Cases from cite.case.law:

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 143 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 2014)

. . . 657 So.2d 1152], and 2008 [996 So.2d 851], and 2014. 21.4 FALSE REPORTS OF COMMISSIONS OF A CRIME § 817.49 . . . ” is not defined in chapter 817, Florida Statutes, or in case law interpreting and applying section 817.49 . . .

D. BUTLER, v. SHERIFF OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,, 685 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 817.49 (providing that it is a misdemeanor to convey “to any law enforcement officer false information . . .

C. J. T. a v. STATE, 76 So. 3d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . of making a false report to a law enforcement officer of an alleged crime, in violation of section 817.49 . . .

D. P. a v. STATE, 65 So. 3d 123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 817.49 (2010) ("Whoever willfully ... conveys ... to any law enforcement officer ... false information . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 965 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Giving False Information Concerning A Crime 837.05(1) 21.5 False Reports of Commissions of Crime 817.49 . . .

TERRELL, v. STATE, 957 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . 2d DCA 2006), the officers clearly had probable cause to arrest him for filing a false report, see § 817.49 . . .

MARSHALL, v. AMERISYS, INC., 943 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . alleged misconduct, and asserted that Amerisys (1) committed a negligence per se violation of section 817.49 . . . further fails to state a cause of action under the theories of a negligence per se violation of section 817.49 . . .

STATE v. CARPENTER,, 899 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . charging the defendant with: Count 1 — False Report of Commission of a Crime in violation of section 817.49 . . .

BOLAND, v. STATE, 893 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . the jury on the misdemeanor offense of “false report of commission of crimes” described in section 817.49 . . . Perhaps the only difference between the misdemeanor offenses described in section 837.05(1) and section 817.49 . . . We conclude that the first-degree misdemeanors described in sections 817.49 and 837.05(1) are necessarily . . . Interestingly, there is a standard jury instruction for section 817.49, but no standard instruction for . . . of lesser offenses, however, there is a reference only to section 837.05 and no reference to section 817.49 . . .

BYFORD, v. STEPHENS, a, 299 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (S.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . Ann. § 817.49 (2000)”); see also Lee, 284 F.3d at 1195-96. . . . Specifically, under Section 817.49, Florida Statutes, Whoever willfully imparts, conveys or causes to . . . Stat. § 817.49. . . . Violations of Sections 817.49 and/or 837.05 are punishable by up to one year imprisonment. See Fla. . . . Stat. §§ 817.49 & 837.05. . . .

J. AURIGEMMA, v. STATE, 801 So. 2d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 817.49, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

FLORIDA v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (U.S. 2000)

. . . . § 817.49 (1994), and the ability of the police to trace the identity of anonymous telephone informants . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. GIBSON,, 64 F.3d 617 (11th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 817.49 (false reports of commission of crimes to law enforcement officers). . . .

MORGAN INTERNATIONAL REALTY, INC. v. DADE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., 617 So. 2d 455 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . for “personal injury arising out of the wilful violation of a penal statute,” specifically, section 817.49 . . . On the other hand, there are no allegations concerning, or references to, a violation of section 817.49 . . . prosecution does not necessarily lead us to the conclusion that the insureds willfully violated section 817.49 . . . See § 817.49, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

DOE, v. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, 734 F. Supp. 981 (S.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . §§ 837.02 and 817.49; see also Doe v. Gonzalez, supra at 694. . . . Section 817.49 provides: Whoever willfully imparts, conveys or causes to be imparted or conveyed to any . . .

DOE, v. GONZALEZ, 723 F. Supp. 690 (S.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . .-02 and 817.49, Florida Statutes. See, e.g., Acorn v. . . .

ILLINOIS SOUTH PROJECT, INC. v. P. HODEL,, 844 F.2d 1286 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 715.17(k) and 817.49, permit mine operators to create lakes under some circumstances; Illinois South . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, v. P. HODEL,, 839 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . Such water bodies shall meet the requirements of §§ 816.49 and 817.49 of this chapter; or (c) Prime farmland . . . (emphasis added). .An identical regulation, 30 C.F.R. § 817.49(a)(9), applies to water impoundments incidental . . .

CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION v. GORMAN, 18 Fla. Supp. 2d 261 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1986)

. . . 790.27, 796.06, 796.07, 800.02, 800.03, 812.014(2)(c), 812.016, 812.081, 817.035, 817.235, 817.39, 817.49 . . .

In PERMANENT SURFACE MINING REGULATION LITIGATION, 620 F. Supp. 1519 (D.D.C. 1985)

. . . . §§ 816.84(b), 817.84(b) and §§ 816.49, 817.49 are thus remanded to the extent those rules require a . . . (a)(3) and 817.49(a)(5)(i) (1984), 48 Fed.Reg. 44005 (1983), which require all impoundments— including . . . The court will remand 30 C.F.R. §§ 816.49(a)(3), 817.-49(a)(3) and 816.49(a)(5)(i), 817.49(a)(5)(i), . . . Impoundments Citizen plaintiffs challenge 30 C.F.R. §§ 816.49(a)(9), 817.49(a)(9), 48 Fed. . . . The court will remand §§ 816.49(a)(9) and 817.49(a)(9) to the Secretary as inconsistent with law. . . .

COX, v. STATE, 443 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Florida as the attempted making of a false report to a police officer concerning a crime under section 817.49 . . . Even more clearly than section 817.49, Florida Statutes (1981), section 817.234 encompasses attempts. . . . ORFINGER, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur. . § 817.49, Fla.Stat. (1981). . § 817.234, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

T. FLOWERS, v. STATE, 363 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 1978)

. . . The conviction was for falsely reporting the commission of a crime in violation of Section 817.49, Florida . . . SUNDBERG, J., concurs in result only. 817.49 False reports of commission of crimes; penalty. — Whoever . . .

SILVESTRI, v. STATE, 332 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 817.49 the violation of which the defendant was charged in Count III of the information, provides . . .

E. LEPPIG, v. GREEN,, 201 So. 2d 803 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Appellee, George Green, was charged in two separate informations with violations of §§ 817.49 and 839.13 . . .