Cases from cite.case.law:

JONES, v. STATE, 239 So. 3d 203 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . violation of this section the value of which is less than $100, is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . violation of this section the value of which is $100 or more, is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . holder of a card without the authority of [the victim] ... contrary to Florida Statutes 817.61 and 817.67 . . .

NEAL, a k a v. STATE, 109 So. 3d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . violation of this section the value of which is less than $100, is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . violation of this section the value of which is $100 or more, is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . Under section 817.67, a violation for which subsection (1) is applicable constitutes a misdemeanor of . . .

MARSHALL, v. STATE, 992 So. 2d 914 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See §§ 817.61, 817.67(2), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

GORDAY, v. STATE, 907 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . cardholder’s consent ... is guilty of credit card theft and is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . .

M. KEELS, v. STATE, 792 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . violation of this section the value of which is less than $100, is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . Section 817.67(1) provides that “[a] person who is subject to the penalties of this subsection shall . . .

PADILLA, v. STATE v. v., 753 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . forged, expired, or revoked violates this subsection and is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . The violator is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67(2) if such value does exceed $300 in . . . that he or she has furnished violates this subsection and is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . his or her agent or employee, violates this paragraph and is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . his or her agent or employee violates this paragraph and is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . .

STATE v. McDONALD,, 690 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . forged, expired, or revoked violates this subsection and is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . The violator is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67(2) if such value does exceed $300 in . . .

WRIGHT, v. STATE, 626 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Based upon our reading of the provisions of sections 817.60(1) and 817.67(1), we agree with the argument . . .

COLLINS Jr. v. STATE, 626 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . card theft), provides that any person who violates it is subject to penalties set forth in section 817.67 . . . Section 817.67(1) provides that a person subject to it is guilty of a first-degree misdemeanor. . . . SMITH and KAHN, JJ., concur. . §§ 817.60(1), 817.67(1), Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 817.481, Fla.Stat. (1991 . . .

P. LAZARUS, v. CHEVRON USA, INC., 958 F.2d 1297 (5th Cir. 1992)

. . . The award included disability compensation based on an average weekly wage of $817.67, all medical expenses . . .

MORGAN, v. STATE, 590 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Sections 817.61, 817.67 and 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

SANCHEZ, v. STATE, 507 So. 2d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . only one credit card, Sanchez must be adjudicated guilty of a first-degree misdemeanor under section 817.67 . . . (1), Florida Statutes (1985), and not a third-degree felony under section 817.67(2), Florida Statutes . . .

STATE v. SAIEZ,, 489 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 1986)

. . . preparation of such credit cards, violates this subsection and is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . . of counter-feit credit cards violates this section and is subject to the penalties set forth in s. 817.67 . . .

STATE v. SAIEZ,, 469 So. 2d 927 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . preparation of such credit cards, violates this subsection and is subject to the penalties set forth in § 817.67 . . .

STATE v. TAMBURRI,, 463 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . charged Calcagino by information with fraudulent use of a credit card in violation of sections 817.61 and 817.67 . . .

P. LONG v. D. TRAINOR,, 583 F. Supp. 1124 (E.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . also submitted a petition for attorneys’ fees of $137,182.33 plus reimbursement for expenses of $12,-817.67 . . .

D. W. a v. STATE, 428 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . credit card [§ 817.61, Fla.Stat. (1981) ] to reflect an adjudication of a misdemeanor under Section 817.67 . . .

K. v., 74 T.C. 377 (T.C. 1980)

. . . . $817.67 $408.83 1971. 5,273.71 2,636.85 1972 . 330.24 165.12 1973 . 854.36 427.18 7,275.98 3,637.98 . . .

STATE v. J. LUCK, 336 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . contention that the maximum permissible sentence was the one-year misdemeanor penalty provided by Section 817.67 . . .

FAYERWEATHER, v. STATE, 303 So. 2d 34 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . .-16, Fla.Stat., rather than under § 817.67 (1), Fla.Stat. . . .

LORE, Jr. v. STATE, 267 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . .-481 (3) (a) and compare Section 817.67, F. S.1969, F.S.A. . . . different facets of the same criminal transaction and one sentence should be entered under Section 817.67 . . .

STATE v. McCURDY,, 257 So. 2d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 817.67(2), F.S:A. . . .