Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 774.206 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 774.206 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 774.206

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 774
ASBESTOS-RELATED AND SILICA-RELATED CLAIMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 774.206
774.206 Statute of limitations; two-disease rule.
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, with respect to any asbestos or silica claim not barred as of the effective date of this act, the limitations period does not begin to run until the exposed person discovers, or through the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, that he or she is physically impaired by an asbestos-related or silica-related condition.
(2) An asbestos or silica claim arising out of a nonmalignant condition shall be a distinct cause of action from an asbestos or silica claim relating to the same exposed person arising out of asbestos-related or silica-related cancer. Damages may not be awarded for fear or risk of cancer in a civil action asserting an asbestos or silica claim.
(3) A settlement of a nonmalignant asbestos or silica claim concluded after the effective date of this act may not require, as a condition of settlement, the release of any future claim for asbestos-related or silica-related cancer.
History.s. 6, ch. 2005-274.

F.S. 774.206 on Google Scholar

F.S. 774.206 on Casetext

Amendments to 774.206


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 774.206
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 774.206.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, v. R. SPIEWAK, v. N., 73 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 2011)

. . . Section 774.206(1), Florida Statutes (2010), provides that the statute of limitations does not begin . . .

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, v. HURST,, 949 So. 2d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . discovered, that he or she is physically impaired by an asbestos-related or silica-related condition,” § 774.206 . . .

In ASBESTOS LITIGATION. v., 933 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . It dealt with this concern by enacting section 774.206(1), which provides in part that the limitations . . .