Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 831.30 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 831.30 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 831.30

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 831
FORGERY AND COUNTERFEITING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 831.30
831.30 Medicinal drugs; fraud in obtaining.Whoever:
(1) Falsely makes, alters, or forges any prescription, as defined in s. 465.003, for a medicinal drug other than a drug controlled by chapter 893;
(2) Knowingly causes such prescription to be falsely made, altered, forged, or counterfeited; or
(3) Passes, utters, or publishes such prescription or otherwise knowingly holds out such false or forged prescription as true

with intent to obtain such drug commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. A second or subsequent conviction constitutes a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

History.s. 1, ch. 71-331; s. 1, ch. 72-234; s. 30, ch. 73-331; s. 12, ch. 2010-117; s. 16, ch. 2016-145.

F.S. 831.30 on Google Scholar

F.S. 831.30 on Casetext

Amendments to 831.30


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 831.30
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S831.30 1 - FORGERY OF - MAKE ALTER PRESCRIPTION SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S831.30 1 - FORGERY OF - MAKE ALTER PRESCRIPTION 1ST OFF - M: S
S831.30 2 - FORGERY OF - CAUSE PRESCRIPTION TO BE ALTERED SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S831.30 2 - FORGERY OF - CAUSE PRESCRIPTION TO BE ALTERED 1ST OFF - M: S
S831.30 2 - COUNTERFEITING OF - PRESCRIPTION CAUSE TO BE SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S831.30 2 - COUNTERFEITING OF - PRESCRIPTION CAUSE TO BE 1ST OFF - M: S
S831.30 3 - PASS FORGED - ALTERED PRESCRIPTION AS TRUE SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S831.30 3 - PASS FORGED - ALTERED PRESCRIPTION AS TRUE 1ST OFF - M: S
S831.30 3 - PASS COUNTERFEITED - PRESCRIPTION AS TRUE SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S831.30 3 - PASS COUNTERFEITED - PRESCRIPTION AS TRUE 1ST OFF - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

L. PURDY D. v. SECURITY SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION, B. GALECKE, v. SECURITY SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION,, 727 F. Supp. 1266 (E.D. Wis. 1989)

. . . Copying charges $ 831.30 Sprint telephone charges $ 231.07 Court costs $ 132.00 Westlaw research $ 3,130.50 . . .

HUDSON, v. NABISCO BRANDS, INC., 758 F.2d 1237 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . Hudson, plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment of the district court granting costs in the amount of $831.30 . . . memoranda, the magistrate, in a minute order, granted appellee’s motion to assess costs to the extent of $831.30 . . . in favor of defendant Nabisco Brands, Inc. and against the plaintiff, Henry Hudson in the amount of $831.30 . . . Neither the magistrate nor the district court explained why the award was for $831.30 while appellee’ . . . judge, stated: “Defendant Nabisco Brands, Inc.’s motion to assess costs is granted in the amount of $831.30 . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. AGNEW, 552 F. Supp. 1027 (D. Mass. 1982)

. . . Carey $372.94/week $ 831.30 Robert Kailher $605.77/week $1,466.14 Harold Bailey $403.85/week $ 629.98 . . .