The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 641
HEALTH CARE SERVICE PROGRAMS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 641.25

641.25 Administrative penalty in lieu of suspension or revocation.—If the office finds that one or more grounds exist for the revocation or suspension of a certificate issued under this part, the office may, in lieu of revocation or suspension, impose a fine upon the health maintenance organization. With respect to any nonwillful violation, the fine must not exceed $2,500 per violation. Such fines may not exceed an aggregate amount of $25,000 for all nonwillful violations arising out of the same action. With respect to any knowing and willful violation of a lawful order or rule of the office or commission or a provision of this part, the office may impose upon the organization a fine in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for each such violation. Such fines may not exceed an aggregate amount of $250,000 for all knowing and willful violations arising out of the same action. The commission must adopt by rule penalty categories that specify varying ranges of monetary fines for willful violations and for nonwillful violations.

History.—s. 9, ch. 72-264; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 21, ch. 78-95; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 786, 804, 809(1st), ch. 82-243; s. 6, ch. 83-198; s. 7, ch. 87-236; s. 10, ch. 88-388; ss. 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 21, ch. 96-199; s. 1567, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 641.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 641.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 641.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 641.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 641.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WESTSIDE EKG ASSOCIATES, v. FOUNDATION HEALTH a f k a PCA f k a f k a PCA, 932 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . the recommendation and issue an order which may include fines or sanctions under the Act, sections 641.25 . . .

In ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE ERISA LITIGATION v. On v. L., 310 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Tex. 2004)

. . . and public trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (¶¶ 641.1, 641.3, 641.7, 641.12, 641.17, 641.21, 641.25 . . .

In M. MARTZ,, 293 B.R. 409 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2002)

. . . also listed one secured claim for Fifty-nine Thousand Six Hundred Forty-one and 25/100 dollars ($59,-641.25 . . .

In POOLE, K. v. U. B., 242 B.R. 104 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1999)

. . . David Miller: of that amount, $641.25 shall be disbursed to Mr. . . .

BANCAMERICA COMMERCIAL CORPORATION ASARCO v. TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., 900 F. Supp. 1427 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . $312.50 $3,221.25 63.27% $162.53 $102.83 $3,324.08 8/88 9/15/88 $4,805.00 $1,351.25 $100.00 $610.00 $641.25 . . .

C. BLIM, E. J. F. V. L. S. N. v. WESTERN ELECTRIC CO. INC. a, 496 F. Supp. 818 (W.D. Okla. 1980)

. . . Loss of participation in Bell System Savings Plan 1,062.26 265.57 Loss of Social Security Benefits 641.25 . . .

A. TEICHNER B. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 453 F.2d 944 (2d Cir. 1972)

. . . Court that the Teichners owed income taxes in the amount of $12,825.05 and a penalty in the amount of $641.25 . . .

OTTO BRIMBERRY v. THE UNITED STATES, 98 Ct. Cl. 335 (Ct. Cl. 1943)

. . . . $641.25, on the allegation.that his dismissal was unlawful. . . .