Cases from cite.case.law:

BASILE v. ALDRICH, In, 70 So. 3d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . section 732.604 (“Failure of testamentary provision”), section 732.605 (“Change in securities”), section 732.606 . . .

In ESTATE OF V. PADGETT, Sr. V. PADGETT, Jr. v. PADGETT, V. Sr., 547 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . same as a devise of the property subject to the option within the meaning of sections 731.201(8) and 732.606 . . . provision created a specific devise, appellant still would not be able to recover anything under Section 732.606 . . . Section 732.606 (Florida's nonademption statute) provides in part: (2) A specific devisee has the right . . .

In ESTATE OF J. JONES, HALL, v. C. JONES, J., 472 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 732.606, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

CENTURY NATIONAL BANK OF BROWARD, v. A. BRYAN, III, H. BRYAN, Sr. v. A. BRYAN, III, P., 468 So. 2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Wilson, 399 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), which held that section 732.606(1), Florida Statutes (1979 . . .

OTT, v. OTT,, 418 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 732.606 reads: 732.606 Nonademption of specific devises in certain cases; sale by guardian of . . . wording of the statute, resolution of this issue is aided by an examination of the background of section 732.606 . . . If the intention of the legislature in adopting section 732.606 was to follow the lead of the Uniform . . . Wilson, 399 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), the Fifth District observed: “To give effect to Section 732.606 . . .

C. OWEN, v. WILSON, W. Jr. F. S., 399 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . The main issue is whether Florida’s nonademption statute, section 732.606, Florida Statutes (1979), applies . . . After due objections and amendments, the trial court concluded that section 732.606(1), did not apply . . . The trial court erred in finding that prior case law determined the applicability of section 732.606. . . . To give effect to section 732.606, any unpaid proceeds of specific devises are to be paid to the devisee . . . Sec. 732.606(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). The Florida Probate Code does not define “guardian.” . . .

GANIER, DOOLAN, v. F. GANIER,, 402 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 732.606(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . .

DOBSON, v. K. LAWSON,, 370 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Appellant argues that the foregoing statute is not applicable to a sale with deferred payments because § 732.606 . . . This statute appears to control unless it is modified by the immediately preceding subsection (1) of § 732.606 . . . Simon, 1977, 12.09, page 177, in footnote 4 relating to ademption under § 732.606(2)(a) stating as follows . . .

In COLE S ESTATE, 44 Fla. Supp. 153 (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. 1976)

. . . However, Section 732.606 of our Florida Probate Code, which became effective January 1, 1976, provides . . . The new Probate Act, §732.606, provides in part as follows — “ (1) If specifically devised property is . . . to thé net sales price of the property bequeathed to them and sold by the guardian as provided in §732.606 . . . If my conclusion as to the applicability of §732.606 to the situation here presented is erroneous, it . . . This is the proverbial red cow case, and in my judgment is controlling here even in the absence of §732.606 . . .