Cases from cite.case.law:

PIPELINE CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. TRANSITION HOUSE, INC. a, 257 So. 3d 606 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 713.22(2), Fla. Stat. . . . lien would have to be time-barred as of January 2, 2017, by the 60-day limitation set out in section 713.22 . . .

RABIL v. SEASIDE BUILDERS, LLC,, 226 So. 3d 935 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . denying their motion and imposing notice on the contractor’s counsel, which is not required by section 713.22 . . . They argued that under sections 713.22 and 713.24, Florida Statutes, the property was released from the . . . See § 713.22(2). . . . But, the contractor argues that the statutory notice provision of section 713.22(2) violates due process . . .

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, a v. J B MOTEL CORP. N. A. N. A. F. S. B. f k a, 213 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 713.22 is also titled “Duration of Lien” and, in pertinent part, states: A lien provided by this . . . within that time an action to enforce the lien is commenced in a court of competent jurisdiction. § 713.22 . . .

HILLER, v. PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., 189 So. 3d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Hiller then filed a notice of contest under section 713.22(2), shortening the time within which Phoenix . . . action against the surety or the transfer bond would extinguish automatically by operation of section 713.22 . . . to enforce a lien-is commenced in a court of competent jurisdiction within the time specified in s. 713.22 . . . his or her lien within 60 days after service of such notice shall be extinguished automatically.” § 713.22 . . . 43, 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976) (“A fundamental purpose of the limitation periods established by F.S. s. 713.22 . . .

M. SNELL v. MOTT S CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC., 141 So. 3d 605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The Snells then filed a notice of contest of hen pursuant to section 713.22(2), Florida Statutes (2010 . . . See § 713.22(1) (emphasis added). . . . As indicated previously, section 713.22(1) requires that the action to enforce the lien be filed in a . . . Importantly, however, section 713.29, which we must read in tandem with section 713.22, distinguishes . . . The Snells shortened this prescribed period to sixty days pursuant to section 713.22(2). . . . .

COOL GUYS, LLC d b a v. JOMAR PROPERTIES, LLC,, 84 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . follows: “If a proceeding to enforce a transferred lien is not commenced within the time prescribed in s. 713.22 . . . language “clearly intends that any future proceedings be commenced within the year set forth in s. 713.22 . . . to enforce a lien is commenced in a court of competent jurisdiction within the time specified in s. 713.22 . . .

AULET, v. M. CASTRO f k a M., 44 So. 3d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Yudell, 863 So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (holding that sixty-day limit in section 713.22(2) to institute . . .

W. W. PLASTERING, INCORPORATED, a v. CHISM CONSTRUCTION INC. a R. L. J. D., 867 So. 2d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . initiated an action against the security bond in a court of competent jurisdiction as required by sections 713.22 . . . shorten the time for filing an action against a bond by following the procedures set forth in section 713.22 . . . See §§ 713.22(1) & (2); 713.24(4), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

PIERSON D. CONSTRUCTION, INC. a v. YUDELL, 863 So. 2d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . question as follows: WHERE AN OWNER FILES A NOTICE OF CONTEST OF A CONTRACTOR’S LIEN PURSUANT TO SECTION 713.22 . . . ITS FINAL CONTRACTOR’S AFFIDAVIT NO LATER THAN THE 60 DAY LIMITATION PERIOD PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 713.22 . . . The statute provides: 713.22. . . . It is the section 713.22(2) 60 day period that is the applicable statute of limitations in this case. . . . The operable statute of limitations is the 60 day period provided by section 713.22(2). . . .

ALLIED ROOFING INDUSTRIES, INC. v. VENEGAS,, 862 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 713.22(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

PRIVAS v. BRISSON CUSTOM HOMES, INC. a, 817 So. 2d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Sections 713.06(3)(d) and 713.22 of the Florida Statutes govern the outcome of this case. . . . Section 713.22, Florida Statutes (2001), provides: (1) No lien provided by this part shall continue for . . . a construction lien must be commenced within one year after the original claim of lien is filed. § 713.22 . . .

MORSE DIESEL INTERNATIONAL, INC. a v. ISLAND BOULEVARD, INC. a, 698 So. 2d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . commence an action to foreclose upon the same within the one (1) year period prescribed by section 713.22 . . . : If no proceeding to enforce a transferred lien shall be commenced within the time specified in s. 713.22 . . .

HOEPNER ASSOCIATES, INC. v. STEWART GILMAN COMPANY, INC., 648 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . See § 713.22(1), Fla.Stat. (1991) (no lien shah continue for a longer period than one year after the . . .

BUSTO, v. BLOOM,, 641 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Sec. 713.22(2), Fla.Stat.; Charles Redi-Mix, Inc. v. . . .

LEHMANN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a v. NIRENBLATT d b a d b a d b a, 629 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . the time period within which an action to enforce a construction lien must be commenced under section 713.22 . . . Section 713.22(1), Florida Statutes (1991), provides that: No lien provided by part 1 shall continue . . . also apply to the period within which an action to enforce the lien must be commenced under section 713.22 . . .

NACHON ENTERPRISES INC. a v. ALEXDEX CORPORATION, a, 615 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 713.22(1) provides that a lien is not enforceable after one year from the recording of the claim . . .

MEYEROWICH, d b a v. CARRERE GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC., 611 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Appellant filed suit on May 4, 1990 as required by section 713.22(2), Florida Statutes (1989), to foreclose . . . The application of section 713.22(2), Florida Statutes (1989), automatically extinguished any claim to . . . Rose Meyerowich’s claim to foreclose the mechanic’s lien had expired by the operation of section 713.22 . . .

A. FORT, v. B. LOPEZ,, 580 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . In this action the one year period provided in section 713.22, Florida Statutes, for the bringing of . . .

CHARLES REDI- MIX, INC. v. PHILLIPS, 580 So. 2d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Sec. 713.22(1). . . . Here, section 713.22(2), Florida Statutes (1989), provides: (2) An owner or his agent or attorney may . . . Section 713.22(2) does not need “fixin” in my view. . . . Appellant claims its actions were not barred under section 713.22(2) and appel-lees cross-appeal the . . . However, the last sentence of section 713.22(2) unambiguously states that “service shall be deemed complete . . .

BLANK, v. FORSYTHE, HUMPHREY ASSOCIATES, AIA, a, 567 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . We agree that section 713.22(1), Florida Statutes (1987), did not preclude the cross-claim. . . .

J. BATTEN CORP. v. OAKRIDGE INVESTMENTS LTD., 546 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . See § 713.22, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

WILLIAMS, HATFIELD STONER, INC. v. A E DESIGN, INC., 538 So. 2d 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . no proceeding to enforce a transferred lien shall be commenced within the time specified in section 713.22 . . .

HOLDING ELECTRIC, INC. v. M. ROBERTS,, 530 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 1988)

. . . . § 713.22(1), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

M. FOY, III, v. P. MANGUM, Jr., 528 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . On motion for rehearing, the court ruled for the Man-gums on the ground that section 713.22(1), Florida . . . of extending the one year time limit in which to file suit to foreclose a mechanic's lien in section 713.22 . . . Section 713.22(2) was intended to protect the owner. . . . Were the re-filing allowed to extend the one year time period of section 713.22(1), a property owner . . . Section 713.22(1), Florida Statutes (1983) provides: 713.22 Duration of lien.— (1) No lien provided by . . .

M. SCOTT P. M. D. D. S. P. A. v. E. HAUFLER, B. L. J. O L. O A. W. F. O. C. L. G. J. C. Co. d b a Co., 526 So. 2d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . upon failure of those appellees to file an enforcement action within one year, as required by section 713.22 . . . counterclaim was filed within one year from the time it filed its claim of lien, as required by section 713.22 . . . Section 713.22(1) provides in pertinent part: 713.22 Duration of lien.— (1) No lien provided by part . . . For further clarification, on this issue, see the statutory history of sections 713.21 and 713.22, Florida . . .

COQUINA, LTD. a v. NICHOLSON CABINET COMPANY,, 509 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . , can nevertheless be considered a timely filing in order to meet the 60-day requirement of section 713.22 . . . to sixty days when Coquina filed a notice of contest of lien pursuant to the provisions of section 713.22 . . . same time as the 1963 amendment (Ch. 63-135, Laws of Florida (1963)) adding the provision (now section 713.22 . . .

CORBIN WELL PUMP AND SUPPLY, INCORPORATED, v. D. KOON, M. O. H., 482 So. 2d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . It was the last day allowed to file the lien foreclosure, pursuant to section 713.22(1), Florida Statutes . . . this time period can only be halted by filing suit in a “court of competent jurisdiction,” section 713.22 . . .

In HALLMARK BUILDERS, INC. ARTISTIC FLOORS, INC. v. HALLMARK BUILDERS, INC., 54 B.R. 120 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . Artistic with a paper purporting to be a Notice of Contest of Lien, filed pursuant to Florida Statute 713.22 . . .

SITE- PREP, INC. v. TAI,, 472 So. 2d 766 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . appeal is whether the date of service is counted in computing the sixty-day time period in section 713.22 . . .

C. WESTCOTT, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, D., 611 F. Supp. 351 (D. Neb. 1984)

. . . Section 713.22 (1983) provides: “(b) A producer who is determined by the State committee, or the county . . . Section 713.22(b) provides that farmers who adopt a “scheme or device” to defeat the purpose of a program . . .

K. HIERS, B. v. THOMAS, Jr., 458 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See § 713.22(1), Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

SUNSHINE BUILDERS, v. TAYLOR, d b a SUNSHINE BUILDERS OF PALM BEACH, INC. v. TAYLOR, d b a, 456 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . §§ 713.21, 713.22(1), Fla.Stat. (1983); Hughey v. . . . but these two sections were substantially the same as our current Florida Statute Sections 713.21 and 713.22 . . .

C. SCARFONE, v. S. MARIN, 442 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . year after the recording of appellant’s claim of lien, and therefore, the action was barred by section 713.22 . . .

STATE- WIDE CONSTRUCTION, INC. a v. M. DOWDA N., 424 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . to foreclose a mechanic’s lien based on a recorded claim of lien on the property pursuant to section 713.22 . . .

In W. ALLEN YOUNG ASSOCIATES, INC. W. ALLEN YOUNG ASSOCIATES, INC. v. EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP., 15 B.R. 20 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1981)

. . . competent jurisdiction to enforce its mechanics lien claim within 60 days as required by Fla.Stat. 713.22 . . . One of these conditions is set forth in Fla.Stat. § 713.22 which provides in sub-clause (2) that the . . .

COTTON STATES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. HUNT TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC., 395 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Sec. 713.22(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). See also Sec. 713.23, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . .

FEDERATED STORES REALTY, INC. d b a s s v. K. BURNSTEIN, a v. KINGLAND CONTRACTING CORPORATION,, 392 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Finally, the owner of a property interest subjected to a lien has recourse to Section 713.22(2), Florida . . .

AMERICAN FIRE CASUALTY CO. v. DAVIS WATER WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC., 377 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 1979)

. . . should not be held liable on its bond because its joinder as defendant was not timely under section 713.22 . . . enforce the lien was filed within one year of the recording of the claim of lien as required by section 713.22 . . . construction of canals and shall also include the altering, repairing and redoing of all said things. . . 713.22 . . .

CANAM SYSTEMS, INC. a v. LAKE BUCHANAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. UNITED BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. L. N. a, 375 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . provides: If no proceeding to enforce a transferred lien shall be commenced within the time specified in § 713.22 . . . In turn, Section 713.22(1), Florida Statutes (1973) provides: Duration of lien. — No lien provided by . . .

CORRY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. HECTOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES, INC. O- Co., 363 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 713.22(1) requires that actions to enforce a claim of lien commence within one year after the . . .

KOEHLER ELECTRICAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. v. BERKLEY Co., 362 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Sec. 713.22(1). . . .

E. E. DEAN SNAVELY, INC. v. SULLIVAN, 360 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . his lien by not filing suit within one year after he filed his claim of lien as required by Section 713.22 . . .

AMERICAN FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, v. DAVIS WATER WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. d b a a J. Jr. E. J. d b a a J., 358 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . : “If no proceeding to enforce a transferred lien shall be commenced within the time specified in § 713.22 . . . this section clearly intends that any future proceedings be commenced within the year set forth in § 713.22 . . . We are assuming that the period refers to one year from the filing of the claim of lien as in § 713.22 . . .

VIC TANNY OF FLORIDA, INC. v. FRED McGILVRAY, INC. a, 348 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . served by registered mail a Notice of Contest of Lien upon Fred McGilvray, Inc., pursuant to Section 713.22 . . . Tanny of Florida, Inc., because no suit had been filed on the bond within the time limited by Section 713.22 . . . 4) If no proceeding to enforce a transferred lien shall be commenced within the time specified in § 713.22 . . .

ASSOCIATED TELEVISION AND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a v. DUTCH VILLAGE MOBILE HOMES OF MELBOURNE, LTD. a d b a, 347 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . , for failure to file same within one year of the recording of said claim of lien, pursuant to F.S. 713.22 . . .

REGAL WOOD PRODUCTS, INC. v. FIRST WISCONSIN NATIONAL BANK OF MILWAUKEE,, 347 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 713.22(1). . . . Section 713.22(1), Florida Statutes (1975), provides: No lien provided by part I of this chapter shall . . . : If no proceeding to enforce a transferred lien shall be commenced within the time specified in s. 713.22 . . .

DIVERSIFIED MORTGAGE INVESTORS, a v. D. BENJAMIN d b a, 345 So. 2d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . commenced an action for the enforcement of same, in accordance with the requirements of §§ 713.21 and 713.22 . . . Sections 713.21 and 713.22 (1971), Florida Statutes, provide that a mechanic’s lien must be enforced . . . year of recording a lien to perfect it against record fee holder, the lien was discharged per Section 713.22 . . .

HAWAIIAN INN OF DAYTONA BEACH, INC. v. H. DUNN d b a, 342 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . year from completing delivery to claim a lien and sue for foreclosure under Sections 713.08(5) and 713.22 . . .

B H SALES, INC. v. FUSCO CORPORATION, d b a, 342 So. 2d 105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . corporate name, dismissed the action for failure to file suit within one year as required by Section 713.22 . . . Nevertheless, we feel that to literally enforce the one year limitation of Section 713.22(1) would-— . . .

S. HAMILTON v. LARGO PAINT DECORATING INC., 335 So. 2d 623 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . lien count on the grounds that the cause was barred by the one year limitation period prescribed § 713.22 . . .

NATIONAL MOTEL CORP. v. A. LAREAU d b a, 327 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Prod., Inc., 246 So.2d 97 (Fla.1971), permits filing of a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien under § 713.22 . . .

GENERAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. SUNRISE NURSING HOMES, INC., 326 So. 2d 446 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . part: If no proceeding to enforce a transferred lien shall be commenced within the time specified in § 713.22 . . .

HARRIS PAINT COMPANY, v. MULTICON PROPERTIES, INC., 326 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 713.22(1) is applicable. . . . recorded its claim of lien and six months after the one year period of limitations imposed by F.S. § 713.22 . . . A fundamental purpose of the limitation periods established by F.S. § 713.22(1) and § 713.24(4) is the . . .

KEELER, v. HILLS, F. BURBIDGE, v. HILLS,, 408 F. Supp. 386 (N.D. Ga. 1975)

. . . . §§ 713.211 through 713.22, do not provide for an individual to raise before the Department class claims . . .

H. BOSTON, Sr. E. v. AMES APPLIANCE CENTER, INC., 312 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . , without cause, to deliver the summons to the sheriff until after the 60-day period set forth in § 713.22 . . .

C. DYKEMA, v. TRANS STATE INDUSTRIES, INC., 303 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . The appellee, as authorized by the provisions of Section 713.22(2), Florida Statutes, duly served upon . . . Section 713.22(2), supra. . . . however, it clearly appears that he did not pursue that remedy within the time prescribed in Section 713.22 . . .

RUOCCO, v. P. BRINKER,, 380 F. Supp. 432 (S.D. Fla. 1974)

. . . . § 713.22, F.S.A. . F.S. § 713.05, F.S.A. and F.S. § 713.-07(2), F.S.A. . . . . See F.S. §§ 713.-21 (3) and 713.22, F.S.A. . . .

JACK STILSON CO. a v. CALOOSA BAYVIEW CORPORATION, a, 278 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Section 713.22(2), F.S.A., specifically requires that a copy of a notice of contest shall be mailed by . . . Section 713.22(2), F.S.A., should be read in connection with F.S. . . . As the majority has it, Section 713.22(2) supervenes Section 713.08(4) (b) and it will avail a lienor . . . . § 713.22(2) ?” . . . refiling with simply an amendment to it adds to the time; this was not contemplated by the lien statute, § 713.22 . . .

JACK STILSON CO. a v. CALOOSA BAYVIEW CORPORATION, a, 265 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . thereafter an owner files his notice of contest (bringing into play the foregoing 60 days provision of § 713.22 . . . no other way of accelerating the enforcement of a lien except for the provisions of the aforesaid § 713.22 . . . if he doesn’t file such a complaint under § 713.21(4) aforesaid, that the 60 day period allowed by § 713.22 . . . 138 Fla. 485, 189 So. 710. . § 713.08(5), F.S.1969, F.S.A. . § 713.08(4) (b), F.S.1969, F.S.A. . § 713.22 . . . . § 713.22(2), F.S.A., provides the process by which a property owner may accelerate the time for bringing . . . to foreclose the lien and did not file the second suit within the sixty days provided for in Section 713.22 . . .