Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 744.357 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 744.357 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 744.357

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLIII
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
Chapter 744
GUARDIANSHIP
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 744.357
744.357 Liability of surety.No surety for a guardian shall be charged beyond the property of the ward.
History.s. 1, ch. 74-106; ss. 19, 26, ch. 75-222; s. 43, ch. 89-96; s. 27, ch. 90-271.
Note.Created from former s. 744.43.

F.S. 744.357 on Google Scholar

F.S. 744.357 on Casetext

Amendments to 744.357


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 744.357
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 744.357.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SANCHEZ, v. AN LUXURY IMPORTS OF PEMBROKE PINES, INC. d b a, 216 So. 3d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . be awarded against a surety on a guardianship bond under section 627.428, the provision of section 744.357 . . . incurred because the surety unreasonably delayed the payment of a claim was “not protected by section 744.357 . . . therefore, held that awards of attorneys’ fees in such cases were limited by the mandate of section 744.357 . . . The language of section 744.357 providing that “[n]o surety for a guardian shall be charged beyond the . . . This is distinguishable from Nichols and the instant case; in Nichols, section 744.357 provided such . . .

DAVID BOLAND, INCORPORATED, v. TRANS COASTAL ROOFING COMPANY,, 851 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2003)

. . . be awarded against a surety on a guardianship bond under section 627.428, the provision of section 744.357 . . . incurred because the surety unreasonably delayed the payment of a claim was “not protected by section 744.357 . . . therefore, held that awards of attorneys’ fees in such cases were limited by the mandate of section 744.357 . . . Even though the question certified to this Court addresses a performance bond to which section 744.357 . . . The Nichols decision, however, rests entirely on section 744.357’s limit to total recovery under guardianship . . .

OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY, v. E. REISCHMANN, W., 713 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Nichols also concluded that section 744.357, Florida Statutes (1995), does not preclude an award of attorneys . . . Section 744.357, Florida Statutes (1995) provides: “No surety for a guardian shall be charged beyond . . .

L. NICHOLS, v. PREFERRED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 704 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 1997)

. . . The district eourt found, however, that section 744.357, Florida Statutes (1995), limited any such fees . . . awarded under section 627.428, we must next address whether such attorney’s fees are limited by section 744.357 . . . In this regard, we disagree with the district court’s conclusion that section 744.357 limits the damages . . . As previously stated, section 744.357 provides that “[n]o surety for a guardian shall be charged beyond . . . claim based solely on this negligence are limited to the face amount of the bond pursuant to section 744.357 . . .

PREFERRED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. L. NICHOLS,, 682 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . including attorney fees but not interest, may not exceed the penal sum of the bond, citing section 744.357 . . . appellee is entitled to an award of attorney fees to be paid by appellant, but we find that section 744.357 . . .