Cases from cite.case.law:

T. SHANNON, T. J. T. R. LLC, a v. H R HYDRO- PULL, INC. d b a H R a, 230 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 713.08(5), Fla. Stat, (2008). . . .

BEST DRYWALL SERVICES, INC. R. v. BLASZCZYK, 207 So.3d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 713.08(5), Fla. . . . Best had offered no evidence to support its allegation that the lien was timely filed under section 713.08 . . . testified that the work was completed on several dates outside the ninety-day filing window of section 713.08 . . .

VILLAGE AT DOLPHIN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC, v. CONSTRUCTION SERVICE SOLUTIONS, LLC,, 143 So. 3d 942 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 713.08, 713.21, Fla. Stat. (2009).” See also, McDaniel v. . . .

PREMIER FINISHES, INC. v. MAGGIRIAS,, 130 So. 3d 238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 713.08(4)(b) permits the amendment of a claim of lien “during the period allowed for recording . . . Since Premier Finishes is now forever barred from amending the claim of lien, we must address section 713.08 . . . be recorded “later than 90 days after the final furnishing of the labor or services or materials.” § 713.08 . . . See generally § 713.08(1)-(3). . . .

STOCK BUILDING SUPPLY OF FLORIDA, INC. d b a K A v. SOARES DA COSTA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC,, 76 So. 3d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .’ § 713.08(4)(a).”); see also Stunkel v. . . .

SAM RODGERS PROPERTIES, INC. v. CHMURA,, 61 So. 3d 432 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Under section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes (2006), a claim of lien must be recorded no later than ninety . . . enforcement of such lien as against one who has not been adversely affected by such omission or error.” § 713.08 . . .

ROYAL PALM COLLECTION, INC. v. B. LEWIS, 36 So. 3d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See §§ 713.08, 713.21, Fla. Stat. (2009); Mills v. Robert W. . . .

ZUPNIK HAVERLAND, L. L. C. v. CURRENT BUILDERS OF FLORIDA, INC., 7 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 713.08, Florida Statutes, provides that a claim of lien "may be recorded at any time during the . . .

J. TRYTEK, v. GALE INDUSTRIES, INC., 3 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 2009)

. . . mandates “prevailing party” attorneys’ fees disregards the fact that a claim of lien under section 713.08 . . . labor, services or materials furnished,” and the “amount unpaid” be part of the “claim of lien.” §§ 713.08 . . . (l)(c),(g), 713.08(3), Fla. . . .

J. S. L. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a L. v. LEVY, 994 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 713.08(5) of the Florida Statutes provides that a “claim of lien may be recorded at any time . . .

TRINTEC CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. COUNTRYSIDE VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 992 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . provision regarding mechanic’s liens, see section 718.121, Florida Statutes (2006), versus section 713.08 . . . Sections 713.08(l)(d) and (e) specify that a recorded claim of lien “shall” state a description of the . . . Section 713.08(4)(a) provides that an omission or error within a claim of lien “shall not, within the . . . Section 713.08(4)(b) permits the amendment of a lien “during the period allowed for recording such claim . . . Section 713.08(5) allowed 90 days from the date Trintec’s “final furnishing of the labor or services . . .

LANGLEY, v. KNOWLES, 958 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . §§ 713.05, 713.08, Fla. Stat. (2004). . § 713.31, Fla. Stat. (2004). . § 713.29, Fla. . . .

DELTA FIRE SPRINKLERS, INC. v. ONEBEACON INSURANCE COMPANY,, 937 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Thus, for example, section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes, requires a claim of lien to be recorded at any . . . test to be applied in determining whether particular work constitutes a final furnishing under section 713.08 . . .

In JENNERWEIN,, 309 B.R. 385 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . The applicable statute is Section 713.08(5) of the Florida Statutes which provides: The claim of lien . . . final furnishing” of labor, services, or materials by a pool contractor under Florida Statute Section 713.08 . . . Clearly, under Florida Statute Section 713.08(5), work performed “in fulfillment of a contract ... extends . . .

PIERSON D. CONSTRUCTION, INC. a v. YUDELL, 863 So. 2d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . After a claim of lien against an owner is recorded pursuant to section 713.08, Florida Statutes (2000 . . .

In STARLIGHT HOMES, INC. E. Jr. v., 297 B.R. 856 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . on the public records against the Property within the 90 days required by Florida Statutes Section 713.08 . . . Stat. § 713.08(5), Claim of Lien, prescribes: The claim of lien may be recorded at any time during the . . . lien created by the Florida legislature clearly depends on the requirement of Florida Statute Section 713.08 . . . Stat. § 713.08(5), is (1) whether the work was done in good faith, (2) within a reasonable time, (3) . . .

MICHNAL, v. PALM COAST DEVELOPMENT, INC., 842 So. 2d 927 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 713.08(5), Fla. . . . The court also found the lien was timely filed within the meaning of s. 713.08(5). . . . Palm Coast’s post-termination retrieval of its equipment, constituted “final furnishings” under s. 713.08 . . . See § 713.08(5), Fla. Stat. (1997); Stunkel v. . . . test to be applied in determining whether particular work constitutes a “final furnishing” under s. 713.08 . . .

BELL v. RENAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,, 811 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Contractor under the terms of said agreement between Owner and Contractor and in compliance with Chapter 713.08 . . .

In L. MADDEN a k a, 274 B.R. 551 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Pursuant to § 713.08, Florida Statutes, White Sands recorded its claim of lien against the subject property . . .

S. BARLOW L. v. MOLLOY,, 773 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . of the Barlows’ residence, Molloy ceased construction and filed a claim of lien pursuant to section 713.08 . . . Stat. § 713.08(5). . . . Section 713.08(4)(b) allows a claim of lien to be amended at any time during the 90-day period provided . . .

HUNZINGER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a a v. QUARLES BRADY, 735 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . .” § 713.08(5), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

E. JOHNSON v. AQUA POOL CO. INC., 725 So. 2d 458 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . adverse effect,” has its genesis in the statutory interplay between section 713.06(2)(a) and section 713.08 . . . Section 713.08(4)(a) provides: The omission of any of the foregoing details or errors in such claim of . . .

ORLANDO DINNER ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. ELECTRIC SYSTEMS, INC., 722 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See section 713.08(1) and (5), Florida Statutes. . . .

FLORIDA WOOD SERVICES, INC. a v. OSPREY LINKS JOINT VENTURE,, 720 So. 2d 591 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . FWS then recorded its claim of Ken for $467,123.48 as aKowed by Section 713.08, Florida Statutes (1995 . . . Landscaping Design, Inc., 660 So.2d 623 (Fla.1995) (court construed claim of lien statute, section 713.08 . . .

I. ZALAY A. v. ACE CABINETS OF CLEARWATER, INC. USA, 700 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 713.08(5), Fla. Stat. (1993). Olympia Tile (USA), Inc. . . .

HERPEL, INC. v. STRAUB CAPITAL CORP. a a a Co. a, 682 So. 2d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . recorded within 90 days of the final furnishing of materials to the job site as required by section 713.08 . . . Section 713.08(5) provides in pertinent part that: The claim of lien may be recorded at any time during . . . Id. § 713.08(5). . . . section 255.05(2) and the meaning of “complete delivery ” of rental equipment, rather than section 713.08 . . . of Lien within 90 days of the final furnishing of materials to the job site as required by section 713.08 . . .

E. STUNKEL, v. GAZEBO LANDSCAPING DESIGN, INC., 660 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 1995)

. . . Section 713.08(3) requires that a claim of lien include an attestation by a notary. . . . Section 713.08(4)(a), states: The omission of any of the foregoing details or errors in such claim of . . .

WATER SEWER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. a v. DULANEY, 653 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 713.08(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). . . . . §§ 713.08(4)(a), 713.10, 713.12, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

HOEPNER ASSOCIATES, INC. v. STEWART GILMAN COMPANY, INC., 648 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . See § 713.08(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . .

In CJW LIMITED, INC. W. GRANT, CJW v. I. B. DAVIS A., 172 B.R. 675 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . . § 713.08(2). . . . Fla.Stat. 713.08(4)(a); In re Twelve Oaks, Ltd., 59 B.R. 736 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1986). . . . In addition to allowing perfection when the owner’s name is incorrect, Section 713.08(4)(a) apphes to . . .

STRESSCON, v. MADIEDO,, 581 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1991)

. . . East Coast Supply Corp., 495 So.2d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (addressing section 713.08(4)(a), Florida . . .

ROBERT M. SWEDROE, ARCHITECT PLANNERS, A. I. A. P. A. v. FIRST AMERICAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION,, 565 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . The time for recording such claim of lien is set forth in section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes, which . . .

STRESSCON, a v. MADIEDO, 561 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . trial court’s construction of subsection 713.16(2) is at odds with the policy stated in subsection 713.08 . . .

R L CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. W. CULLEN,, 557 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 713.08 provides that [f]or the purpose of perfecting his lien under part I, every lienor, including . . . This statute goes on to specify the contents required in the claim of lien and, in section 713.08(5), . . . 713.05 he is not required to file his claim of lien within the 90 day period provided for in section 713.08 . . . claim of lien of lienors in privity must be filed within the 90 day period provided for in section 713.08 . . . complying with other statutory requirements for perfecting his lien including the requirements of section 713.08 . . .

CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE LATTER DAY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST s v. SEYMOUR ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. INC., 558 So. 2d 88 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 713.08, Florida Statutes (1985). . . . .

D. McCOWN d b a v. PIERCE CONSTRUCTION, INC., 552 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . This court in Tully held that the predecessor provision to section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes (1987) . . . 932, 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986): While the contents of a claim of lien are specified by statute, section 713.08 . . . prevent enforcement of the lien against one unless he is adversely affected by the error or omission. § 713.08 . . .

HARVESTERS GROUP, INC. v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION,, 527 So. 2d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . within ninety days of the failure to receive any payment due from delivery date for any materials); § 713.08 . . . the effect of repairs on the ninety-day notice required by Florida’s Mechanics' Lien Statute, section 713.08 . . . Viking Builders, 391 So.2d at 303 (notice of lien, required by section 713.08(5) to be recorded not later . . .

JOHNSON BAILEY ARCHITECTS, P. C. v. SOUTHEAST BRAKE CORPORATION,, 517 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . out of which the claim arose, it did not include a description of the property as required under § 713.08 . . . We cannot accept this argument in light of the clear language of 713.08(4)(a) that an omission will not . . .

SUNAIR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a v. W. GAY, 509 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . , Sunair moved for a directed verdict on the ground that Renovations failed to comply with sections 713.08 . . . Section 713.08(5) provides in relevant part: The claim of lien may be recorded at any time during the . . . Therefore, we conclude that there was compliance with the filing requirements of section 713.08(5). . . .

RUTENBERG- SARASOTA, LTD. v. EISNER,, 509 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . recorded and served a claim of lien against the Fairway Woods property in accordance with sections 713.08 . . .

W. McCURRY, Jr. v. M. EPPOLITO M., 506 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes. . . . .

PLAZA BUILDERS, INC. v. M. REGIS, M., 502 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 713.08(5) provides that: The claim of lien may be recorded at any time during the progress of . . .

ROYAL AMBASSADOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. EAST COAST SUPPLY CORP. a, 495 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . While the contents of a claim of lien are specified by statute, section 713.08, Florida Statutes (1981 . . . prevent enforcement of the lien against one unless he is adversely affected by the error or omission. § 713.08 . . .

In CONTINENTAL COUNTRY CLUB, INC., 64 B.R. 177 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . . § 713.08(5). . . . Section 713.08(5) of the Florida Statutes states: The validity of the lien and the right to record a . . . F.S.A. § 713.08(5). . . . Claimants argue that Florida Statute § 713.08(5) is the “generally applicable law” which permit them . . . The language in Florida Statute § 713.08 which upholds the validity of a lien notwithstanding the bankruptcy . . .

HARDRIVES COMPANY St. v. TRI- COUNTY CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC., 489 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Finally, I would invoke the harmless error section of the mechanics lien statute, section 713.08(4)(a . . .

J. R. FENTON, INC. v. GALLERY INC. d b a H., 488 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . the August 10 amended claim of lien was invalid because it was not filed in accordance with section 713.08 . . . The claim of lien form filed by appellant substantially complied with the form contained in section 713.08 . . . Section 713.08(4)(a) provides: “The omission of any of the ... details or errors in such claim of lien . . .

In TWELVE OAKS, LTD. a TWELVE OAKS, LTD. a v. FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK, a St. s a k a St. s Co. a s a a a d b a s Co. a d b a a Co. a s a s a N. G. a k a G. C. J. M. a, 59 B.R. 736 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . . § 713.08(1). A. . . . Claim of Lien Only “substantial” compliance with the requirements in Florida Statute § 713.08 is required . . . F.S.A. § 713.08(4)(a). See also George J. Motz Construction Corp. v. Coral Pines, Inc., supra. . . . This liberal reading of Florida Statute § 713.08 reasonably and fairly carries out the remedial intent . . . F.S.A. § 713.08(5). Barker recorded its claim of lien on June 4, 1985. . . .

INLAND MATERIALS, INC. a v. SUPERIOR AIRCRAFT HANGARS, INC. a, 464 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . (mechanic’s liens), and especially § 713.08(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (claim of lien). . . . .

In ADVANCED CONTRACTORS, R. COOLEY, v. GENERAL ELEVATOR CORP., 44 B.R. 239 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . .” § 713.08(5) Fla.Stat. . . .

K. HIERS, B. v. THOMAS, Jr., 458 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes (1983), provides that a claim of lien may be recorded at any time . . . the claim of lien within ninety days of completion of the project, in full compliance with section 713.08 . . .

SYMONS CORPORATION, v. TARTAN- LAVERS DELRAY BEACH, INC. d b a, 456 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 713.08, Florida Statutes, in subsection (4)(a) specifically states that: The omission of any . . .

WOLFORD W. v. W. SAPP,, 448 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes (1979) provides, inter alia, that a claim of lien may be recorded . . .

In WYNNE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, W. F. Co. WYNNE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, W. F. Co. v. SUBCONTRACTORS, SU- BSUBCONTRACTORS, LABORERS, MATERIALMEN AND PROFESSIONALS ON PROJECTS OF W. F. WYNNE CO. INC., 40 B.R. 311 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . notice of claim in substantially the same form required for claims of lien under Florida Statutes § 713.08 . . .

HOBBS CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF SYNOD OF FLORIDA, 440 So. 2d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Hobbs argues that section 713.08(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (1981), would allow it to claim the “value” of its . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. ATLANTIC SHORES, INC., 436 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . General Electric first filed a claim of lien (§ 713.08, Fla.Stat. (1981)) and notice to owner (§ 713.06 . . .

BRACCO, v. CARDOZO G., 434 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . subsequent notices to owner filed pursuant to section 713.06(2) and claims of lien filed under section 713.08 . . .

JOSEPH BUCHECK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a v. W. E. MUSIC, a a, 420 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes (1981), states that recordation of a claim of lien constitutes constructive . . .

ACADIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Co. v. RINKER MATERIALS CORPORATION, a, 419 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . last furnishing of materials on open account, the defendants contend that the action is barred by Sec. 713.08 . . . paid for and satisfied, the only lien asserted, and thus the pertinent “final furnishing” under See. 713.08 . . . payment for those materials which, as we have already seen, makes no difference in the application of 713.08 . . .

In GUARDIAN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, f k a GUARDIAN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN OF LAKE WORTH, a, 23 B.R. 126 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . commencing work pursuant to Florida Statutes, § 713.06(2)(a), and further complied with Florida Statutes, § 713.08 . . .

E. V. CONSTRUCTION CO. v. O. NEWMAN J., 418 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . On January 30, 1979, within the 90-day period after completion provided by Sec. 713.08(5), Fla.Stat. . . .

GESCO, INC. N. A. a a v. EDWARD L. NEZELEK, INC. EDWARD L. NEZELEK, INC. v. GESCO, INC. N. A. a a, 414 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . It should be noted that Section 713.08, Florida Statutes, provides for a lien in the amount remaining . . .

BLINN d b a v. R. DUMAS T., 408 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 713.08(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1980), specifically provides that the omission of details or . . .

VIKING BUILDERS, INC. v. E. FELICES G., 391 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes (1979), provides in part: The claim of lien may be recorded at any . . .

RINGLING BROS. BARNUM BAILEY COMBINED SHOWS, INC. v. HART d b a s, A. d b a, 390 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Although Anderson’s lien was not in the form prescribed in Section 713.08(3), there is no showing that . . . The trial court therefore acted within its discretion in enforcing Anderson’s lien. § 713.08(4)(a), Fla.Stat . . . to have prejudiced appellant; thus, the trial court was correct in not finding his claim voidable. § 713.08 . . .

C. ARONSON v. KEATING d b a, 386 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Thus, the Aronsons contended that the claim of lien was not filed timely as required by Section 713.08 . . . Section 713.08(5) provides in pertinent part: The claim of lien may be recorded at any time during the . . .

GERGORA v. R. L. LAPP FORMING, INC. Co., 619 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . Section 713.08(5) of the Florida Statutes provides that a lien may be recorded at any time within “ninety . . .

BEAVER INDUSTRIES, INC. a v. WESTLAKE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 382 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether the recording of a Claim of Lien under Section 713.08 . . . The recording of a claim of lien pursuant to Section 713.08, Florida Statutes is a statutory prerequisite . . .

CLIMATROL CORPORATION, a v. KENT, 370 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Section 713.06(2), Florida Statutes (1977), “Notice to Owner”, or within the 90-day period of Section 713.08 . . .

B. KENNELLY, v. MARLER PROPERTIES OF DEERFIELD, INC. a, 365 So. 2d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . See Section 713.08, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

E. E. DEAN SNAVELY, INC. v. SULLIVAN, 360 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Sullivan filed a claim of lien pursuant to Section 713.08, Florida Statutes (1977), on March 7, 1975. . . . On April 9, 1975, Moody filed his claim of lien in accordance with Section 713.08, but did not file suit . . . The relief which Moody sought under Section 713.23 was entirely separate from that afforded him by 713.08 . . . There is no requirement, as in 713.08, that the lienor otherwise perfect his lien by bringing suit within . . .

F. MORGAN v. GOODWIN,, 355 So. 2d 217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Appellee Goodwin filed a claim of mechanic’s lien against the owners pursuant to Section 713.08, Florida . . .

KONSLER STEEL COMPANY, v. PARTIN,, 356 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 1978)

. . . The claim was filed within 90 days from the final furnishing of material as is required by Section 713.08 . . .

CLEVELAND TRUST COMPANY, a v. OUSLEY SOD COMPANY, a ACME, 351 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . A lien is perfected by recording a claim of lien in the manner and form set forth in Section 713.08, . . .

CROSS STATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a a a v. INDEPCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. a, 346 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . STATUTE INVOLVED Section 713.08(5), Florida Statutes (1971), provides in pertinent part: “The claim of . . . , which was filed on 9 February, was not filed within the 90-day period of time mandated by Section 713.08 . . . work on 4 or 9 November is not the furnishing of labor or services within the intendment of Section 713.08 . . .

MID- STATE CONTRACTORS, INC. v. HALO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 342 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . The claim of lien followed the form set out in Section 713.08(3), but stated the amount remaining unpaid . . . First, Section 713.08(l)(g) provides in part, “ . . . . . . Following that directory language Section 713.08(3) sets forth a form which contains all the required . . . The conclusion to be drawn from these quoted portions of Section 713.08 is that technical fulfillment . . . In fact, such omissions or errors may, according to Section 713.08(4)(a) be fatal to the maintenance . . .

A. FINN, v. SCHNEIDER- RICHTER ASSOCIATES P. A. a A., 343 So. 2d 646 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . may the lienor by his own oral testimony prove his compliance with the requirement of Florida Statute 713.08 . . .

HAWAIIAN INN OF DAYTONA BEACH, INC. v. H. DUNN d b a, 342 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . days plus one year from completing delivery to claim a lien and sue for foreclosure under Sections 713.08 . . .

PAGE HEATING COOLING, INC. a v. GOLDMAR HOMES, INC., 338 So. 2d 265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . On April 14, 1975, appellant filed a claim of lien pursuant to F.S. 713.08. Appellees, Mr. and Mrs. . . . lien was recorded within 90 days after the final furnishing of labor and materials as required by F.S. 713.08 . . .

PARTIN, v. KONSLER STEEL COMPANY,, 336 So. 2d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . property for $6,415.00, which was within the ninety day period as required under Florida Statute § 713.08 . . . required by F.S. § 713.06(2)(a), provided appellee had complied with the ninety day requirement of F.S. § 713.08 . . .

HEY KILEY MAN, INC. v. AZALEA GARDENS APARTMENTS, 333 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . to § 713.06(2), F.S.1973, and timely recorded a claim of lien in the amount of $880.40 pursuant to § 713.08 . . .

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. BENNETT G. d b a B. J. E., 329 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . The amended complaint failed to allege service of the claim of lien as required by Florida Statute 713.08 . . .

W. R. SCOTT, d b a v. PREMIUM DEVELOPMENT, INC., 328 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . The claim of lien was recorded in accordance with § 713.08. . . .

BOWEN d b a v. AMERICAN ARLINGTON BANK, a, 325 So. 2d 31 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . days after the final furnishing of the labor or services or materials by the lienor as the statute (§ 713.08 . . .

RAPIDEK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SUMMIT INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK,, 318 So. 2d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . 30, 1974, and thus was beyond the 90 day period allowed for the recording of such claim of lien by § 713.08 . . . Section 713.08 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. which lists eight matters that are to be stated in a claim of lien ( . . . lien upon the enforcibility of the lien, we there pointed out that in view of subsection (4) (a) of § 713.08 . . .

BOOTH, v. JOE LOMBARDI, INC., 309 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . The trial court held that appellant substantially complied with § 713.08, F.S. but that he was not in . . .

RUOCCO, v. P. BRINKER,, 380 F. Supp. 432 (S.D. Fla. 1974)

. . . . § 713.08(5), F.S.A. . F.S. § 713.08, F.S.A. . . . . F.S. § 713.08(2), F.S.A. . . . .

JACK STILSON CO. a v. CALOOSA BAYVIEW CORPORATION, a, 278 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Section 713.08(4) (b), F.S.A., expressly so provides. . . . To be efficacious F.S., Section 713.08(4)(b), F.S.A., authorizes an amended claim of lien to operate . . . As the majority has it, Section 713.22(2) supervenes Section 713.08(4) (b) and it will avail a lienor . . . Section 713.08(4) (b), F.S.A., for preparing and filing corrective claims of lien and amended suits thereon . . .

ADOBE BRICK AND SUPPLY COMPANY, v. CENTEX- WINSTON CORPORATION L. a, 270 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . .] ; and the timely filing of a claim of lien [provided for in § 713.08 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.]; with a copy . . . of a showing that the owner was adversely affected by the error, in view of subsection (4) (a) of § 713.08 . . . owner was adversely affected became a material issue in the case, in view of subsection (4) (a) of § 713.08 . . . In so holding we have not overlooked the fact that subparagraph (4) (a) of § 713.08 includes the clause . . .

JACK STILSON CO. a v. CALOOSA BAYVIEW CORPORATION, a, 265 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 713.08(5), F.S.1969, F.S.A. . § 713.08(4) (b), F.S.1969, F.S.A. . § 713.22(2), F.S.1969, F.S.A. . . . Although Section 713.08(4) (b) provides for the amendment of a claim of lien, we believe that such an . . .

W. SHARPE, v. HERMAN A. THOMAS, INC., 250 So. 2d 330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Sub-paragraph 5 of § 713.08 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., relating to claims of lien, provides: “The claim of lien . . .

YELL- FOR- PENNELL, INC. a v. JOAB, INC. a, 243 So. 2d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . See § 713.08(3) and (4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; George J. Motz Construction Corp. v. . . .

GEORGE J. MOTZ CONSTRUCTION CORP. v. CORAL PINES, INC., 232 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . Chapter 713, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. known as the Mechanics’ Lien Law, requires pursuant to § 713.08 . . . Section (4) (a) of F.S. 713.08, F.S.A., states that any omission in the foregoing details or errors in . . . Section 713.08(4) (a), F.S.A., makes it clear that substantial compliance with the requirements as to . . . Motz was in substantial compliance with F.S. § 713.08, F.S.A., sufficient to assert a cause of action . . .

PROFFETT v. VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE,, 71 Ohio Law Abs. 195 (N.D. Ohio 1953)

. . . Sec. 4366-9 GC (§713.08 R. . . . contains provisions identical with or similar to those to be found in §§4366-8, 4366-9 GC (§§713.07, 713.08 . . .