Cases from cite.case.law:

In VELEZ, 465 B.R. 912 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . assignment” as “an assignment for the benefit of creditors made under this chapter” which, pursuant to § 727.102 . . .

PEABODY COAL COMPANY, v. SPESE,, 117 F.3d 1001 (7th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 727.102(b) (defining “denied” claim). . . .

A. TAYLOR, v. CLINCHFIELD COAL CO., 895 F.2d 178 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . arguable that the erroneous finding of the ALJ, affirmed by the Board, that there was rebuttal under § 727.102 . . .

TONELLI, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, As E. III,, 878 F.2d 1083 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 727.102(b)(5), it cannot be revived merely by filing a subsequent claim. See Spese v. . . .