Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 658.40 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 658.40 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 658.40

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVIII
BANKS AND BANKING
Chapter 658
BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 658.40
658.40 Definitions for merger and consolidation.As used in the provisions of this code relating to the merger and consolidation of banks and trust companies, unless the context requires otherwise:
(1) “Constituent bank or trust company” means a bank or a state trust company which is a party to a merger.
(2) “Merger” includes consolidation.
(3) “Resulting bank or trust company” means the consolidated bank or state trust company which is, or is to be, carrying on business upon completion of a consolidation; and, in the case of a merger, means the bank or state trust company into which the other constituent banks or trust companies are, or are to be, merged.
(4) “Successor institution” means a banking corporation or a trust company organized under the laws of this state to which the office has not issued a certificate of authorization, as provided in s. 658.25, to conduct a banking business or trust business, the sole purpose of the organization of which is to facilitate a plan of merger, reorganization, or consolidation.
History.s. 4, ch. 28016, 1953; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 30, 151, 152, ch. 80-260; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 27, 51, ch. 84-216; s. 1, ch. 91-307; ss. 1, 124, ch. 92-303; s. 1785, ch. 2003-261.
Note.Former s. 661.01.

F.S. 658.40 on Google Scholar

F.S. 658.40 on Casetext

Amendments to 658.40


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 658.40
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 658.40.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CRANDALL v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, d b a a, 594 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (D. Colo. 2009)

. . . Those costs amount to $ 658.40. Next, the Defendant seeks the cost of deposing Robert Nixon. Mr. . . .

E. FELDMAN, v. CAPITOL PIECE DYE WORKS, INC., 185 F. Supp. 426 (S.D.N.Y. 1960)

. . . .-53, to Gilbert Koenig for $658.40, to a salesman, Robert Lee, for $867.60, to Milton Mandel, another . . .