Cases from cite.case.law:

PRESIDENTIAL LEASING, INC. v. KROUT,, 896 So. 2d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Arbitration Code, section 682.03, ... to have the court decide certain gateway issues and under section 672.302 . . .

HOLT v. O BRIEN IMPORTS OF FORT MYERS, INC. d b a, 862 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Arbitration Code, section 682.03, to have the court decide certain gateway issues and under section 672.302 . . .

DANA COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION v ESQUIRE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 34 Fla. Supp. 2d 14 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . The judge, within his discretion and in conformity to the Uniform Commercial Code Sec. 672.302(2), refused . . .

L. SELLERS H. v. FRANK GRIFFIN AMC JEEP, INC., 526 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . meaning of section 672.102 subject to the prohibition against unconscionable clauses found in section 672.302 . . . The trial court distinguished Capital Associates because section 672.302 is not limited by its terms . . . transactions in goods” within the definition in section 672,101 for the purpose of applying section 672.302 . . . Hudgens, 455 So.2d 651, section 672.302, prohibiting unconscionable clauses, is not expressly limited . . .

ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA SELF INSURERS FUND, v. H F SOD COMPANY, INC., 28 Fla. Supp. 2d 21 (Polk Cty. Ct. 1988)

. . . Section 672.302 allows a court to restrict any clause of a contract to avoid an unconscionable result . . . See 672.302, Fla. Stat., and Official Comment 1, citing Campbell Soup Co. v. . . .

MEETING MAKERS, INC. v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., 513 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . .-316(2), 672.302, Florida Statutes (1985). . . .

FOOD ASSOCIATES, INC. v. CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC. a, 491 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . In that case we specifically found section 672.302(2), Florida Statutes (1983), to apply to leases. . . . Section 672.302 provides: (1) If the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any clause of the . . .

GARRETT a k a v. C. JANIEWSKI,, 480 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . U.C.C. section 2-302 is codified in Florida as section 672.302. . . .

FOTOMAT CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, v. J. CHANDA,, 464 So. 2d 626 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See section 672.302, Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

BILLERA v. CUSTOM LAMINATING WINDOW PRODUCTS, INC., 11 Fla. Supp. 2d 120 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1985)

. . . writing did not amount to a “final expression” of the parties’ agreement within the meaning of Section 672.302 . . .

CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC. a v. Jo B. HUDGENS, a k a Jo d b a, 455 So. 2d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . opportunity to present evidence as to [the lease’s] commercial setting, purpose and effect .... ” § 672.302 . . . Section 672.302, Florida Statutes (1983), provides: (1) If the court as a matter of law finds the contract . . . This would permit invocation of section 672.302 to avoid oppression and unfair surprise. . . . See Uniform Commercial Code Comment, § 672.302, Fla. Stat.Ann. (1978); Fairfield Lease Corp. v. . . . Since section 672.302(2), Florida Statutes (1983), mandates that whenever unconscionability appears to . . .

CREDIT ALLIANCE CORPORATION, a v. WESTLAND MACHINE COMPANY, INC. a, 439 So. 2d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Relying on section 672.302, Florida Statutes (1981), Westland argues that such a contractual provision . . . There is no evidence of overreaching or unconscionability within the meaning of section 672.302. . . .

F. STEINHARDT v. RUDOLPH RUDOLPH v. F. STEINHARDT, 422 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 208 (1979); see also § 672.302, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

C. VARNER, v. B. L. LANIER FRUIT CO. INC., 370 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . The section on unconscionable contracts or clauses is Section 672.302(1), Florida Statutes (1975), which . . .

R. BENNETT, M. v. BEHRING CORPORATION, Al A. D. M. A. H. J. C. J. K. E. P. R., 466 F. Supp. 689 (S.D. Fla. 1979)

. . . By way of a footnote following the above quote, reference was made by the Court to Florida Statute 672.302 . . .

BUCKLEY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, v. HERBERT BUCHWALD,, 48 Fla. Supp. 14 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . By way of a footnote following the above dictum, reference was made by the court to §672.302, Fla. . . . Stat., a provision of the Uniform Commercial Code, which in part provides — 672.302 Unconscionable contract . . . Case, supra, indicates that the provisions of §672.302, Fla. . . . It appears that the provisions of §672.302 are applicable by analogy to condominium recreation leases . . .

B. FLEEMAN v. CASE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION v. A. JOHNSON PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. DEL PRADO CORPORATION,, 342 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 1976)

. . . See, for example, § 672.302, Fla.Stat.: “Unconscionable contract or clause.— “(1) If the court as a matter . . .

MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION, a v. HOWARD, 307 So. 2d 507 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Although not cited by the trial judge in his order, § 672.302, F.S.1971, adopting provision 2-302 of . . .