Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 660.45 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 660.45 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 660.45

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVIII
BANKS AND BANKING
Chapter 660
TRUST BUSINESS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 660.45
660.45 Common trust fund court accountings.Unless ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, the trust company or trust department operating such common trust funds is not required to render a court accounting with regard to such funds; but it may, by application to the circuit court, secure approval of such an accounting after such notice and on such conditions as the court may establish.
History.s. 3, ch. 28016, 1953; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 143, 151, 152, ch. 80-260; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; s. 1, ch. 91-307; s. 1, ch. 92-303.
Note.Former s. 660.14.

F.S. 660.45 on Google Scholar

F.S. 660.45 on Casetext

Amendments to 660.45


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 660.45
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 660.45.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GREENPEACE FOUNDATION, v. MINETA, D. NWHI, 122 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. Haw. 2000)

. . . . ยง 660.45. The NEPA claim is justiciable for an additional reason. . . .

In UNISYS CORPORATION RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS ERISA LITIGATION, 886 F. Supp. 445 (E.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . $5,961.24 Mansfield & Tanick: $30,883.89 x .88 = $27,177.82 Meagher & Geer: $54,571.92 x .91 = $49,-660.45 . . .

RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS ORANGE GROWERS ASS N v. STEBLER STEBLER v. RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS ORANGE GROWERS ASS N, 240 F. 703 (9th Cir. 1917)

. . . of sales, must for the same reasons be reduced from $815.85 (based upon total sales of $18,375) to $660.45 . . . patented sizers, $14,875, when reduced by the manufacturing cost of $4,929.15 and the overhead expense of $660.45 . . . allowance as for overhead expense on the part of plaintiff, which we have reduced in this opinion to $660.45 . . .