Cases from cite.case.law:

MORRISON, v. HOMEWISE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, 209 So. 3d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . receiver for Homewise for purposes of rehabilitation and issuing an automatic mandatory stay under section 631.041 . . . insurer when the Department of Finance files a delinquency petition against . the insolvent insurer. § 631.041 . . .

FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. MENDOZA, 193 So. 3d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 631.041(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . and that stay is permanent because of the Consent Order requiring the liquidation of First Home. § 631.041 . . . The plaintiffs action against the insolvent insurer is permanently stayed by virtue of section 631.041 . . .

LAKECHEA, v. MAGNOLIA INSURANCE COMPANY,, 146 So. 3d 1207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Compare § 631.041, Fla. Stat. (2010) with § 631.57(2)(c). . . .

DEVONSHIRE AT PGA NATIONAL, LLC, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA,, 103 So. 3d 1060 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . order to allow Devonshire to appeal, which it has done; it also granted an automatic stay under section 631.041 . . .

FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. OLYMPUS ASSOCIATION, INC. a, 34 So. 3d 791 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . 2006, Southern Family was placed in receivership for liquidation purposes, and pursuant to section 631.041 . . .

OCEAN BANK, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Co., 902 So. 2d 833 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The receivership court entered a notice of automatic stay under section 631.041(1), Florida Statutes . . .

FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY, v. AMERICAN TITLE SERVICES,, 838 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 631.041(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (2002). . . .

MANTERO- ATIENZA, M. D. v. J. SALVADOR,, 807 So. 2d 163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . argument that a stay should not be issued because the stay in this case is not within the scope of section 631.041 . . . Regardless of whether section 631.041 applies, the New York court in its Order of Rehabilitation has . . .

STAFFING CONCEPTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PAUL,, 704 So. 2d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for a stay pursuant to section 631.041, Florida Statutes . . . included appointment of the Department of Insurance as the receiver and a stay provision, pursuant to 631.041 . . . Staffing moved for a stay of the proceedings pursuant to section 631.041, as it had done previously in . . . In Forshey, the court held, inter alia, that section 631.041 stays proceedings only against the insolvent . . .

PAYROLL TRANSFERS INTERSTATE, INC. v. FORSHEY,, 694 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . the workers’ compensation proceedings should have been stayed pursuant to the provisions of section 631.041 . . . The only stay provision in chapter 631 which was asserted to bar these proceedings is section 631.041 . . . PTI argues that it should have been protected under section 631.041 because the receiver has the power . . . Section 631.041 only stays proceedings against the insurer or its assets. . . . So.2d 334, 334-35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (“only the insurer is protected by the provisions of section 631.041 . . .

AMERICAN BONDING COMPANY, v. COASTAL METAL SALES, INC., 679 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Just as the state of Florida would expect Arizona to honor a stay pursuant to section 631.041, Florida . . .

In RECEIVERSHIP OF GUARANTEE SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a J. PETER, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE,, 678 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Sections 631.041(l)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes, provide that a petition for an order of rehabilitation . . . Section 631.041(2) authorizes the receivership court to grant relief from “the stay against obtaining . . . To the extent that section 631.041(4) may be read to authorize the issuance of an injunction “to prevent . . . being removed as a nominal party in Seapine’s action against appellants, but we do not read section 631.041 . . . The Florida Statute 631.041 automatic stay and injunctions contained in the August 12, 1991 Order of . . . automatic stay in place, asserting that the court had exceeded its statutory authority under section 631.041 . . . Noting that sections 631.041(l)(a) and (b) provide that a petition for an order of rehabilitation of . . . To the extent that section 631.041(4) maybe read to authorize the issuance of an injunction “to prevent . . . being removed as a nominal party in Seapine’s action against appellants, but we do not read section 631.041 . . . simply modified that portion of its “discretionary injunction,” issued under the authority of section 631.041 . . . Sea-pine did not establish the requisite justification for issuance of an injunction pursuant to section 631.041 . . . It argues that section 631.041(4) “does not prohibit actions against the Department of Insurance as receiver . . .

JIMMY LANG S AUTO SERVICE Co. v. L. PROCTOR,, 667 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . judicial and administrative proceedings against the insurer or its assets in accordance with section 631.041 . . . led us to the preliminary conclusion that only the insurer is protected by the provisions of section 631.041 . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, v. CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY,, 660 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . insurer’s assets, an act Cypress clearly accomplished by its settlement agreement in violation of section 631.041 . . .

W. SNYDER, W. P. A. a v. H. DOUGLAS, a k a B. Jr. B. III,, 647 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . FIGA also alleged that such a stay was appropriate under section 631.041. . . .

WESTCOTT, v. THOMAS, M. L. a, 819 F. Supp. 1056 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . judicial action against the Plan, or the enforcement of any judgment against the Plan, pursuant to Section 631.041 . . .

NOVA INSURANCE GROUP, INC. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE,, 606 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . The order also gives notice pursuant to section 631.041(1), Florida Statutes, that the department’s petition . . . The department insists that the stay was appropriate pursuant to section 631.041(l)(a) which prohibits . . . as defined in section 631.011(15), and therefore, it should not have been stayed pursuant to section 631.041 . . . Section 631.041(2) describes the procedure by which a person affected by the automatic stay may seek . . .

DOLAN v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST, a Co., 566 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . We note that subsequently section 631.041, Florida Statutes, has been amended to provide for an automatic . . .

A. SIERRA, M. D. E. f k a v. INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, INC. a, 538 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . The question presented is whether section 631.041, Florida Statutes, provides an automatic stay of an . . . While this appeal was pending, the legislature amended section 631.041, effective August 5, 1988, which . . . added) We hold, in response to the question presented, that the automatic stay provision of section 631.041 . . .