The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLIV
CIVIL RIGHTS

Chapter 760
DISCRIMINATION IN THE TREATMENT OF PERSONS; MINORITY REPRESENTATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 760.10

760.10 Unlawful employment practices.—

(1) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer:

(a) To discharge or to fail or refuse to hire any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.

(b) To limit, segregate, or classify employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or adversely affect any individual’s status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.

(2) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.

(3) It is an unlawful employment practice for a labor organization:

(a) To exclude or to expel from its membership, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.

(b) To limit, segregate, or classify its membership or applicants for membership, or to classify or fail or refuse to refer for employment any individual, in any way that would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or adversely affect any individual’s status as an employee or as an applicant for employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.

(4) It is an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs, to discriminate against any individual because of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.

(5) Whenever, in order to engage in a profession, occupation, or trade, it is required that a person receive a license, certification, or other credential, become a member or an associate of any club, association, or other organization, or pass any examination, it is an unlawful employment practice for any person to discriminate against any other person seeking such license, certification, or other credential, seeking to become a member or associate of such club, association, or other organization, or seeking to take or pass such examination, because of such other person’s race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.

(6) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or joint labor-management committee to print, or cause to be printed or published, any notice or advertisement relating to employment, membership, classification, referral for employment, or apprenticeship or other training, indicating any preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination, based on race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, absence of handicap, or marital status.

(7) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer, an employment agency, a joint labor-management committee, or a labor organization to discriminate against any person because that person has opposed any practice which is an unlawful employment practice under this section, or because that person has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this section.

(8)(a) Subjecting any individual, as a condition of employment, membership, certification, licensing, credentialing, or passing an examination, to training, instruction, or any other required activity that espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels such individual to believe any of the following concepts constitutes discrimination based on race, color, sex, or national origin under this section:

1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another race, color, sex, or national origin.

2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.

3. An individual’s moral character or status as either privileged or oppressed is necessarily determined by his or her race, color, sex, or national origin.

4. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race, color, sex, or national origin.

5. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, bears responsibility for, or should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment because of, actions committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, sex, or national origin.

6. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment to achieve diversity, equity, or inclusion.

7. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, bears personal responsibility for and must feel guilt, anguish, or other forms of psychological distress because of actions, in which the individual played no part, committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, sex, or national origin.

8. Such virtues as merit, excellence, hard work, fairness, neutrality, objectivity, and racial colorblindness are racist or sexist, or were created by members of a particular race, color, sex, or national origin to oppress members of another race, color, sex, or national origin.

(b) Paragraph (a) may not be construed to prohibit discussion of the concepts listed therein as part of a course of training or instruction, provided such training or instruction is given in an objective manner without endorsement of the concepts.

(9) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, it is not an unlawful employment practice under ss. 760.01-760.10 for an employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee to:

(a) Take or fail to take any action on the basis of religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status in those certain instances in which religion, sex, condition of pregnancy, national origin, age, absence of a particular handicap, or marital status is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary for the performance of the particular employment to which such action or inaction is related.

(b) Observe the terms of a bona fide seniority system, a bona fide employee benefit plan such as a retirement, pension, or insurance plan, or a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production, which is not designed, intended, or used to evade the purposes of ss. 760.01-760.10. However, no such employee benefit plan or system which measures earnings shall excuse the failure to hire, and no such seniority system, employee benefit plan, or system which measures earnings shall excuse the involuntary retirement of, any individual on the basis of any factor not related to the ability of such individual to perform the particular employment for which such individual has applied or in which such individual is engaged. This subsection shall not be construed to make unlawful the rejection or termination of employment when the individual applicant or employee has failed to meet bona fide requirements for the job or position sought or held or to require any changes in any bona fide retirement or pension programs or existing collective bargaining agreements during the life of the contract, or for 2 years after October 1, 1981, whichever occurs first, nor shall this act preclude such physical and medical examinations of applicants and employees as an employer may require of applicants and employees to determine fitness for the job or position sought or held.

(c) Take or fail to take any action on the basis of age, pursuant to law or regulation governing any employment or training program designed to benefit persons of a particular age group.

(d) Take or fail to take any action on the basis of marital status if that status is prohibited under its antinepotism policy.

(10) This section shall not apply to any religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society which conditions opportunities in the area of employment or public accommodation to members of that religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society or to persons who subscribe to its tenets or beliefs. This section shall not prohibit a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society from giving preference in employment to individuals of a particular religion to perform work connected with the carrying on by such corporations, associations, educational institutions, or societies of its various activities.

(11) Each employer, employment agency, and labor organization shall post and keep posted in conspicuous places upon its premises a notice provided by the commission setting forth such information as the commission deems appropriate to effectuate the purposes of ss. 760.01-760.10.

History.—s. 6, ch. 77-341; s. 2, ch. 78-49; s. 5, ch. 79-400; s. 1, ch. 81-109; s. 7, ch. 92-177; ss. 2, 4, ch. 92-282; s. 6, ch. 2015-68; s. 1, ch. 2022-72.

Note.—Former ss. 13.261, 23.167.

F.S. 760.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 760.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 760.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 760.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 760.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BUADE, v. TERRA GROUP, LLC,, 259 So. 3d 219 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . On April 23, 2012, Buade filed a two-count complaint alleging a violation of section 760.10, Florida . . .

BRANCH- MCKENZIE, v. BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 254 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Florida Civil Rights Act,[ ] so that an employee may assert a claim for sexual harassment under section 760.10 . . .

THOMAS, v. SEMINOLE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., 385 F. Supp. 3d 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(a). . . .

VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, v. LUSCAVICH,, 240 So. 3d 733 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The Employee's retaliation claim was brought pursuant to the FCRA, more specifically, section 760.10( . . . assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this section. § 760.10 . . . To establish a prima facie claim for retaliation under section 760.10(7), a plaintiff must demonstrate . . .

JACKSON, v. KLEEN LLC,, 238 So. 3d 378 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . Section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes (2016) provides: It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer . . .

FIELDS, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE,, 712 F. App'x 934 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10. Ms. . . .

ROLLINS, v. CONE DISTRIBUTING, INC., 710 F. App'x 814 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 760.10(l)(a), (7). . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

H. MOSER, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 709 F. App'x 985 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 760.10(7), the Warden provided a legitimate, nonre-taliatory reason for Moser’s termination, . . .

VOUDY, v. SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA,, 701 F. App'x 865 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10 et seq. . . .

SUTHERLAND, v. BOEHRINGER- INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 700 F. App'x 955 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10, and hostile work environment (Count I), disability discrimination under the FCRA (Count II . . . Stat. § 760.10. . . .

R. JUBACK, v. MICHAELS STORES, INC., 696 F. App'x 959 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10, et seq., as well as under state common law. Mr. . . .

Dr. G. SCOTT, v. SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC. a d. b. a. Em- a, 688 F. App'x 878 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10 (Florida Civil Rights Act). . . .

BANIM, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 689 F. App'x 633 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10. . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a); see Ross v. Jim Adams Ford, Inc., 871 So.2d 312, 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. . . .

F. STEPHEN, v. H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE LIFETIME CANCER SCREENING CENTER, INC., 259 F. Supp. 3d 1323 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10; Grant v. Miami-Dade Cty. . . .

LIN, v. L. DEMINGS,, 219 So. 3d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . .

MAHOLANYI, v. SAFETOUCH OF TAMPA, INC. d. b. a., 686 F. App'x 765 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a); see also 29 U.S.C. § 631(a) (stating that the ADEA protects individuals who are at . . .

ARTISTE, v. BROWARD COLLEGE,, 685 F. App'x 805 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a), (7). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Broward. . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 760.10(7). . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 214 So. 3d 552 (Fla. 2017)

. . . This instruction is based upon F.S. 760.10(1), which makes it an unlawful employment practice for an . . . This instruction uses “because of,” the causation language in F.S. 760.10(1). . . . F.S. 760.10: Laws 2015, c. 2015-68, § 6. . . . NOTE ON USE FOR 417.6 This instruction is based upon F.S. 760.10(1). 417.7 ISSUES ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM . . . NOTE ON USE FOR 417.7 This instruction is based upon F.S. 760.10(1). 417.8 BURDEN OF PROOF ON CLAIM If . . .

F. ADDISON, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 683 F. App'x 770 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

GONZALEZ, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, R. Jr., 683 F. App'x 738 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10, and Title VII of the Federal Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

TUCKER, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 678 F. App'x 893 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 760.10(7). . . . .

S. LUKE, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FLORIDA A M UNIVERSITY,, 674 F. App'x 847 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10, and retaliation, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. . . . Stat. § 760.10(7). . . .

HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT, v. SPV REALTY, LC,, 212 So. 3d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 760.11 states in relevant part that “[a]ny person aggrieved by a violation ss. 760.01-760.10 . . .

WINEBERGER, v. RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC., 672 F. App'x 914 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a). Ms. . . . Stat. § 760.10(1)(a). . . .

A. GARRISON, v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE,, 664 F. App'x 823 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(A) and (7). No reversible error has been shown; wé affirm. . . . Stat. § 760.10(7). . . .

RAY, v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE,, 664 F. App'x 816 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 760.10(Z )(a). . . . Stat. § 760.10(7). . . . Stat. § 760.10(Z )(a). . . .

DIAZ, v. FLORIDA,, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1207 (S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(a))). Evidence of discrimination may be either direct or circumstantial. Id. . . .

CLAMPETT, v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,, 669 F. App'x 963 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

DISHMAN, v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE,, 659 F. App'x 552 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, v. DeSISTO,, 197 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” because of the individual’s handicap.. § 760.10 . . .

A. MCDUFFIE, v. BROWARD COUNTY, a FLORIDA,, 654 F. App'x 408 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10(7), and Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), -3(a). . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. CARGO AIRPORT SERVICES USA, LLC, d. b. a. MIA- USA d. b. a. d. b. a. CAS,, 648 F. App'x 986 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(a). We analyze both claims jointly under the framework used to decide ADEA actions. . . .

M. CHUKES, v. SAILORMEN INC. d. b. a., 648 F. App'x 779 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

USHER, v. NIPRO DIABETES SYSTEMS, INC., 184 So. 3d 1260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . We also find that Usher stated a claim under section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). . . .

CIMINO, s v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. a, 183 So. 3d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . “Any person aggrieved by a violation of ss. 760.01-760.10 may file a complaint with' the commission within . . .

J. GRANT, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY WATER SEWER DEPARTMENT,, 636 F. App'x 462 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

Dr. G. SCOTT, v. SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC. LLC,, 145 F. Supp. 3d 1114 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(1). . . .

LINDAMOOD, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 630 F. App'x 904 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

CANDINA v. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI,, 185 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10 et seq. . . .

HOPKINS, v. JPMORGAN CHASE AND CO. N. A., 620 F. App'x 880 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10, and about discrimination based on her age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment . . .

WOOD, v. CALHOUN COUNTY FLORIDA,, 626 F. App'x 954 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a), and worker’s compensation retaliation, under Fla. Stat. § 440.205. . . .

CHAMBERS, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 620 F. App'x 872 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a) (“FCRA”). . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

HITE, v. HILL DERMACEUTICALS, INC. a, 619 F. App'x 908 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10 (“FCRA”). . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

SURTAIN, v. HAMLIN TERRACE FOUNDATION, d. b. a., 789 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

SMITH, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 621 F. App'x 955 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10. Ms. . . .

POUYEH, v. BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE, Dr. J. Dr. T., 613 F. App'x 802 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10 by denying his application to the residency program. . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 760.10(5). . . . Even if Pouyeh is correct that he can raise a claim against the individual defendants under § 760.10( . . .

H. HARRIS, v. FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,, 611 F. App'x 949 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(7). . . .

ASHKENAZI, v. SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT d. b. a., 607 F. App'x 958 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(7) (stating that it is unlawful to retaliate against “any. person”), and id. § 760.02(6) ( . . .

SPEARS, v. CREEL,, 607 F. App'x 943 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

HELLWEGE, v. TAMPA FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS, L., 103 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

CLARK, M. D. v. SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, d. b. a., 601 F. App'x 886 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

ARNOLD, v. HEARTLAND DENTAL, LLC,, 101 F. Supp. 3d 1220 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . Complaint, Arnold asserts a claim against Heartland for sex discrimination in violation of section 760.10 . . . (1)(a) (Count One) and 760.10(7) (Count Two). . . . Section 760.10(7) of the FCRA provides that: It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer .. . . . Stat. § 760.10(7). . . . Arnold asserts a claim under the opposition clause of section 760.10(7), which prohibits an employer . . .

M. TILLIS, A. v. SHERIFF OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,, 603 F. App'x 851 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10 (FCRA). . . .

A. HAMILTON, M. D. v. SHERIDAN HEALTHCORP INC. a M. D. M. D., 602 F. App'x 485 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(7); Harper v. Blockbuster Entm’t Corp., 139 F.3d 1385, 1387, 1389-90 (11th Cir.1998). . . .

R. MARGOLIS, M. D. v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY d b a, 89 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

GABERLAVAGE, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 160 So. 3d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . dismissing his charge of gender discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), section 760.10 . . .

AYALA, v. SHERIFF, BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA, Al, 594 F. App'x 602 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

BLACKMAN, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 599 F. App'x 907 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10; and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206. The district court ruled that Ms. . . .

FULLER, III, v. EDWIN B. STIMPSON CO. INC., 598 F. App'x 652 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 760.10, arising out of his long-term employment with Stimpson and his termination in 2009 as part . . .

GRANERA, v. SEDANO S SUPERMARKET, 153 So. 3d 960 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Granera because of Granera’s pregnancy in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), section 760.10 . . .

TORRES- SKAIR, v. MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. LC,, 595 F. App'x 847 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10. . . . Stat. § 760.10(1)(a). . . .

CARDELLE, v. MIAMI BEACH FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, No., 593 F. App'x 898 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

SMITH, v. CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH, a, 588 F. App'x 965 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10(1), (7), alleging that she suffered years of sex-based workplace hostility before she was . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

RABB, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, d. b. a., 590 F. App'x 849 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10(1). . . .

C. BUTTERWORTH, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS,, 581 F. App'x 813 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10, retaliatory termination under the Florida Whistleblower Act (FWA), Fla. . . .

BENDER, v. MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE, a, 578 F. App'x 822 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10. Bender presents several arguments on appeal, which we address in turn. . . .

DUBLE, v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., 572 F. App'x 889 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10(7). . . .

BARSORIAN, v. GROSSMAN ROTH, P. A., 572 F. App'x 864 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10. . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

CATASTROPHE SERVICES, INC. v. FOUCHE,, 145 So. 3d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (2012). . See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2012). . See 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-12(2012). . . . .

STANLEY, v. GREAT GLAM, INC., 161 So. 3d 457 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The limited issue of law in this case turns on whether section 760.10(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), . . . In a recent decision, the Florida Supreme Court interpreted section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2011 . . .

TELFAIR, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,, 567 F. App'x 681 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(a). . . .

SMITH, v. CITY OF FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA,, 565 F. App'x 774 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10(7). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Fort Pierce. . . .

DELVA, v. CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., 137 So. 3d 371 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Specifically, section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2011) (emphasis added), of the Florida Civil Rights Act . . . The plain meaning and fair import of the term “sex” as used in section 760.10 is gender, meaning whether . . . Therefore, pursuant to the statute’s plain meaning, section 760.10’s prohibition against sex discrimination . . . of pregnancy is prohibited by the provision in the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), section 760.10 . . . “an unlawful employment practice” for an employer to discriminate based on an individual’s “sex.” § 760.10 . . . Continental took adverse employment actions against her due to her pregnancy, in violation of section 760.10 . . . Section 760.10 provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) It is an unlawful employment practice for an . . . Section 760.10 does not specifically include the word “pregnancy” in listing the classes of individuals . . .

MAZZEO, v. COLOR RESOLUTIONS INT L, LLC,, 746 F.3d 1264 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10 (the “FCRA”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of CRI. . . .

DR. EMANUEL KONTOS, D. M. D. P. A. v. MENZ,, 136 So. 3d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . discrimination complaint or opposed a discriminatory practice, essentially tracks the language of section 760.10 . . .

SMITH, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 21 F. Supp. 3d 1286 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 760.10(1). . . .

L. JOHNSON, v. GREAT EXPRESSIONS DENTAL CENTERS OF FLORIDA, P. A., 132 So. 3d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . [t]o discharge ... any individual ... because of such individual’s race 760.10(l)(a), Fla. . . .

MENZIE, v. ANN TAYLOR RETAIL INC., 549 F. App'x 891 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

MITCHELL, v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 127 So. 3d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 760.10(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). FCHR requested and received a response from the appellee. . . .

H. JONES, v. BANK OF AMERICA,, 985 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(1). . . . Stat. § 760.10(1). . . . Stat. § 760.10(1). . . .

GILES, v. DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE, INC., 542 F. App'x 869 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10, and on her interference and retaliation claims brought under the Family Medical Leave Act . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

FULLER, III, v. EDWARD B. STIMPSON CO. INC., 971 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 2000e-2(a) (Count I), and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.10(l)(a), Fla. Stat. . . . . § 2000e-3 (Count II), and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.10(7), Fla. Stat. . . . Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (“Title VII”), and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.10 . . . of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e2(a) (Count I) and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.10 . . . of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 (Count II), and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.10 . . .

GLASS, v. CAPTAIN KATANNA S, INC., 950 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 2000e-2(a)(1)); § 760.10(1)(a) Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides in part: It is an unlawful employment practice for an . . . such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status. § 760.10 . . .

BURNS, v. CITY OF CAPE CORAL,, 520 F. App'x 913 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(1). . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

HUBBARD, v. MERITAGE HOMES OF FLORIDA, INC., 520 F. App'x 859 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10. After review, we affirm. I. . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

ESPINOSA, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION,, 519 F. App'x 991 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a), (7). Ms. . . .

SCHOPPMAN, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES,, 519 F. App'x 549 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(7). . . .

WIGFALL, v. SAINT LEO UNIVERSITY, INCORPORATED,, 517 F. App'x 910 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(7) (codifying the section of the Florida Civil Rights Act that prohibits retaliation by employers . . .

UNDERWOOD, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES STATE OF FLORIDA,, 518 F. App'x 637 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(7). . . .

SHEDRICK, v. DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MIAMI- DADE COLLEGE,, 941 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

MATTINGLY, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES,, 931 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

R. BOURNE, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY,, 508 F. App'x 907 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(1), (7). . . . Stat. § 760.10(7). Bourne’s argument fails. . . .

CHAVEZ, v. URS FEDERAL TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. f k a EG G, 504 F. App'x 819 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 760.10(1). Ms. . . .

WRIGHT, v. SANDESTIN INVESTMENTS, LLC d b a, 914 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (N.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 760.10, and violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et . . . Stat. § 760.10. Wright disagrees, citing state and federal law to the contrary. . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). The term “sex” is not explicitly defined. . . .

C. CROWLEY, v. OSI RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LLC,, 907 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . Stat. 760.10(l)(a). . . .

MOTEN, v. BROWARD COUNTY MEDICAL EXAMINER AND TRAUMA SERVICES,, 494 F. App'x 968 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 760.10. . . .

PROE, v. FACTS SERVICES, INC., 491 F. App'x 135 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 760.10(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). . . .

DELVA, v. CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., 96 So. 3d 956 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The discrete, single issue in this case is whether the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.10, Florida . . . The Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA) provides in section 760.10: It is an unlawful employment . . .

DULANEY, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 481 F. App'x 486 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 760.10(1)(a). . . .

N. YOUNG, v. BECKER POLIAKOFF, P. A., 88 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 1981, and the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Florida Statute § 760.10, et seq. . . .