision of section 627.730-627.7405 between the . . .

AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 865 So. 2d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in an action in which State Farm sought reimbursement under section 627.7405 . . . State Farm then sought reimbursement from Amerisure pursuant to section 627.7405. . . . Section 627.7405 provides: Notwithstanding any other provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, any insurer . . . Amerisure rightly concedes that section 627.7405 serves a legitimate governmental purpose. . . . We also note that although the constitutionality of section 627.7405 has never been addressed by this . . .

MEYER, v. A. HUTCHINSON F., 861 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

NICHOLS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL,, 851 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . a) [b]y an insurance policy ... which provides the benefits and exemptions contained in ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . Stat. (2001) ("The purpose of ss. 627.730-627.7405 is to provide ... a limitation on the right to claim . . . Stat. (2001) ("An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

M. CARUSO, a v. BAUMLE,, 835 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, or his or . . .

GILES v. LUCKIE,, 816 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . it found that the permanency threshold of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, sections 627.730-627.7405 . . .

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. RODRIGUEZ, v., 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001)

. . . .' — Sections 627.730-627.7405 may be cited and known as the “Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law.” 627.731 . . . Purpose. — The purpose of ss. 627.730-627.7405 is to provide for medical, surgical, funeral, and disability . . . and the amount of expenses and loss incurred which are covered by the policy issued under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . PROVISION REGULATING ATTORNEY’S FEES. — With respect to any dispute under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

SMILEY A. v. A. NELSON, 805 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . failed to meet the permanency threshold of the Florida Motor Vehicle No Fault Law, sections 627.730-627.7405 . . .

LORING, Jr. v. K. WINTERS,, 802 So. 2d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . 1) are payable for such injury, or would be payable but for any exclusion authorized by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. JONES,, 789 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . — Benefits due from an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 shall be primary,.... . . .

M. OWEN, v. R. MORRISEY, Jr. B., 793 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

MALDONADO, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . and goals of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, which is codified at sections 627.730 through 627.7405 . . .

McKENNA, v. I. CARLSON a k a I., 771 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Carlson was barred or reduced in accordance with the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, §§ 627.730-627.7405 . . . An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, or his or . . .

BUDGET RENT- A- CAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. CASTELLANO, a, 764 So. 2d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, or his or . . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . 1) are payable for such injury, or would be payable but for any exclusion authorized by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

U. S. SECURITY INSURANCE CO. v. CAHUASQUI,, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . — With respect to any dispute under the provisions of ss. 627.730 — 627.7405 between the insured and . . . . — With respect to any dispute under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 between the insured and . . .

AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DAIDONE,, 760 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . and the amount of expenses and loss incurred which are covered by the policy issued under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

ROLLINS, v. PIZZARELLI,, 761 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2000)

. . . 3) provides that “An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of §§ 627.730-627.7405 . . . An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, or his legal . . . provides in relevant part: (4) BENEFITS; WHEN DUE. — Benefits due from an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . and the amount of expenses and loss incurred which are covered by the policy issued under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PINNACLE MEDICAL, INC. M M v. M M, 753 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2000)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . .

UTVICH, v. FELIZOLA,, 742 So. 2d 847 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . s taxi was exempt from the requirements of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, sections 627.730-627.7405 . . .

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, v. G. PHILLIPS,, 740 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . defined in s. 627.732(1) when the owner of such vehicle has complied with the requirements of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

BUDGET RENT- A- CAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. CASTELLANO, a, 737 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of §§ 627.730-627.7405, or his or . . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by §§ 627.730-627.7405 . . . (1) are payable for such injury, or would be payable but for any exclusion authorized by §§ 627.730-627.7405 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DIXON, 732 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by s[ection]s 627.730-627.7405 . . .

GHAEENZADEH, v. J. ALLAN,, 723 So. 2d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, or his or . . .

DELTA CASUALTY COMPANY, v. PINNACLE MEDICAL, INC. M M, 721 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . In that case, this court declared section 627.7405, Florida Statutes (1985) to be constitutional. . . .

M. ASSI, v. FLORIDA AUTO AUCTION OF ORLANDO, INC., 717 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . PIP benefits due from an insurer under section 627.730-627.7405, are deemed to be primary. . . .

E. PATE v. RENFROE, II,, 715 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . statute states: An injured party who is entitled to bring •.suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

DERIUS, v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 723 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405, Florida Statutes (1993). . . . .

A. HOLT, v. KING,, 707 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . 1) are payable for such injury, or would be payable but for any exclusion authorized by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . benefits, such an owner shall have all of the rights and obligations of an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

RODRIGUEZ v. CIGNA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY,, 956 F. Supp. 544 (M.D. Pa. 1996)

. . . Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law (627.730-627.7405) provides in pertinent part as follows: “Recovery . . .

J. MARTINEZ, a k a F. v. FORTUNE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 684 So. 2d 201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . — Benefits due from an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 shall be primary, except that benefits received . . . and the amount of expenses and loss incurred which are covered by the policy issued under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

L. HANNAH, v. NEWKIRK,, 675 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1996)

. . . responsible for any such person’s acts or omissions who is made exempt from tort liability by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . responsible for any such person’s acts or omissions who is made exempt from tort liability by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

M. STELLAS, v. ALAMO RENT- A- CAR, INC., 673 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . That section is part of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law which encompasses sections 627.730-627.7405 . . . In part “[t]he purpose of ss. 627.730-627.7405 is to provide ..., with respect to motor vehicle accidents . . . accident” as we believe that term was meant to be used by the legislature when it enacted sections 627.730-627.7405 . . .

AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CHERWIN,, 673 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The owner of a motor vehicle with respect to which security is required under ss. 627.730-627.7405; or . . .

NEWKIRK, v. L. HANNAH,, 655 So. 2d 241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . responsible for any such person’s acts or omissions who is made exempt from tort liability by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. S. HASSEN S., 650 So. 2d 128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

CITY OF TAMPA, v. J. D. LONG,, 638 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1994)

. . . ... of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

DAUKSIS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 623 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1993)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

MANSFIELD v. RIVERO, 620 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 1993)

WILKINS, f k a v. P. PALUMBO,, 617 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . cases involving soft tissue injuries under the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, sections 627.730-627.7405 . . .

SMEY, v. WILLIAMS, 608 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . defendant’s argument at trial seemed to be that the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law (§§ 627.730-627.7405 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GOMEZ,, 605 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

COMMERCIAL CLEAN- UP ENTERPRISES, INC. T. v. HOLMQUIST J., 597 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DAUKSIS, 596 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . have the requisite security, which entails the minimum insurance coverage provided in sections 627.730-627.7405 . . .

LIPOF, v. FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY,, 596 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 1992)

. . . compliance with the Florida No Fault Law has all the “obligations and rights of an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

POWELL, v. NAPOLITANO,, 578 So. 2d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

POWERS, v. JOHNSON,, 562 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

CHOTER v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 37 Fla. Supp. 2d 113 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1989)

. . . F.S. 627.736(4) provides: “(4) BENEFITS WHEN DUE-Benefits due from an insurer under §§ 627.730-627.7405 . . .

DEALERS INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. JON HALL CHEVROLET COMPANY, INC., 547 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Dealers Insurance Company’s action seeking reimbursement from Jon Hall Chevrolet Company under Section 627.7405 . . . Dealers later filed suit under section 627.7405 against Jon Hall to recover PIP benefits it paid. . . . Section 627.7405, Florida Statutes (1985), provides: 627.7405. . . . Insurers’ right to reimbursement Notwithstanding any other provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, any insurer . . . Accordingly, we find section 627.7405 to be constitutional. . . .

VERDECIA, v. AMERICAN RISK ASSURANCE COMPANY, a, 543 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . responsible for any such person’s acts or omissions who is made exempt from tort liability by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

DUBRIAN, v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, a, 538 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . which provides: An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

HALFHILL v PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 32 Fla. Supp. 2d 33 (Volusia Cty. Ct. 1988)

. . . . §§ 627.730 - 627.7405) and seeks in this action to recover sums paid to others to perform work which . . .

GREER, v. STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 530 So. 2d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . .-730-627.7405 shall be primary, except that benefits received under any workers’ compensation law or . . .

PUGH, L. v. WILSON, Jr., 693 F. Supp. 1096 (S.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . . §§ 627.730-627.7405. . . .

J. MAGLIO, v. NECA- IBEW WELFARE TRUST FUND,, 506 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . subdivision of the state from the definition of a “motor vehicle" as that term is “used in §§ 627.730-627.7405 . . .

L. QUANSTROM, v. STANDARD GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 504 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . is not the owner of a motor vehicle as to which PIP coverage is required by sections 627.730 through 627.7405 . . .

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. E. RYAN,, 500 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . not himself the owner of a motor vehicle with respect to which security is required under ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

L. SPENCE, v. O. HUGHES, 500 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1987)

. . . Are non-residents who voluntarily obtain PIP coverage conforming to Florida’s no-fault law (§ 627.730-627.7405 . . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . .

L. SPENCE, v. O. HUGHES, 485 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . non-resident) of a motor vehicle with respect to which security, of the type or kind required by ss. 627.730-627.7405 . . . Are non-residents who voluntarily obtain PIP coverage conforming to Florida’s no-fault law (§ 627.730-627.7405 . . .

TOMLINSON, v. ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 785 F.2d 933 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by §§ 627.730-627.7405 . . .

ORTIZ, a By ATEHOURTA v. BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY,, 475 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . (Sections 627.730 — 627.7405 are currently known as the "Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law." § 627.730 . . .

C. STURGIS, v. FORTUNE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 475 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . The owner of a motor vehicle with respect to which security is required under ss. 627.730-627.7405. . . .