Cases from cite.case.law:

FLYNN, v. WILLIAMS MASONRY,, 233 F.R.D. 176 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

. . . the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers for work performed in Local 35 PA; • $647.03 . . . Local 35 PA; and it is further ORDERED that damages should be paid to the plaintiffs in the amount of $647.03 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. E. BESLER COMPANY, a c F. a c Co., 557 F.2d 270 (C.C.P.A. 1977)

. . . In that case spring hinges were classified as hinges under item 647.03, TSUS, since they were primarily . . .

v. E. a c, 64 C.C.P.A. 121 (C.C.P.A. 1977)

. . . In that case spring hinges were classified as hinges under item 647.03, TSUS, since they were primarily . . .

v., 75 Cust. Ct. 58 (Cust. Ct. 1975)

. . . merchandise consisting of “single action spring hinges” was classified as hinges, n.s.p.f. under item 647.03 . . .

v., 74 Cust. Ct. 134 (Cust. Ct. 1975)

. . . The brackets involved herein were classified under item 647.03, Tariff Schedules of the United States . . . coated or plated with precious metal: Of iron or steel, of aluminum, or of zinc: H* H* H* Hi Hi Hs H» 647.03 . . . The rule does not prohibit said classification, plaintiff urges, because item 647.03, sufra, contains . . . Defendant, however, contends item 647.03, sufra, is a specific provision within the intendment of rule . . .

v., 70 Cust. Ct. 243 (Cust. Ct. 1973)

. . . brackets described on the invoice as “1230X1 Shelf Brackets Black Jap” -which, were classified under item 647.03 . . . Not coated or plated with precious metal: Of iron or steel, of aluminum, or of zinc: # # Jjf ‡ ‡ * * 647.03 . . .

TRANS- ATLANTIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 471 F.2d 1397 (C.C.P.A. 1973)

. . . Wrought Steel Single Action Template Spring Hinges * * was classified under a provision for hinges, item 647.03 . . . similar uses: all the foregoing of base metal, whether or not coated or plated with precious metal: Item 647.03 . . . a determination of the meaning of the eo nomine provision for ‘hinges’ as this term is used in item 647.03 . . . not change their basic characteristics or identity as a species of hinge within the ambi.t of item 647.03 . . . This clearly results in a hinge classification under item 647.03. . . .

v., 60 C.C.P.A. 100 (C.C.P.A. 1973)

. . . similar uses; all the foregoing of base metal, whether or not coated or plated with precious metal: Item 647.03 . . . a determination of the meaning of the eo nomine provision for ‘hinges’ as this term is used in item 647.03 . . . does not change their basic characteristics or identity as a species of hinge within the ambit of item 647.03 . . . This clearly results in a hinge classification imder item 647.03. . . . item 646.95 because that provision, relating as it does to door closers, is a use provision while item 647.03 . . .

Co. v., 68 Cust. Ct. 138 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . The other section preserves the residual coverage of iron or steel, of aluminum, or of zinc in item 647.03 . . .

v., 67 Cust. Ct. 296 (Cust. Ct. 1971)

. . . Action Template Spring Hinges”, was assessed with duty at 17 per centum ad valorem under TSTJS item 647.03 . . . Hot coated or plated with precious metal: Of iron or steel, or aluminum, or of zinc: ❖ % # * ifc * ❖ 647.03 . . . a determination of the meaning of the eo nomine provision for “hinges” as this term is used in item 647.03 . . . does not change their basic characteristics or identity as a species of hinge within the ambit of item 647.03 . . .

A. L. v., 65 Cust. Ct. 85 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . merchandise was classified by the Government as fittings and mountings suitable for furniture under item 647.03 . . . defendant states: “[I]f the record here suffices to establish affirmatively that classification under item 647.03 . . . ¡* 647.03 Other_ 19% ad val. . . . at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem which was the appropriate rate under both items 657.20 and 647.03 . . . imported article is a “bolt,” it is more specifically provided for under item 646.54 than under item 647.03 . . .