The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.315

672.315 Implied warranty; fitness for particular purpose.—Where the seller at the time of contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are required and that the buyer is relying on the seller’s skill or judgment to select or furnish suitable goods, there is unless excluded or modified under the next section an implied warranty that the goods shall be fit for such purpose.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254.

Note.—s. 2-315, U.C.C.; supersedes s. 578.13.

F.S. 672.315 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.315 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.315

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.315

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.315.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION,, 603 B.R. 525 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . . §§ 672.313, 672.314, 672.315 (identifying only sellers of goods as the makers of express or implied . . .

IN RE RUST- OLEUM RESTORE MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 155 F. Supp. 3d 772 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . . § 672.315; Ga. Code § 11-2-315; Idaho Code § 28-2-315; 810 ILCS 5/2-315; Ind. . . . Stat. § 672.315 cmt. 2; Ga. . . .

ARMADILLO DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISES, INC. v. HAI YUN MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS MANUFACTURE CO. LTD., 142 F. Supp. 3d 1245 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 672.315. . . . Stat. § 672.315. . . .

SANCHEZ- KNUTSON, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 52 F. Supp. 3d 1223 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . (Section 672.314, Florida Statutes); implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose (Section 672.315 . . . Section 672.315, Florida Statutes; (4) Facts in respect to the breach of the warranty; (5) Notice to . . .

M. COHEN, D. M. D. M. S. St. P. C. v. IMPLANT INNOVATIONS, INC. d b a, 259 F.R.D. 617 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . § 672.315, because the defendant had reason to know when it sold the Implant Product that it would . . .

BUSINESS RADIO, INC. v. RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION,, 373 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 672.315 (emphasis added). . . .

PREMIX- MARBLETITE MANUFACTURING CORP. v. SKW CHEMICALS, INC., 145 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (S.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Stat. 672.315 (implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose). . . .

COASTAL NATIVE PLANT SPECIALTIES, INC. v. ENGINEERED TEXTILE PRODUCTS, INC. v., 139 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (N.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . . § 672.315 (West 1993). . . .

DOUG CONNOR, INC. v. PROTO- GRIND, INC., 761 So. 2d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 672.315 (1997) provides as follows: Implied warranty; fitness for a particular purpose — Where . . .

THE OCEAN RITZ OF DAYTONA CONDOMINIUM, v. GGV ASSOCIATES, LTD,, 710 So. 2d 702 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 672.315, Florida Statutes. And this implied warranty runs to third-party beneficiaries. . . .

RASKIN v. COMMUNITY BLOOD CENTERS OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., 699 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . to completely insulate blood suppliers from any implied warranty actions under sections 672.314 and 672.315 . . .

GRAF, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 636 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . exclude or modify implied warranties of merchantability or implied warranties of fitness under section 672.315 . . .

WEISS, v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. a, 148 F.R.D. 289 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . Florida Statutes, section 672.315 (1991) states that: [w]here the seller at the time of contracting has . . .

EASTERN CEMENT, v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY,, 600 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See § 672.314-§ 672.315, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

INTERFASE MARKETING, INC. v. PIONEER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. KSH, 774 F. Supp. 1355 (M.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . misrepresentation; 2) breach of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose as provided by § 672.315 . . . KSH’s breach of an Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose pursuant to Florida Statutes § 672.315 . . .

INTERFASE MARKETING, INC. v. PIONEER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. KSH, 774 F. Supp. 1351 (M.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . misrepresentation; 2) breach of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose as provided by § 672.315 . . . Pioneer’s breach of an Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose pursuant to Florida Statutes § 672.315 . . .

J. LIGHT, v. WELDARC CO. INC., 569 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 672.315, Florida Statutes (1989) provides for the imposition of the implied warranty: Where the . . .

PINELLAS COUNTY v. INTERPACE,, 41 Fla. Supp. 2d 65 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . on the theory of breach of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose found in Section 672.315 . . .

CZARNECKI, v. ROLLER, Co., 726 F. Supp. 832 (S.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 672.315 (emphasis added). In Royal Typewriter Co. v. . . .

M. O CONNOR, v. KAWASAKI MOTORS CORPORATION, U. S. A. a a, 699 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . Instead, Plaintiff contends that §§ 672.314 and 672.315 of the Florida Statutes, which are part of Florida . . .

RYAN, v. ATLANTIC FERTILIZER CHEMICAL COMPANY,, 515 So. 2d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 672.315, Florida Statutes, defines a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose: Where the . . . Section 672.315, Florida Statutes. . . .

In BOB RIGBY, INC. BOB RIGBY, INC. v. EAGLE CRUSHER, INC., 62 B.R. 900 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . . § 672.315. . . .

MESSINGER v. FRIEDMAN, 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 127 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1985)

. . . governed by the Code, then Defendant would be subject to the warranty provisions of Sections 672.313-672.315 . . .

L. C. CRAWFORD, v. GOLD KIST, INC. a, 614 F. Supp. 682 (M.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . Count II is an action for implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, pursuant to Section 672.315 . . . An action for breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is defined by Section 672.315 . . .

R. A. JONES SONS, INC. a v. HOLMAN, A. Jr. E. a a FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a v. R. A. JONES SONS, INC. a, 470 So. 2d 60 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . (s. 672.316) other implied warranties may arise from course of dealing or usage of trade.” .Section 672.315 . . .

CEDARS OF LEBANON HOSPITAL CORP. v. EUROPEAN X- RAY DISTRIBUTORS OF AMERICA, INC. A. B., 444 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The courts in both Miller and Rehurek based their decisions on the language of sections 672.315 and 672.316 . . . express warranty and an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose under sections 672.313 and 672.315 . . . It is the direct contacts which create the express and implied warranties under sections 672.313 and 672.315 . . .

ROYAL TYPEWRITER COMPANY, A DIVISION OF LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. a v. XEROGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CORPORATION, a, 719 F.2d 1092 (11th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 672.315; see Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. Lorraine Corp., 633 F.2d at 46. . . . leasing, as opposed to selling, copiers is not a “particular purpose” to which the protections of § 672.315 . . .

BEEDE ELEGTRICAL INSTRUMENT COMPANY, v. K. E. S. INC. a, 433 So. 2d 59 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Bass, 159 So.2d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Section 672.315 Florida Statutes (1977). . . .

TAYLOR J. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. a Co. a, 555 F. Supp. 59 (M.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . subject motorcycle were “seller’s warranties” falling squarely within the ambit of § 672.314 and § 672.315 . . .

FIRST NEW ENGLAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION, f u b o v. R. WOFFARD,, 421 So. 2d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Sec. 672.315, Fla.Stat. . . . Sec. 672.315. . . .

FUQUAY, v. REVELS MOTORS, INC., 389 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . (emphasis ours) Sections 672.314 and 672.315, Florida Statutes, provide for implied warranties of merchantability . . .

HI NEIGHBOR ENTERPRISES, INC. a E. A. H. v. BURROUGHS CORPORATION, a, 492 F. Supp. 823 (N.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . . § 672.315, Fla.Stat. (1977) . . . .

ESTATE C. HARPER H. H. E. D. v. ORLANDO FUNERAL HOME, INC. d b a, 366 So. 2d 126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . (See F.S. 672.314; F.S. 672.315; F.S. 672.714 and F.S. 672.715). . . .

F. LEE, M. Jr. v. C P SERVICE CORPORATION, 363 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . the Uniform Commercial Code relating to implied warranty relied on by appellant [Sections 672.314 and 672.315 . . .

DUNHAM- BUSH, INC. v. THERMO- AIR SERVICE, INC., 351 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . .-314, Florida Statutes [1975]); implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose (Section 672.315 . . . Section 672.315, Florida Statutes (1975); 4) Facts in respect to the breach of the warranty; 5) Notice . . .

JOHN H. PHIPPS BROADCASTING STATIONS, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CO., 45 Fla. Supp. 82 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1976)

. . . contended that there is also a breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose under Section 672.315 . . .

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, v. MILLER,, 310 So. 2d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Basically, we find that § 672.315, Fla. . . .

WASH WELL, INC. a d b a v. MOREJON,, 294 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 672.315, F.S.A. . . .

GABLE, v. SILVER, 258 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . Ch. 672.314, F.S.1969, F.S.A. and Ch. 672.315, F.S.1969, F.S.A. 672.314 Implied warranty: merchantability . . .