Home
Jacksonville Location Phone Call/Texting Policy How do Fees Work?
Criminal Defense DUI Defense Foreclosure Defense Copyright Workers Compensation Attorney Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statutes Georgia Code Jacksonville Accident Attorney Real Estate Attorney Jacksonville Florida Criminal Lawyer Jacksonville Notary Public
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 718.102 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 718.102 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 718.102

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 718
CONDOMINIUMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 718.102
718.102 Purposes.—The purpose of this chapter is:
(1) To give statutory recognition to the condominium form of ownership of real property.
(2) To establish procedures for the creation, sale, and operation of condominiums.

Every condominium created and existing in this state shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter.

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-222.

F.S. 718.102 on Google Scholar

F.S. 718.102 on Casetext

Amendments to 718.102


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 718.102
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 718.102.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

OAK GROVE RESOURCES, LLC, AIG, v. DIRECTOR, OWCP, U. S. LLC, U. S. v. M. O. B. O. OWCP,, 920 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 718.102(e) (emphasis added). . . .

S. DAY, Jr. As S. Sr. As v. JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION, d b a d b a LLC d b a MD,, 907 F.3d 766 (4th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 718.102(e)(2)(iii). . . .

ELKAY MINING COMPANY, v. C. SMITH, W., 712 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 718.102 (2013) (referring only to x-rays produced on “film”). . . . (a) requires that x-ray evidence meet the quality standards for x-rays set forth under 20 C.F.R. § 718.102 . . . Formerly, 20 C.F.R. § 718.102 set forth classification and quality standards only for analog x-rays. . . . See 20 C.F.R. § 718.102 (2013). . . . . § 718.102(b). . . . .

SEA B MINING COMPANY, c o v. ADDISON, Of, 831 F.3d 244 (4th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 718.102, 718.202). Consequently, the ALJ did not consider this x-ray evidence in its analysis. . . .

COASTAL COAL- WEST VIRGINIA, LLC, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, L., 624 F. App'x 824 (4th Cir. 2015)

. . . the Use of the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneu-moconiosis as provided in § 718.102 . . .

ANTELOPE COAL COMPANY RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA, v. E. GOODIN, 743 F.3d 1331 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 718.102. Id. § 718.104(a)(5). . . . Section 718.102 provides that an x-ray must be of suitable quality for proper classification of pneumoconiosis . . . Id. § 718.102. . . .

WHITAKER COAL CORPORATION, v. OSBORNE Of, 526 F. App'x 567 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 718.102(b), with categories 1, 2, and 3 indicating simple pneumoconiosis and categories A, B, and . . .

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, a v. RIVER MANOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 125 So. 3d 846 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 718.102, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

LITTLE DAVID COAL CO. Co. v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Of, 532 F. App'x 633 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 718.102; 718.106; 718.202(a)(l)-(2). . . .

In MONA LISA AT CELEBRATION, LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC,, 472 B.R. 582 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 718.102 ("Every condominium created and existing in this state shall be subject to the provisions . . .

TRANQUIL HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a v. BBT, LLC E N, LLC L. S S LLC, 79 So. 3d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .” § 718.102, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

ISPAT INLAND, INC, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, L., 422 F. App'x 153 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 718.202(a)(1) (“A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 may form the . . .

ISPAT INLAND, INC. v. DIRECTOR OWCP,, 422 F. App'x 149 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 718.202(a)(1) (“A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 may form the . . .

GUNDERSON, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 601 F.3d 1013 (10th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 718.202(a)(1); 718.102 (2002). Id. at 7. Mr. . . . any event, the letter did not meet the standards for x-rays set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 718.202(a) and § 718.102 . . . Board-eligible radiologist or a certified 'B' reader (see § 718.202), he or she shall so indicate.” 20 C.F.R. § 718.102 . . . . §§ 718202(a)(1); 718.102 (2002). . . . because it failed to meet the standards for x-ray evidence as set forth in 20 C.F.R. §§718.202(a)(1)and 718.102 . . . the MSHA letter failed to meet the standards for x-rays as set forth in Sections 718.202(a)(1) and 718.102 . . . This x-ray does not meet the standards adopted by the Regulations at 20 C.F.R. § 718.102 (2002). . . .

PHILLIPS, v. HIRSHON,, 958 So. 2d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Stat. (1977), a provision paralleling section 718.102 of the new Condominium Act, Ch. 718, Fla. . . . .” § 718.102, Fla. Stat. (1977). Cf. § 711.02, Fla. . . .

WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY, v. M. AMICK, 123 F. App'x 525 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . pneumoconiosis may be made as follows: (1) A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 . . .

U. S. STEEL MINING COMPANY, LLC, v. DIRECTOR, OWCP,, 386 F.3d 977 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 718.102(b); see also Am. Mining Cong. v. . . . x-rays classified as category 0-, 0/0, or 0/1 are read as negative for pneumoconiosis. 20 C.F.R. § 718.102 . . .

BETHENERGY MINES, INCORPORATED, v. L. CUNNINGHAM, 104 F. App'x 881 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 718.102(c) (generally requiring x-ray reports to include the qualifications of the reader, but specifically . . .

CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, v. E. SWIGER, 98 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 718.102. . . .

CANNELTON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, v. H. FRYE, 93 F. App'x 551 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 718.102(b), which states that “a 0/1 classification does not constitute evidence of pneumoconiosis . . . For example, 20 C.F.R. § 718.102(c) states that “if the physician interpreting the film is a Board-certified . . . x-ray shall be accepted by the Office if ... such x-ray has been taken by a radiologist.”); 20 C.F.R. § 718.102 . . .

MILBURN COLLIERY COMPANY, v. DIRECTOR OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,, 68 F. App'x 492 (4th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 718.102(b). Fifteen of the readings were positive for pneumoconiosis; twenty-two were negative. . . .

J. CHAMBERS, v. OLD HICKORY COAL COMPANY Of, 68 F. App'x 423 (4th Cir. 2003)

. . . pneumoconiosis may be made as follows: (1) A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 . . .

CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, v. O. HELD, 314 F.3d 184 (4th Cir. 2002)

. . . pneu-moconiosis may be made as follows: (1) A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 . . .

WOLF CREEK COLLIERIES, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,, 298 F.3d 511 (6th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 718.102(b). . In addition to what Drs. Broudy and Wright noted about Mr. . . .

ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY, v. E. COMPTON, 211 F.3d 203 (4th Cir. 2000)

. . . pneumo-coniosis may be made as follows: (1) A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 . . .

In PENN ALLEGHENY COAL COMPANY v. D. WILLIAMS, 114 F.3d 22 (3d Cir. 1997)

. . . pneumoconiosis may be made as follows: (1) A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 . . .

In RIVER RANCH, INC. RIVER RANCH, INC. v. OUTDOOR RESORTS RIVER RANCH INNS AND COTTAGES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. R R, 188 B.R. 693 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . ownership in Florida is governed by Chapter 718 of the Florida Statutes which provides as follows: 718.102 . . .

E. SUMMERS, v. FREEMAN UNITED COAL MINING CO., 14 F.3d 1220 (7th Cir. 1994)

. . . pneumoco-niosis may be made as follows: (1) A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 . . .

ROGERS FORD CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, v. CARLANDIA CORPORATION,, 626 So. 2d 1350 (Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 718.102; see also Century Village, Inc. v. . . .

GREENWICH COLLIERIES, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,, 990 F.2d 730 (3d Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 718.202(a)(1), 718.102. . . .

RISHER, v. OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM, 940 F.2d 327 (8th Cir. 1991)

. . . . §§ 718.102, 718.202(a)(1). . . .

OLIVER, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 888 F.2d 1239 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . ALJ White’s remand order of January 24, 1983, appears as DX-21. . 20 CFR 718.102(c). . . . .

J. NAPIER, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,, 890 F.2d 669 (4th Cir. 1989)

. . . basis of one of four methods: (1) chest X-rays conducted in accordance with quality standards of § 718.102 . . .

SAGINAW MINING COMPANY, v. L. FERDA,, 879 F.2d 198 (6th Cir. 1989)

. . . . §§ 727.206, 718.102-.107. . . .

In PENN ALLEGHENY COAL COMPANY v. MERCATELL, U. S., 878 F.2d 106 (3d Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 718.102. . . .

OCEANS FOUR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. STAFFORD,, 545 So. 2d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 718.102, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

GARCIA, A. v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 869 F.2d 1413 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 718.102(b), ,202(a)(l)(i). . . .

MULLINS COAL CO. INC. OF VIRGINIA, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 484 U.S. 135 (U.S. 1987)

. . . The Court notes that §718.102(e), a regulation defining standards required of X rays, refers to an X . . . interpretation because it was not sufficiently identified to satisfy the requirements for X-ray evidence under §718.102 . . . Section 718.102(e) (1987) provides, in part: “(e) No chest X-ray shall constitute evidence of the presence . . .

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, v. MANGIFEST,, 826 F.2d 1318 (3d Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 718.102(e), 718.103(c), 718.-106(b). . . . Section 718.102, for example, mandates inter alia that X-ray machines possess a "rotating anode tube” . . . with a sufficiently narrow source and that exposures not exceed one twentieth of a second. § 718.102 . . .

STAPLETON, v. WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY, U. S. R. RAY, v. JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION MULLINS COAL COMPANY, INC. OF VIRGINIA, v. CORNETT, 785 F.2d 424 (4th Cir. 1986)

. . . . §§ 410-426(b); 410.428; 410.430; 718.102; 718.103; 718.105; Part 718, Appendices A, B, C; 727.206 ( . . . . §§ 727.206(a), 718.102, 718.104, 410.-428. . . .

BENNETT M. LIFTER, INC. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, 15 Fla. Supp. 2d 60 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . Plaintiffs to prohibit the creation, sale and leasing of condominium units in violation of Section 718.102 . . .

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, v. CONGLETON,, 743 F.2d 428 (6th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 718.102(c). . . . . § 718.102(e) states that "[n]o chest X-ray shall constitute evidence of the presence or absence of . . .

FIRST SARASOTA SERVICE CORPORATION d b a a a v. G. MILLER K. P. M. E. J. E. M., 450 So. 2d 875 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . § 718.102. . . .

CLEARWATER KEY ASSOCIATION- SOUTH BEACH, INC. a v. THACKER P., 431 So. 2d 641 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . See § 718.102, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .

T. RAINES, v. PALM BEACH LEISUREVILLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., 413 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 1982)

. . . . § 718.102. . . .

COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT FIVE, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, v. MARSHALL, R. s A., 667 F.2d 336 (3d Cir. 1981)

. . . (See 20 CFR 718.102 and 718.202 for films taken on or after April 1,1980. . . . regulations establishing the requirements for the techniques used in taking X-rays, see 20 C.F.R. § 718.102 . . .

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, v. ROCIO CORP. a a a, 404 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 718.102(1), (2), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . The purpose of the Condominium Act, Section 718.102(1), is “to give statutory recognition to the condominium . . .