The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . that the amendment procedures used by Appellants violated the terms of the declaration and section 718.110 . . . that the Club memberships were “appurtenances to the condominium units” and thus subject to section 718.110 . . . the amendments to the declaration made in 2010 were invalid as a matter of law, pursuant to section 718.110 . . . defined, the unanimous approval of amendments modifying such appurtenances, as provided in section 718.110 . . . if the amendments at issue were modifications or alterations of appurtenances to the units, section 718.110 . . .
. . . . § 718.110(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . amendment, it may be amended as to all matters, except those described in subsections (4) or (8) of section 718.110 . . . Thus, “section 718.110 ... provides broad authority for amending a declaration of condominium.” . . .
. . . . § 718.110(10) (2010), a declaration is effective to create a condominium, despite any fatal defects . . . Stat. § 718.110(10) (2010) bars the plaintiffs from arguing that purported errors in the Sarasota Cay . . . Although § 718.104(4) contains an explicit list of what a declaration “must” contain, § 718.110(10) provides . . . In our view, the plain language of § 718.110(10) severely limits the plaintiffs’ argument that alleged . . . We expressly limit our holding to the version of § 718.110(10) in existence at the time the plaintiffs . . .
. . . The Court finds that the plaintiffs' claim on this point is untimely pursuant to § 718.110(10) and is . . .
. . . Stat. 718.110(4) states: no amendment may change the configuration or size of any unit in any material . . .
. . . However, sections 718.103(15), 718.106, and 718.110(4), govern-mg condominiums, essentially mirror the . . .
. . . provisions apparently not brought to the trial court’s attention, including section 718.115(2) and section 718.110 . . .
. . . .” § 718.110(3), Fla. . . .
. . . dismissed and there remained three claims against appellee: (I) breach of statutory duty under section 718.110 . . .
. . . AMENDMENTS TO DECLARATION Significantly, section 718.110 also provides broad authority for amending a . . . In particular, section 718.110(l)(a) provides: If the declaration fails to provide a method of amendment . . . Of course, section 718.110(l)(a) itself contains some restrictions on the amendment process. . . . See § 718.110(4), (8), Fla. Stat. (2000). These provisions are not at issue here. . . . See § 718.110(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .
. . . Condominium which occurred in this case is contrary to the requirements of section 718.113(2) and section 718.110 . . . Section 718.110(4) provided: Unless otherwise provided in the declaration as originally recorded, no . . . This argument is contrary to sections 718.113(2) and 718.110(4), Florida Statutes (1989). . . . Villas Recreation Association, Inc., 525 So.2d 438, 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), as follows: Under section 718.110 . . . Some years after this interpretation of section 718.110(4) by this and other courts, the legislature . . .
. . . and ineffective because all record unit owners failed to approve the amendment as required by section 718.110 . . . Because any effort to amend the documents was ineffective under section 718.110(4), the trial court’s . . .
. . . .” § 718.110(3), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . Our construction brings section 718.403 into express harmony with sections 718.104(2) and 718.110(3). . . .
. . . See § 718.110(10), Fla.Stat. . . . .
. . . See § 718.110(4), Fla.Stat. (1989); Young v. . . .
. . . See § 718.110(4), Fla. Stat. (1989); Beau Monde, Inc. v. Bramson, 446 So.2d 164 (Fla.2d DCA 1984). . . .
. . . Section 718.110(4), Florida Statutes, effective October 1, 1986, does not require that the amendment . . .
. . . already said, this is not a condominium development, yet a close parallel can be found under section 718.110 . . .
. . . recreation association for the cost, without unanimous approval of the members as required by section 718.110 . . . Under section 718.110(4), Florida Statutes (1985), a material alteration or modification of the appurtenances . . . The legislative intent of the requirement in section 718.110(4) of unanimous approval of any material . . .
. . . Article VIII is consistent with statutory section 718.110(4) which provides: Unless otherwise provided . . . The appellees additionally argue that section 718.110(4) applies only “[ujnless otherwise provided in . . .
. . . Section 718.110(1)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1984), provides that, in the absence of a method of amendment . . . common surplus unless the record owner of the unit ... join[s] in the execution of the amendment. § 718.110 . . . Although subsections (5), (9), and (10) of section 718.110, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984), provide for . . . are made by recording in the public records of the county where the land is located. §§ 718.104(2), 718.110 . . .
. . . the reformation action initiated by the Association in circuit court was not authorized by section 718.110 . . . The dissenting unit owners argued that pursuant to section 718.110(4) and section 718.115(2) no change . . . it had common law jurisdiction to order reformation and statutory jurisdiction pursuant to section 718.110 . . . Further, according to the Division, neither was the issue of whether, by operation of section 718.110 . . . could not utilize section 718.-110(10) but was required to follow the procedure outlined in section 718.110 . . .
. . . The above two cases, and Florida Statute Section 718.110(4) (1984 Supp.) govern the case at bar. 10. . . . Thus, under the original condominium documents and Florida Statute Section 718.110(4) (1984 Supp.), the . . . Sec. 718.110(4); Beau Monde, Inc. v. . . .
. . . within the association to materially alter or modify the appurtenances to the unit pursuant to section 718.110 . . .
. . . Statute 718.110(4) However the court recognizes the correctness of defendant’s legal position but views . . . Statute 718.110(4) provides that the common elements cannot be materially changed without the approval . . .
. . . In this regard, though we were not cited to it, the proviso obviously tracks Section 718.110(4), Florida . . .
. . . unanimous consent of all unit owners was required by the original condominium documents and by section 718.110 . . . We, accordingly, hold that Beau Monde’s attempt to do so is governed by section 718.110(4) and by the . . . Section 718.110(4) provides as follows: (4) Unless otherwise provided in the declaration as originally . . .
. . . summary judgment if, in fact, there was non-compliance by appellant with the requirements of sections 718.110 . . .
. . . We find Section 718.110(4), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978) and Article VII of the Declaration of Condominium . . . Section 718.110(4) provides: Unless otherwise provided in the declaration as originally recorded, no . . . This'includes Section 718.110(4), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). . . . Article VII of the Declaration of Condominium is consistent with § 718.110(4), supra, in providing that . . . Article VII, Declaration of Condominium, § 718.110(4), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1978). . . .
. . . See Sections 718.110 and 718.-112, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .
. . . The Government contends that the findings of an erroneous notice under Section 718.110(b), Regulations . . .