Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 843.23 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 843.23 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 843.23

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 843
OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 843.23
843.23 Tampering with an electronic monitoring device.
(1) As used in this section, the term “electronic monitoring device” includes any device that is used to track the location of a person.
(2) It is unlawful for a person to intentionally and without authority:
(a) Remove, destroy, alter, tamper with, damage, or circumvent the operation of an electronic monitoring device that must be worn or used by that person or another person pursuant to a court order or pursuant to an order by the Florida Commission on Offender Review; or
(b) Request, authorize, or solicit a person to remove, destroy, alter, tamper with, damage, or circumvent the operation of an electronic monitoring device required to be worn or used pursuant to a court order or pursuant to an order by the Florida Commission on Offender Review.
(3) A person who violates this section commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.s. 1, ch. 2016-15.

F.S. 843.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 843.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 843.23


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 843.23
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S843.23 2a - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - TAMPERING WITH ELECTRONIC MONITORING DEVICE - F: T
S843.23 2b - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REQ/AUTH PERSON TAMPER ELEC MONITORING DEVICE - F: T
S843.23 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9346 - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WOLFE, v. ROUTZAHN,, 953 F. Supp. 2d 627 (D. Md. 2013)

. . . should either enter judgment as to damages in the amount of Wolfe’s medical bill after his arrest ($843.23 . . . Routzahn responds that the jury properly refused to award $843.23 because there was no evidence that . . . medical expenses; accordingly, the Court declines Wolfe’s request to enter judgment in the amount of $843.23 . . .

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, v. DYKEMA, GOSSETT, SPENCER, GOODNOW TRIGG, a DYKEMA, GOSSETT, SPENCER, GOODNOW TRIGG Co. v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY,, 625 F. Supp. 1052 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . (c) American Home shall also pay to Dykema the sum of $52,193.83 plus $18,-843.23, representing interest . . .