Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES, v. OXFORD INTERNATIONAL CORP., 517 F.2d 1374 (C.C.P.A. 1975)

. . . out of a provision for “Internal combustion engines * * * Compression-ignition engines,” TSUS Item 660.42 . . .

v., 62 C.C.P.A. 102 (C.C.P.A. 1975)

. . . out of a provision for “Internal combustion engines * * * Compression-ignition engines,” TSUS Item 660.42 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. HOWARD HARTRY, INC. Co., 477 F.2d 1400 (C.C.P.A. 1973)

. . . The court held the merchandise to be dutiable at 10 percent ad valorem under item 660.42, TSUS, as compression-ignition . . . under: Internal combustion engines and parts thereof: Piston-type engines: * * * * * * Other: Item 660.42 . . . We reverse as we agree with appellant that classification within item 660.42 would be improper. . . .

v. Co., 60 C.C.P.A. 140 (C.C.P.A. 1973)

. . . The court held the merchandise to be dutiable at 10 percent ad valorem under item 660.42, TSUS, as compression-ignition . . . Claimed under: Internal combustion engines and parts thereof: Piston-type engines: Other: Item 660.42 . . . We reverse as we agree with appellant that classification within item 660.42 would be improper. . . .

Co. v., 67 Cust. Ct. 352 (Cust. Ct. 1971)

. . . centum ad valorem, were, inter alia, properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under TSUS item 660.42 . . . Decision and judgment sustaining the claim in protest 67/60386 under TSUS item 660.42 was entered October . . . by the entries in these protests are properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under TSUS item 660.42 . . .

Co. v., 67 Cust. Ct. 284 (Cust. Ct. 1971)

. . . plaintiff contends that the merchandise should be classified as compression ignition engines under item 660.42 . . . part of government, granted a motion to amend the protest to add a claim of 10 per centum under item 660.42 . . . before the court in this protest is whether the merchandise is diesel engines within the purview of item 660.42 . . . $ $ $ $ $ Other: 660.42 Compression-ignition engines_10% ad val. . . . plaintiff’s claim for classification of the disputed articles covered by protest 67/60386 under item 660.42 . . .