Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 782.36 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 782.36 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 782.36

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 782
HOMICIDE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 782.36
782.36 Exceptions.
(1) A patient receiving a partial-birth-abortion procedure may not be prosecuted under this act.
(2) This act does not apply to a suction or sharp curettage abortion.
(3) This act does not constitute implicit approval of other types of abortion, which remain subject to all other applicable laws of this state.
(4) This act does not prohibit a physician from taking such measures as are necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, provided that every reasonable precaution is also taken, in such cases, to save the fetus’s life.
History.s. 4, ch. 2000-142.
Note.Section 5, ch. 2000-142, provides that “[t]his act shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purposes. In the event of conflict between this act and any other provision of law, the provisions of this act shall govern.”

F.S. 782.36 on Google Scholar

F.S. 782.36 on Casetext

Amendments to 782.36


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 782.36
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 782.36.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

McCORMACK, v. L. HIEDEMAN, v. L., 694 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 782.36("A patient receiving a partial-birth-abortion procedure may not be prosecuted under this act . . .

DOMINICK, Jr. v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, FUNDABURK, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. E. JOHNSON, Jr. v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. a a a S. BONE, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. FOWLER, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. PINYAN, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. L. R. E. GODFREY, v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PINYAN, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. D. EDWARDS, v. UNITED PRESIDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a a L. M. HUNT, v. UNITED PRESIDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a a L. A. GRISSOM, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A. PONDER, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Co. WALKER, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. N. COOK, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. a BURDICK, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. a a a M. TUCKER, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. W. SPENCER, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. a a HAVEN, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. WASHBURN v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. W. McCOWN, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. A. POLK, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. R. HITT, v. DIXIE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. NICHOLS, v. ATLANTIC AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 809 F.2d 1559 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . concerning the value of his policy, Dixie sent a letter indicating that appellant’s cash value was $782.36 . . .

WIDERA, v. FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION,, 373 So. 2d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . The court then entered final judgment against appellant for $782.36 plus costs. . . .

Co. v., 70 Cust. Ct. 210 (Cust. Ct. 1973)

. . . following are the pertinent provisions of the Tariff Schedules of the United States: Classified: Item 782.36 . . .