Cases from cite.case.law:

MEDINA, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 40 So. 3d 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 681.101, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

DeMAYO, v. CHAMES P. A., 934 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Stat. (1973)(es-tablishing the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act); § 681.101, Fla. . . .

GELINAS, v. FOREST RIVER, INC., 931 So. 2d 970 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .” § 681.101, Fla. Stat. Gelinas also relies on two cases from this Court to support his argument. . . .

KING, v. KING MOTOR COMPANY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a a a, 780 So. 2d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 681.101, Fla.Stat. (2000). . . . Board as part of a statutory procedure to secure the replacement/refund remedy described in sections 681.101 . . .

HOLZHAUER- MOSHER, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 772 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . In the legislative intent of the Lemon Law, set forth in section 681.101, Florida Statutes (1997), “the . . . Section 681.101 further provides that it is “the intent of the Legislature to provide the statutory procedures . . . or expand the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.” § 681.101 . . . or expand the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.” § 681.101 . . .

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, v. PITSIRELOS,, 721 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1998)

. . . The legislative intent of the Lemon Law is set forth in section 681.101, Florida Statutes (1989): The . . .

BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. SINGH,, 664 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . The statement of legislative intent found in section 681.101 supports this view as it acknowledges the . . .

RESULTS REAL ESTATE, INC. v. LAZY DAYS R. V. CENTER, INC. a a, 505 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . The intent of the legislature in passing section 681.101, Florida Statutes (1985), was expressed in the . . . following manner: 681.101 Legislative intent. — The Legislature recognizes that a motor vehicle is a . . .