The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . We reverse, finding that the trial court misread Gill, which expressly stated that section 771.01, Florida . . . Accordingly, section 771.01, Florida Statutes (2009), does not bar Chubb Indemnity’s claims for negligence . . .
. . . . § 771.01, et seq., design procedure manuals and other governmental monograms with regard to the Project . . . Defendants reviewed the modified Project, as required by FHWA’s regulations located at 23 C.F.R. § 771.01 . . .
. . . . • The clear language of Florida Statutes § 771.01 abolishes the claim of alienation of affections. . . . There is no Florida case creating an exception to § 771.01 for a cause of action for alienation of affections . . .
. . . and the other jurisdictions that have abolished cause of actions for alienation of affections, see § 771.01 . . . See ch. 23138, § 1 Laws of Florida (1945) (now codified at section 771.01, Florida Statutes (1997)); . . .
. . . written contracts attached to the complaint clearly fit within the legislative prohibition of sections 771.01 . . . Section 771.01 provides: The rights of action heretofore existing to recover sums of money as damage . . .
. . . . §§ 771.01, 771.08, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . . § 771.01. . . .
. . . 320 So.2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA1975), we recognized that the Florida “Heart Balm” statute, now section 771.01 . . .
. . . share and all of the outstanding 7% Convertible Subordinated Debentures Due 2011 of Arkansas Best for $771.01 . . .
. . . See Section 771.01, Fla. Stat.; Ponton v. Scarfone, supra; Dowling v. . . .
. . . . § 771.01 (West 1964). This statute has been construed broadly by the Florida courts. . . .
. . . Mims, 305 So.2d 787 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974) (Section 771.01, et seq., Florida Statutes, bars cause of action . . .
. . . intentional infliction of emotional distress”, a cause of action which has been expressly barred by Section 771.01 . . . , Florida Statutes (1981): 771.01 Certain tort actions abolished — The rights of action heretofore existing . . .
. . . We note that some jurisdictions have held their “Heart Balm” statutes, similar to § 771.01, F.S. 1973 . . .
. . . . § 771.01 et seq., which outlawed damage claims for alienation of affection or breach of contract to . . .
. . . . § 771.01 F.S.A. et seq., which abolishes actions for alienation of affections and is a bar to civil . . .
. . . . § 771.01, abolishing “the rights of action heretofore existing to recover sums of money as damage for . . .