Cases from cite.case.law:

COLUMBIA BANK, v. TURBEVILLE, St., 143 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . asserts that the Bank had no interest to protect because it was immune from liability pursuant to section 655.78 . . .

SANDLER, v. JAFFE,, 913 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . At trial, appellant improperly relied on section 655.78(1), Florida Statutes (2003), to advance her position . . . Section 655.78(1) provides as follows: Unless otherwise expressly provided in a contract, agreement or . . . The intent of section 655.78(1) is to protect a financial institution from liability for distributing . . .

MULATO, v. MULATO,, 705 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . According to section 655.78, the funds in a deposit account in the names of two or more persons may be . . .

L. JONES, a k a v. BARNETT BANK OF VOLUSIA COUNTY,, 670 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Repealed in 1992 by Ch. 92-303, § 189, at 2422, Laws of Fla., and replaced by § 655.78, Fla.Stat. . . .

In ESTATE OF H. H. HERRING, HERRING, v. A. HENDERSON,, 670 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . abridge, impair, or affect the validity, effectiveness, or operation of any of the provisions of ss. 655.78 . . .