Cases from cite.case.law:

LYNCH AUSTIN REALTY, INC. v. A. ENGLER, W. A., 647 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . We look to section 672.326, Florida Statutes (1991), for guidance in resolving this issue under the peculiar . . . be the case here, are subject to the claims of a buyer’s creditor while in the buyer’s possession. § 672.326 . . . order to prevail over a creditor’s claim, however, the supplier of the goods must comply with section 672.326 . . . Thus, “[section 672.326(3), Florida Statutes, was enacted for the purpose of protecting creditors of . . . of compliance "with the filing provisions of the chapter on secured transactions (chapter 679).” § 672.326 . . .

In HASTINGS MARINE CORPORATION, d b a, 99 B.R. 98 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . creditors of the so-called consignee unless the person making delivery complies with the provisions of § 672.326 . . . interest evidenced by a sign, or with the alternative available to a consignor under subclause (a) of § 672.326 . . . consideration whether or not Magic Tilt has established a compliance with the criteria set forth in either § 672.326 . . .

COPY SERVICE, INC. a v. FLORIDA COPY CORPORATION, a, 527 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Allied Marine, 513 So.2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); §§ 672.326-.327, Fla.Stat. (1985); it argues that since . . .

MAHLER, v. ALLIED MARINE, P., 513 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . right to the use of the goods pending approval, and which is described as a “sale on approval,” see §§ 672.326 . . .

In DENMARK COMPANY, INC. L. BAKST, v. WHEELER OIL COMPANY, INC., 73 B.R. 325 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1987)

. . . . § 672.326) is controlling in this instance. . . .

In HOLYWELL CORP. s BANK OF NEW YORK, v. OLYMPIA YORK FLORIDA EQUITY CORP. O Y B., 51 B.R. 56 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . security interest, but a consignment is in any event subject to the provisions on consignment sales (s.672.326 . . .

In UNITED PRECIOUS METALS, INC. JOHNSON MATTHEY LTD. v. UNITED PRECIOUS METALS, INC., 39 B.R. 14 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . of the identifiable silver bars to the debtor was not a consignment sale under the provisions of § 672.326 . . .

GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORPORATION, a v. WALTER E. HELLER COMPANY SOUTHEAST, INC. a, 440 So. 2d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . a bankrupt entity was a transaction encompassed within the Florida Uniform Commercial Code, Section 672.326 . . . The legislative history with respect to Section 672.326(3), Florida Statutes, indicates that a consignee . . . Official Comment 2, Section 672.326, Florida Statutes. . . . Section 672.326(3), Florida Statutes, was enacted for the purpose of protecting the creditors of a merchant . . . Bill Amos was to facilitate sales transactions and was thus “for sale” within the meaning of Section 672.326 . . .

In NEW YORK DIAMOND AND JEWELRY EXCHANGE, INC. YUGORSKY, v. NEW YORK DIAMOND AND JEWELRY EXCHANGE, INC., 26 B.R. 32 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . Sec. 672.326, 679.802 and 679.114. 4. . . . See. 672.326(3), 679.114; In re Florida Consumer’s Furniture Warehouse, 9 B.R. 7 (S.D.Fla.1981); In re . . .

In JAM FINE FURNITURE, INC. d b a D. SEIDLE, v. TASHMAN,, 19 B.R. 578 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . State to perfect the security interest and inventory, nor was the claimed lien perfected under FSA 672.326 . . .

In FLORIDA CONSUMER S FURNITURE WAREHOUSE, INC. E. GENNET, v. ORIENTAL RUG AGENCY, INC. a, 9 B.R. 7 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1981)

. . . As defined by § 2-326 of the U.C.C., § 672.326(2) and (3), Florida Statutes, goods delivered primarily . . .

CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI v. MOTIF ART GALLERIES,, 49 Fla. Supp. 104 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1979)

. . . The bank’s contention in this regard is predicated on Florida Statute 672.326 (1977) [§2-326 Uniform . . . Commercial Code] which provides — 672.326 Sale on approval and sale or return; consignment sales and . . . Ltd. and Editions, Inc. have attempted to except their transactions with Motif from the operation of §672.326 . . . Throughout these proceedings, the court has not been unmindful of the potentially harsh consequences of Sec. 672.326 . . . precision, the meaning of “generally known” and “substantially engaged” as those terms are used in §672.326 . . .

DREWRY v. THOMPSON DOOR COMPANY,, 47 Fla. Supp. 177 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . warehouse by the sheriff of Broward County, having perfected same in accordance with the requirements of §672.326 . . .