Cases from cite.case.law:

WALTON, v. TOMAX CORPORATION,, 632 So. 2d 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . salary in the round amount of $2,000 although his son had been previously receiving a fixed amount of $662.10 . . .

BROWN, By v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS,, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . 706.5 12.81 1981-82 82.3 666.5 12.35 1982-83 76.10 678.65 11.21 1983-84 78.15 635.0 12.31 1984-85 75.40 662.10 . . .

B. SINGER, v. SHANNON LUCHS COMPANY,, 670 F. Supp. 1024 (D.D.C. 1987)

. . . Munkasey 5.80 5.80 45 261.00 Subtotal June 17, 1982 to Sept. 1983 336.20 283.20 23,557.50 Totals 662.10 . . . 573.50 hours) represents 86.6% of the hours for which Shannon & Luchs has petitioned for reimbursements (662.10 . . .

C. MARDIS, v. BIG NANCE CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT a D. L. Jr. J. A. Jr. H. A. Jr., 578 F. Supp. 770 (N.D. Ala. 1983)

. . . . § 662.10(a) further defines a sponsor in the following language: “Watershed projects are sponsored . . .

FELDMAN, v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK,, 511 F.2d 460 (2d Cir. 1975)

. . . Vieques agreed to pay monthly rentals of $662.10 for five years, at the end of which period it had the . . .

FELDMAN, v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK,, 368 F. Supp. 1333 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)

. . . Under its terms Vieques undertook to make 60 monthly payments of $662.10, aggregating $39,726, and was . . . The trustee submits that FNCB received, between May 1, 1973 and August 18, 1970, 32 payments of $662.10 . . .

Co. v., 62 Cust. Ct. 282 (Cust. Ct. 1969)

. . . four pieces of what is described as “candy cutting & wrapping machine”, one unit, dutiable under item 662.10 . . . the red ink notations on the official papers that classification of the H-l machine was under item 662.10 . . .