Cases from cite.case.law:

RINGHAVER EQUIPMENT COMPANY, v. BROOKS,, 565 So. 2d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 713.75 is perhaps more applicable to the facts in this ease, but it reaches the same result. . . . the time of the service of the notice provided for by this section, (emphasis supplied) Under section 713.75 . . .

In DESCO MARINE, INC. ACE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a v. PJ L ASSOCIATES, a a St. a, 58 B.R. 40 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . Because Deseo Marine was not in privity with the plaintiff, any lien rights are governed by § 713.75 . . . constitute notice and is as a matter of law not sufficient to create a lien under the provisions of § 713.75 . . . The notice provision of § 713.75, Florida Statutes is as follows: A person entitled to acquire a lien . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. FIRST SECURITIES COMPANY OF CHICAGO, CUSTOMER CREDITORS COMMITTEE, v. B. McKY,, 528 F.2d 449 (7th Cir. 1976)

. . . The Customer Creditors Committee has appealed (1) the awarding of $197,-713.75 to the receiver’s attorneys . . . We affirm the allowance of $197,-713.75 to the attorneys for the receiver; we reverse the denial of compensation . . .

A. ROBERTS, d b a v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MANATEE COUNTY,, 222 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . attaches to the property is determined by either Section 85.25 or Section 85.26 (now § 713.74 and § 713.75 . . .

CANADA DRY BOTTLING CO. OF FLORIDA, a Co. a v. MEEKINS, INC. OF DADE COUNTY, a, 219 So. 2d 439 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 713.75(1), Fla.Stat. (1967), F.S.A. .§ 85.021, Fla.Stat. (1967), F.S.A. . See note 2. . . . .

POLICARE, v. UNITED STATES, 174 F. Supp. 782 (E.D.N.Y. 1959)

. . . loss of future earning capacity, $5,000; his pain and suffering, $5,-000; and his medical expenses, $713.75 . . .

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. MELDRUM FEWSMITH,, 230 F.2d 283 (6th Cir. 1956)

. . . One of the deficiencies which was so determined by the Commissioner was in the amount of $713.75 in respondent . . . the claimed deficiencies other than the deficiency in income tax in the above mentioned amount of $713.75 . . . deficiency of the income tax of 1944, which, as heretofore said, he had determined in the amount of $713.75 . . . contention that respondent’s income tax deficiency for the year ending March 31, 1944, in the amount of $713.75 . . . that the Tax Court was in error in determining that respondent’s income tax deficiency amounted to $713.75 . . .

INDIANA LIMESTONE CO. v. SMITH, 85 F. Supp. 652 (S.D. Ind. 1949)

. . . $109,873.52, but the correct amount was later determined by revenue agents’ examination to be $134,-713.75 . . .